Your Overall Stupid Person

HIGH SCHOOL EDITION

 

 

A.S. Seven years to the month after I started to write this dissertation, I checked to see if any psychiatrists, psychologists and laypeople wrote anything online that I could find about what it's like being stupid because I was curious to know if other people noticed the same things about shitheads that I have. As I predicted, they mentioned a big portion of the things that I mentioned below.

 

One MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR thing that someone mentioned that I didn't know is that stupid people are mean because since they don't have the mental capacity that most everyone does, this means that stupid people don't have the mental capacity to feel empathy towards others.

 

(Just like there was a coyote that took up residence in a suburb of Toms River New Jersey last summer and the coyote killed a baby deer, tearing it up and not eating it, which means that the coyote killed the baby deer just for the fun of it and this is because the coyote didn't have the brains to feel bad for the baby deer--unlike the human who found the baby deer in her backyard.)

 

Ever since I was a youth, I have heard many times over that stupid people can't get old ideas out of their heads and that stupid people are black-and-white thinkers and different ways that they are (for example, my friend once said to me, "stupid people think that everything is extreme" and my father once said to me, "stupid people think that things are either good or bad.").

 

The most common things that people mentioned online is that people who are unbelievably stupid have fragile egos and so if they get into an argument and find out in the argument that they were wrong for thinking something, they keep on arguing, that stupid people make assumptions based on stupid logic and that they don't ever change their minds about anything. Someone who wrote a wiki page about how to deal with stupid people wrote that it's futile trying to explain to stupid people why they are wrong for thinking something that's stupid. I can only paraphrase him, but he wrote that upon rationally explaining to stupid people why something they think is very obviously and unmistakably wrong, that they're not going to be like, "You know I never looked at it like that before."

 

Lot's of people pointed out that shitheads don't feel empathy with people. One of the people who pointed this out was a psychiatrist.

 

Most of what I read were message board posts and articles by laypeople and not psychiatrists and psychologists. People mentioned that shitheads won't in an argument in any way acknowledge that they have been made to realize that they had an intellectually incorrect opinion because they worry that the people they're arguing with will take it as a victory and also the shitheads worry that the people they argue with will think that they're the smarter ones, and that shitheads in arguments that they get into who are made to realize that they've had an intellectually incorrect opinion, will delude themselves that it's the intellectually correct opinion and then keep on arguing.

 

The articles and message board posts mentioned many different miscellaneous things that I mentioned--such as stupid people not being able to do favors for anyone without expecting something in return (two people mentioned this) and stupid people not being able to understand how everyone else doesn't have the same kind of rationale as them, that stupid people think that they are super intelligent and very skilled at things that they are worse than most people at doing. One woman in a message board post made a list of lots of things that she noticed about stupid people and she wrote each thing that she mentioned about them on a separate line and on one line she wrote, "being mean." Someone else wrote something about how when arguing that stupid people like to get in digs (I'm paraphrasing, but s/he used the word "digs"). One person wrote, "they speak in very sweeping generalities." Someone wrote how most people "are full of doubt," but that stupid people believe things to be true beyond all doubt.

 

The articles and message board posts mentioned many many many different miscellaneous things that I've noticed but didn't mention below. For example, around four people mentioned that stupid people buy things that they can't afford and live beyond their means. I sort of mentioned this when I wrote that stupid people who aren't affluent will oftentimes find a way of swinging a luxury car. I am pretty sure that more than one person wrote that stupid people haven't learned proper grammar. At least one person wrote that stupid people have lots of kids which they cannot financially provide for. I can't remember a time that I've listened to Evander Holyfield being interviewed without repeatedly using incorrect grammar. He only at this time (September 2017) has a $500-thousand net worth. Online somewhere, it says that one of the reasons he lost most of his money is because he had to pay child support for eleven children. At this time, Evander Holyfield's net worth is a half a million dollars.

 

A psychiatrist or psychologist wrote that "a stupid person will harass you for no reason." "they cause problems for others without apparent benefit to themselves." I've noticed this decades before having read this. For example, just because it's Tuesday, a stupid person will antagonize you or try to trick you into thinking that your intellect isn't coming through for you or that you don't have a particular right to do something that you have one hundred percent of a right to do or humiliate you. An example of someone who isn't stupid harassing someone for a reason would be if the person did something to offend them. Even if the thing that the person did to offend them is something harmless that doesn't at all mean that their intellects aren't coming through for them or that their morals could use some improving. For example, I used to snap at people for being in my way in stores. I have yet to meet just one person who is at least average in intelligence who likes to mess with people for no reason.

 

A psychiatrist or psychologist wrote that "stupid people always have to be right."

 

Psychiatrists wrote that stupid people who because they are stupid are inept at something, think that they are superb at it and perform way above average at it.

 

***

 

 

Probably not counting Puerto Ricans, I have yet to meet one shithead who also did not have bad morals. This is probably because unbelievably stupid people are genetically inferior beings. The reason why it just may be true that I have met Puerto Ricans who are stupid, but not amoral must be because since there are millions and millions of these humanoids and since they're basically an entirely stupid race, they can't all be bad apples. I have a pet theory that the reasons why this race of freaks don't have morals like the rest of us do is because they are so stupid. This is because every shithead that I've ever known was a bad person, so I'm thinking that since Puerto Ricans are a race of shitheads that this is the reason why they are scum. If apparently being of an inferior intellect means being amoral, if Puerto Ricans are the dumbest people in creation, wouldn't it make sense that they just have to be bad all the way down to the core?

 

One of the reasons why when a stupid adult finds out in the course of arguing with someone that he's the one with the intellectually incorrect opinion that he keeps on arguing with the person and for even twentysomething minutes and sometimes for three quarters of an hour or even longer is because he figures that he should settle for trying to convince himself that he's smarter than the person he's arguing with by outsmarting the person by being tricky.

 

When a shithead is arguing with someone and if who's right has to do with whose opinion is intellectually correct, and if the shithead in the course of the argument is made to learn that his opinion is the one that's wrong, or if he suspects that his opinion is most likely the one that's wrong, the main reason he continues arguing is because he wants the person whom he's arguing with to think that he's less intelligent than the shithead. That is, it's more upsetting to the shithead that (a) the person might be thinking that they are the shithead's intellectual superior than it is upsetting to the shithead that he could be less intelligent than he thought and that (b) if he's not less intelligent than he thought, it's still a fact that his intellect didn't come through for him. Also, if the shithead doesn't think that the person he's arguing with thinks that he's smarter than the shithead, the shithead still nonetheless doesn't like it that the person thinks that he or she is smart enough to know better than the shithead in that one lone instance and this is more perturbing to him than it is perturbing to him that his intellect has failed him by having had an opinion that meant that he is not as smart as he would prefer to be.

 

A number of times, I've racked my brain to try to see if there was anyone I've ever known who minded as much as shitheads mind having someone let it be known to them that their intellect has failed them, that they were nasty to someone and that they don't have a prerogative that they wish they had and Nobody is who I was able to recall. But like I've said, I don't know of any individual who was just stupid without also being amoral, so maybe this means that stupid people who aren't amoral don't hate with a passion having people convey they think any of the abovementioned three things about them?

 

In other words, every shithead I have ever met has hated with the heat of a thousand white hot suns when they found out that they have had an intellectually incorrect assumption or when they had suspected that they might have had an intellectually correct assumption. I have absolutely never in my entire life have ever known even one person who isn't a shithead who has hated with the heat of a thousand white hot suns when they found out that they had an intellectually incorrect assumption. Also, if you tell a shithead that an assumption of theirs is wrong, even if they disagree with you that it's wrong, they hate with the heat of a thousand white hot suns that you are telling them that their assumption is wrong because they know that you are thinking that they have the intellectually incorrect opinion and they want so desperately for you to think that they are smarties and your intellectual superior by immeasurable means.

 

Some of the most frequent things that a stupid person makes assumptions about are other people and jobs, other people and money, non-platonic things about someone other than themselves, other people being stupid, amoral, weird, crazy, pussies and ego-maniacs, that everyone in the world is exactly like them, illnesses, that people do things for one reason only, how if someone is a member of a group that the stupid person isn't a member of that all of the people who are members of that group all think and behave exactly like one another and have a way different brain than the stupid person's brain and to the point where they are almost another species. The shithead doesn't know that they're just people like him.

 

Stupid people don't ever rule out their assumptions on their own.

 

Stupid people think that everyone in the world is exactly like them.

 

When a stupid person gets an idea in his head, he doesn't know that it's a _hunch_ and not a _fact_. Stupid people get ideas in their heads all the time. When someone who isn't stupid gets an idea in his head that isn't too likely to be true, he knows that it isn't. Then, he'll analyze it and most of the time he will rule it out; or at the least he'll conclude that there isn't much of a chance that it can be true. But all a stupid person knows is that the idea is in his head. This is just one out of umpteen ways that stupid people don't process information the same ways that people who are slightly below average in intelligence all the way up to geniuses of the highest order do.

 

Every stupid person thinks that it's _a cinch_ getting anyone to think any particular thing the stupid person makes up, no matter how preposterous the notion.*

 

Stupid people think that it's as easy as one, two, three to talk you into going out and doing whatever the stupid people want you to do. They even think that they can get you to go out and do something every day that is not only anathema to you, but that is anathema to everyone. This is because stupid people think that no one but themselves are free thinkers.

 

Stupid people think that no sooner said than done they can talk you into stopping doing something that is in your best interest to do and that you live for and that you do all of the time and have for years on end.

 

One reason stupid people think that they stand a good enough chance at talking you out of doing something no sooner said than done that you really like doing and that are established habits our of yours and that you've being doing for years and years and are part of your lifestyle and why they think that they can talk you into doing things no sooner said than done that you would sooner slit your own throat than do and that would be the cause of you being worse off and why they think that they can spend like seven seconds telling you something that will be the cause of you instantaneously loving something that you don't have any interest in and/or that is Chinese water torture to you and why they think that they can just spend seven seconds to tell you something that will instantaneously be the cause of you hating something that you not only don't mind at all but that you are looking forward to and have your heart set on and that you would do anything for and that is the cat's whiskers to you and is the cat's meow to you and like cute best man good and like getting put with an usher who's not shorter than you good and like shoe shopping good and like I'd like to thank the Academy Good and better than sex and a rather extraordinary experience is because stupid people think that you are stupid and so you don't have a mind of your own and so you're not going to give any thought to what they are telling you. In other words, they think that you're going to automatically take their word for it without spending even one zeptosecond pondering whether or not you should agree.

 

Another reason stupid people think that in seven seconds or less that they can talk you out of doing whatever it may be that they don't want you to do are because stupid people don't know people and so they think that it's real easy for them to get you to care deeply about things that mean nothing to you. They even think that they can get you to care deeply about things that no one could ever care about but them. Whenever they do, they are thinking that you are one of the only people alive who doesn't care about the thing that they are trying to get you to care about. One reason why shitheads sometimes try to get you to care about something is because the shitheads care about the thing that they are trying to get you to care about and shitheads all think that everyone in the world is exactly like them and so they conclude that if they just point out to you why they think that you should care about something that you immediately will. They also think that if you don't care about something due to your personality not being the same as theirs, then you should make yourself become like them and start caring about whatever the stupid/trivial thing is that they care about and that you're stupid because you have your own personality and so you don't care about some tiny thing that doesn't matter at all. Since they take it for granted that your personality is their personality, they operate under the premise that all they need do is to just simply point out to you why you should care about what they care about and then just as soon as they're done, you will and so they will thereby be altering your behavior forevermore.

 

They also think that they can get you to care about things that not only they themselves don't care about, but that no one in the history of the world has ever cared about.

 

Another reason all shitheads think that in seven seconds or less that they can talk you out of doing whatever it may be that they don't want you to do--including things that the shitheads know are in your best interest to do and sometimes would even be the cause of you ruining your own life if you were to stop doing what they want you to stop doing are because shitheads think they you are mind-boggingly stupid and so you are easily tricked.

 

Not counting children, stupid people are the world's most obvious liars.

 

Stupid people are the worst at getting people to believe lies.

 

Stupid people think that everyone in the world tries their best at everything they do. Stupid people also think that people try their best when they're not even trying at all.

 

Stupid people think in assumptions. One single assumption of theirs can snowball into a giant multi-detailed assumption or it can branch out into various brand-spanking-new assumptions that are way off base from the original thing that made them start assuming.

 

The people who've made the most shit-for-brains assumptions are people who assume incessantly.

 

Stupid people think that everyone does major things for one reason and one reason only.

 

Stupid people think that everything has to do with them and that they are the center of the universe and that the world works however they want it to.

 

Stupid people think that they are owed in life by everybody.

 

The more retarded of an assumption, opinion or delusion the stupid person has, the more likely it is that no one will be able to teach them that it's incorrect. Also, if their thought-process behind the retarded thing that they think is so stupid that no one who doesn't have a shit intellect could ever have as a thought-process, the more likely it is that no one will be able to teach them that it's incorrect.

 

If a stupid person fails to realize how he's a sorry case of an open book about some way he's been acting that's over the top and highly unusual due to how (1) the stupid think that everyone else is stupid too and therefore no one can have the ounce of brains that is all that's necessary to be able to read him and (2) that stupid don't give any thought to what could be going on inside other people's heads, then usually no one can teach him that his behavior is even the slightest bit apparent to anybody. (This is because it is not possible for him to learn approximately how smart people are and approximately how stupid he is, no matter how long he lives.) And if a stupid person thinks something retarded about somebody or himself, then usually no one will succeed at teaching him that his opinion is not even the slightest bit true. He won't even change his opinion if his opinion is ONLY his opinion because he's deluding himself that it is something true. If the shithead's delusion is so stupid that if the delusion was anybody's genuine opinion that it would mean that this person is way below average in intelligence or if the delusion being true means everything to the shithead, then he will not be able to be taught that the delusion is untrue. When it is possible to convince him, it takes a long time and you'll have to keep repeating yourself and you usually have to do it on another occasion or two or three or ten. After he finally does learn, a really short while later, you'll very likely have to start all over again. Also, if a shithead thinks that his life matters more than other people's, you either won't be able to teach him that it doesn't, or if you can, then anywhere between a fraction of a second to a few minutes later he will be back to thinking that his life is the one that matters the most. Usually a shithead can't be taught by someone that something isn't true that he wants badly to be true. If someone has the ability to teach him that it's not true, he'll only remain taught for anywhere between a fraction of a second to a few minutes tops. Once every couple years, he might have the ounce of brains that it takes to stay taught for a couple of days.

 

If a shithead has a thought-process that's so stupid that no one who isn't a shithead could ever have as a thought-process and if he thinks that his thought-process is either the thought-process of everyone else in the world, or that it's the thought-process of mostly everyone in the world and that everyone who doesn't have that thought-process of his must be stupid, then this usually means that he cannot ever be taught by someone that it's a stupid and incorrect thought-process. But if it's only a thought-process that's only a little bit stupid to pretty damned stupid, he'll be smart enough to be taught it and he will sometimes even stay taught that it's stupid.

 

What it's like associating with a stupid person is having him explain to you his assumptions about what you did in the past, what you care about dearly, what you would do in a given situation, why you think things and what your current plans are.

 

Associating with stupid people entails arguing with them about what you did or didn't do and why you did it or didn't do it and umpteen others things that only YOU could know about.

 

Sometimes it is possible to teach a stupid person that a preposterous misassumption of theirs isn't true--but--only for a fraction of a second or for one-point something seconds. This is because the stupid person doesn't want to hear it (usually for a variety of reasons) and so they delude themselves that what you tell them is untrue and they are capable of deluding themselves in a flash that you're wrong because they are not in touch with their thoughts and so they are totally unaware they're even doing it. And they have piss poor memories and so they forget that they ever thought otherwise. They also have selective memories. Also, what they do is they think they are magically wishing what you tell them into untruths. Other reasons they can't get old ideas out of their heads is because their minds are narrow, so the old ideas are lodged in their skulls. They don't have the wisdom to know that they might learn things if they open their minds. Plus they can't open their minds to what people tell them because they know that if they do, then they wouldn't know where to go from there. Their minds are narrow and so they can't put the old idea aside and let the new idea come in. There's no room for the other idea to come in because the old idea is taking up all of the space. They don't know what to do when two competing ideas are in their heads. Also, stupid people are closed-minded. I.e., there's no opening in their skulls. But once in a great while there is an opening for a second or so--though it's narrower than the new idea, hence it might as well not have ever materialized in the first place. (It's analogous to trying to put a soccer ball in a golf hole and then having the hole close up after one second. A tiny fraction of the ball will go in for the second that the hole is there. Or an entire new idea that they don't like can go in all the way very similarly to when a goldfish thinks one of its turds is food, then takes it into its mouth and shoots it back out an eighth of a second later sending it whizzing through the water.) Stupid people have over-sized egos because they're buffoons and so they're arrogant and so they don't want to conclude that they were wrong due to how they're not as smart as they need to be. They don't like losing arguments and they like winning and being right and they think that what they want is what has to be. They are control freaks because they are buffoons who have over-sized egos and so they can't stand feeling at a loss of control by being schooled and by realizing they were wrong and that they lost the argument and that the other person might be thinking that he is the smarter one and that whether he does or whether he doesn't, he still knows that his opinion is the intellectually correct opinion. If you start presenting a strong case to airheads you're arguing with, then sometimes they will tune you out with the logic that if they don't hear what you say, you will not be saying anything valid. That's also why they interrupt you to drown you out and to outtalk you. Another reason they interrupt is to cut you off so that if you can't speak, then whatever the things are that you would have said will magically be all lame. It's also to change the subject. Usually, the stupid person doesn't have to bother with too much of the above because they don't believe you.

 

Sometimes when people of lower intelligence are in an argument and get told why their opinion is wrong, they will shoot down the thing they're hearing without taking the time to consider whether or not the thing sounds feasible. In other words, they are one hundred percent aware that they don't have the foggiest idea if the thing they've just been told is correct information or incorrect information and since they don't want to learn AND be bested and because they don't want the person who is right to know that he has the intellectually correct opinion and that he outperformed the shitheads intellectually in a particular way and because they don't want the person to think the shitheads fools, the shitheads will manage to come up with something to say to contradict what they've just heard. And it will take them three seconds only.

 

The three most frequent ways a shithead's brain malfunctions on him are when he's thinking about non-platonic things about other people, things that have to do with other people having jobs or not having jobs, and things that have to do with other people and money or material objects. The dumb-assery is mostly instances of assuming, but it is sometimes instances of jealousy and lots of other miscellaneous things.

 

People who are stupid think that they can magically turn back the clock so that they can magically recreate what your personal opinions have always been and to magically fix it so that you weren't physically at a certain location and to magically wish it so that you are NOT where you are right now and to magically teleport you to where they want you to be and magically change it so that you didn't do something that you previously did and magically change it so that you did things that never even crossed your mind and that would be out of character for you to do and that you would sooner eat a urinal cake than do. A shithead sometimes even thinks he can change what your sexual preference always has been, what your race is, and all the other things about you which just happen to suit his fancy.

 

The ultra stupid think that they know better than you about what your personal opinions are. I.e., they think you are wrong about what you know your own core beliefs and viewpoints to be, what your _value system_ is, why you did things, what you like, what occupies your thoughts and what doesn't even enter your radar, what you don't care at all about, what bores you, what would repulse you, what information you have already long long long ago learned etc.

 

Besides stupid people not wanting you to know that their intellects had failed them, yet another reason why they usually won't ever admit to you that you've taught them that they had thought something that was wrong is because they don't want you to think that they're fools.

 

Stupid people don't really assume anything that isn't something narrow-minded.

 

Just under a hundred percent of all stupid people's assumptions have to do with other people.

 

Stupid people believe stereotypes, clichés and commonly held myths and things that they alone think about people that aren't true and things that are sometimes partially true. For example, only a scoundrel can get rich. Everyone who has a low-level job is stupid. No one can be successful without going to college. All women will only go on dates with tall men. "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas." "Nice guys finish last."

 

The less intelligent have difficulty concentrating on two things at the same time. Even things that are simple to understand.

 

If a stupid person is a parent, well then they think that everyone in the world is as interested in their kid(s) as they are. Especially if they only have one kid.

 

Stupid people think that if you make a tiny mistake that this has to mean that you won't ever be able to do it correctly because you're stupid. Also, the concept of you doing it just fine the next time is gray and stupid people don't see gray. Some of them can't even learn that you have done it without any problem(s) after they've watched you do it many times over and after seeing tons of evidence of it and after you've pointed all this out to them and after a number of other people in addition did too. When I say that stupid people can't learn that you've done something correctly after finding that you've done it incorrectly, I don't merely mean that if in the future you are to do it correctly over and over and right before their very eyes that they can't learn that you are able to do it, but if before you've ever done it incorrectly, if they were to have bore witness to you umpteen times having done it beautifully--AND on top of that, if they've complimented you on how good you are at it, none of that might as well have ever happened.

 

Stupid people don't understand that other people make mistakes and that they don't do things terrifically because they weren't trying their hardest or because there were extenuating circumstances and that it's got nothing to do with a lack of brains. Even if the thing in question is something that--without exaggerating--a one-year-old can do or that an animal can do.

 

Stupid people sometimes think that if you haven't tried to do something and are worse off for you not having made the slightest bit of an attempt at doing it, that this means that you tried your hardest at it but failed.

 

Stupid people also think that if you didn't do something and are worse off for not having done it, then this is because you didn't know that you should do it or that you know that you don't know how to do it and so you didn't bother with it because you foreknew that you would fail miserably at it and that you wouldn't even have a clue to know how to begin.

 

Stupid people think that tiny mistakes are humongous. Plus they think you are screwing up when you aren't doing anything wrong in the least.

 

The stupidest people I've known (not counting the mildly retarded on down) not only haven't noticed that their intellects aren't quite up to snuff, they think that they're way above average in intelligence.

 

Stupid people take everything for its face value. For example, if you didn't put a stamp on an envelope, but think you did, so it comes back _Return to Sender_, you are not smart enough to have learned what a stamp is. Or, you are not smart enough to ever learn how to affix a stamp to an envelope. In a galactic year, not only would you be too stupid to figure out how to use the glue on the back of the stamp to affix it to an envelope, you also would be too stupid to figure out some other way of affixing the stamp to an envelope. For example, you can't come up with the idea of putting Elmer's glue on the back of the stamp. Plus if people keep showing you how to do it, you'll never be able to learn.

 

Stupid people hear things that you tell them in their very own special way.

 

Stupid people have their own made-up wisdom.

 

Stupid people think that your personal business is theirs and various other people's too.

 

Stupid people think that everything is either a _hundred percent_ or _zero percent_. Everything is either _hot_ or _cold_. Things can only be _A-Okay_ or _god awful_. Not _pretty good_, just _so-so_ or _barely tolerable_. Everyone is either a big shot or a two-bit loser. Someone is either real smart or real stupid. Every answer is yes or no. Not _maybe_ or _probably_. There's no such thing as 80%, 77%, 4%, 15%, 29%. In other words, stupid people think that everything is extreme. And a stupid person doesn't know that sometimes there's no possible way to know what the chance of someone doing something is. They don't even know that no one is able to predict what a complete stranger would do in a particular scenario and that any answer of theirs is but _guesswork_ (more often that not it has to do with them not having any insight into people). Also, a stupid person often thinks that all of the people in the world or that all of the people belonging to a particular group would do the same thing in hypothetical scenarios.

 

Puerto Ricans are so much less intelligent than people who aren't Puerto Ricans.

 

If you tell a stupid person a major decision you've made, then you get their opinions. Usually, their opinions are about why your idea is a VERY bad one. Especially if it has to do with money, a job or something non-platonic or sometimes if it's about a hobby that the shithead isn't the type to have as a hobby. There are numerous reasons for this. One of the reasons is because stupid people can't recognize a good idea even when it bites them in the ass. Another reason is because stupid people think that what's right for them is what is right for everyone else, and so if you tell a stupid person about an occupation that you want to make a career out of or about how you plan on getting a date or that you want to take up a certain hobby or something else that's serious that you want to do or that you did already, it had better be something that the stupid person would want to do or is interested in, because if it's not, the fucker will explain to you how and why your idea sucks big time. Sometimes they will explain that the plan you thought up won't even get off the ground or that it can, however you will face a world of trouble. They will also give you bum advice which would prevent you from achieving your goal or that would waste your time, and they will bombard you with useless information they think is of monumental importance and they will tell you untrue things that they deem are facts. Also, stupid people think that everything is about them and so if you let someone stupid know that you are going to do something that takes know-how and special training that the stupid person hasn't had a reason to learn about or that he doesn't have the imagination for or that you have to be creatively inclined to know how to do, there's a chance that he will think that you won't be skilled enough to make it work--and if he does, he'll feel a burning desire to tell you. For instance, telling a stupid person who's a biologist your ideas for an insurance agency can result in him disagreeing with you about how you will not be filing for bankruptcy shortly after you open it. That is, since he didn't make the insurance business his line of work, you couldn't have learned enough from working as an insurance salesman to go into business for yourself. Nor would you know whether the landlord is asking too high of a price for the office space you have in mind. Even if you would, then you aren't equipped to negotiate a good a lease. (Stupid people think that it takes a big intellect to do things that are pretty darn easy.)

 

Another reason stupid people think that most any major thing that you are planning to do is something that you shouldn't do is because the stupidest possible thing to think about an excellent idea is that it's a shitty idea. The stupidest thing there is for them to think about it being a shitty idea is that it's a shitty idea because it can't work. And your idea can't just not pan out so that the only downside to it is that it's a waste of your time and energy--it's going to come back to bite you in the ass and you're going to be sorry. They will expect you to believe that for the very first time in your life that you will be both (1) making a complete miserable mess out of doing something and that (2) you are heading over a cliff (e.g., you will end up in jail, broke, dead). But even if they do know it can work, they'll deem it 'foolish'. They'll think it's something that no one in their right mind should want to get involved in and that you're a fool for it not being anathema to you. In other words, the stupidest thing there is to think is ALL and not some of the above: the life decisions can't be pulled off and that you will only be putting yourself into a bad spot (oftentimes you're going to be ruined), but that even if they are easy enough to do, you're stupid for liking the things. And on top of all that, the stupid person very often will tell you what to do instead and the thing they tell you is never something that's not exceptionally stupid.

 

Stupid people think that it's possible for adult people who aren't retarded to be waaaaaay stupider and way way way way (and so on) more inept than retards and literally as wet behind the ears as a two-year-old and that everyone is so out of touch that we all might as well be living on a different planet. E.g., if a stupid person pegs you as stupid, he therefore might for no reason at all, automatically take it for granted that you don't know what a suitcase is or that there is a good possibility that you don't. But it's more likely that you might say something or do something to make him get the idea in his head that you don't know what a suitcase is. If you had previously lent him a number of suitcases that you own, that wouldn't matter a bit. A stupid person might think that it is a possibility that your average person eighteen to a hundred doesn't know what an air-conditioner looks like or what it does. In sum, stupid people think that older children and adults don't know what common things are. A stupid person might think that he has reason to conclude that a particular adult hasn't learned that people who know each other say "hello" to one another when they come in contact with each other. A stupid person might think that someone who isn't retarded is so stupid that in a million years s/he can't be taught how to set an alarm clock. A stupid person sitting in the lobby of an apartment building who's watching a porter mop the floors might think that the reason that the porter hasn't mopped up mud on the floor yet is because he's too stupid to know that the mud is not supposed to be there and so when he's done mopping the floors, he will have left mud there.

 

The stupid will bore you fuckless.

 

When people tell a stupid person every one of the reasons why he's wrong for making an assumption about them, he's incapable of discerning the information he just heard sounds right and that these people are wording their sentences in such a way that there's no way that they're lying to him about how they didn't do what he accused them of. Nor can a stupid person discern from the things people say and from their demeanor that they aren't at all behaving like they would be if they really were in the course of doing whatever the stupid person is assuming they're doing. There are three reasons for all this. (1) Stupid people don't know facial expressions, tones and body languages very well and so they are unable to see that someone's not acting. (2) They don't have the people smarts to deduce what sounds like something someone says that isn't an instance of the person making something up.** (3) When your typical dumbass fuckwit idiot assumes, the nonsense he's assuming is the main idea in his head. Then, shades of gray are the person's demeanors, voices and words whom the ass clown is assuming shit about or of a third party explaining that the assumption is straight-up stupid and why.*** I.e., it's besides the point that there's no way the person could be such a polished actor that he can pull off seeming so natural.

 

Dumbshits's memories suck puke and so oftentimes you cannot talk to them about significant past conversations that you've had with them or about things that you've done with them etc. It's not just that if you think you're reminiscing with them that they don't know what the hell you're talking about, they might bring up something significant for discussion that you've recently spoken to them about with the belief it's a whole new topic. Sometimes what they bring up is an assumption or an uninformed opinion of theirs which you had previously taught them was incorrect or where you failed to, yet they are thinking you're having the conversation for the very first time.

 

Yet another reason stupid people assume and like they get paid by the dozen for their assumptions is because sometimes in order for them to process what you tell them, you have to use long and explicitly detailed sentences. Just telling a stupid person that you'll be stopping by a 7-Eleven, for all you know, he'll take this to mean that you're planning to pull up in your car alongside a 7-Eleven and then a few seconds later, take off. If so, he could possibly take this to mean that you want to case out the place for a stickup. If so, you're the reason he is missing his wallet. You must leave NO room for misinterpretation and/or for him to try go filling in the blanks! (Also, since just telling a stupid person that you'll be stopping by a 7-Eleven might be too vague of a sentence, he might know that he doesn't know what you mean and he'll feel baffled.)

 

The less intelligent regularly use false clues to arrive at the conclusion that other people are crazy. Their so-called clues are never not narrow-minded premises. They also take guesses about other people being crazy, and always based on narrow-minded premises. They also make up lies about people being crazy based on narrow-minded premises.

 

Shitheads think that if someone does something quirky or nutty that a crazy person might do as a result of them being crazy, but that a sane person also might do, that this means that the person is a raving lunatic.

 

Stupid people think that people who are relative strangers to them whom they unrelentingly mess with in hatred and with malice forethought care about them dearly and have fond feelings for them, and so too do people who are total strangers to them and to such an extent that they actually are glad to put the stupid people before them--and there's never a time they're not.

 

Stupid people don't know the difference between right and wrong. For example, I've never even once personally known or have heard tell of any full adult but shitheads who thought that they had the God-given right to antagonize someone unprovoked and say whatever they wanted to someone who never did anything to them, to repeatedly harass someone verbally or to threaten anyone on earth or to repress someone on a one-on-one basis or humiliate someone in public. In these examples, the shitheads become indignant with ALL the people who aren't submissive to them and these shitheads had sought vengeance.

 

If you win an argument or even one single little point of an argument with someone of an inferior intellect, she will right away make up any ol' excuse to lecture, second-guess and chastise you for something irrelevant. This is so the shithead doesn't have to ponder that she isn't too bright and to delude herself and you into thinking that she's a braniac and won the argument, to control-freak the situation, and because stupid people very easily get insecure and then go into _defense mode_, therefore they operate under the theory that the best defense is a straight-forward attack. Stupid people even go on the defense if you prove to them that you didn't do something that they accused you of that mostly everyone else would likewise think that you did (i.e., if shitheads make an assumption that isn't stupid, they still feel stupid for having been wrong and they will artificially manufacture something new to lecture, second guess or chastise you for. they're not smart enough to know what they don't need to be insecure about). Also, mention to a stupid person something that embarrasses her or make her feel stupid by criticizing her--she'll immediately go on the attack by trying to trick you into thinking something negative about yourself that a baby wouldn't fall for. I.e., she will insult you instead of replying directly to what you addressed or she'll undermine you. (I'll give an example of people doing each of these things. I used to hang out with a homosexual shithead who pretends to be straight. Or maybe he's a drop physically attracted to females, I don't know. In an internet message board, he posted a picture of a half-nude pre-op transsexual with his graffiti name tattooed on his back and tried to pass the fellow off as a feminine female. A mutual friend of ours whom I'll call Jumping Jack Flash saw the picture and thus must have suspected that he's gay had e-mailed the shithead to ask what's up with the picture. Hence, this shithead, in an e-mail told Jumping Jack Flash that he is sick; expecting him to promptly go deeming himself 'sick'. Once I complained to the ass clown's girlfriend (he had a girlfriend because he thought that by obtaining a girlfriend this would magically fix it so he's attracted to females and not males) that whenever we go to Sports Authority, he parks all the way in the back of the parking lot when there are empty spaces in the front; just out of the one in a couple thousand chance that he's avoiding someone scratching or denting his car--and so I have to walk an extra distance to get to the store, and on top of that, he parks in between two spaces so no one is able to park next to him. I told her that I'm going to mention this to him. She said something to the effect of, "He'll turn it around and say, 'What you can't walk, what are you a cripple?'" I tried it to see if she was right. As we were walking from the back of the parking lot where no one but him parks his car, he sarcastically said something like, "[o]h yeah, the walk is so far, I need a mineral water" [because we just came from a warehouse where he had bought boxes of mineral waters wholesale]. (You can't teach _aerospace engineering_ to a pig! It only wastes your time and it pisses off the pig!)) If she doesn't do one of these things, then she'll lecture you and/or chastise you about a different topic. Also, by winning an argument with a bimbette or by pointing out to her some mistake that she made which involves you, she will get mad at you for making her have to be aware of how her brains failed her and how her morals aren't up to par. This is because she considers herself to be a _sacred cow_. Also she thinks that the act of you pointing out faults of hers is what makes the faults turn into real facts and therefore you are the one making her not as smart and/or moral as she would prefer to be. Another reason she will get mad at you if she makes a stupid mistake that's your business or if she is nasty to you and thus you teach her that she was being stupid and that she is amoral is because the stupid don't have _emotional intelligence_ or _common sense_. Also anyone who thinks that they are so superior that they can do no wrong and are above reproach is narrow-minded. Another thing she will do to lash out at you for having proven to her that you've won an argument with her and to also futilely try to prevent you from knowing that you have and from knowing that you're opinion is the correct one or merely for just pointing out things to her that make her feel inadequate, is she is going to patronize you in a sarcastic voice or in a sarcastic/belligerent/angry voice. That's always a sign of frustration. She gets mad at herself as well as you. And she will patronize you when you prove her wrong because she'll know that she can't pull off telling you that you're wrong about the thing you've just said because you won't believe her, so she will rebut what you tell her without speaking directly about what you've just told her. For example, if your hobby is painting and if an airhead who's never seen one your paintings lies and tells you that you suck balls at painting, and so you tell her that you've won painting contests, that you've sold some of your paintings, that a mutual friend saw one of your paintings and asked you if he can have it and he put it in his living room, the airhead might respond to this by saying, "Yeah you're Picasso!" Or if you tell her that you were on your high school football team and if even though she had never watched you play football, she assumes that you were a lousy football player and she tells you this, and so you tell her about touchdowns you've scored, field goals you've kicked etc., she might say, "What do you think, you're Joe Namath?" Or in a sarcastic voice, she might say, "You're the man!" This is because she knows that she can't get away with saying to you, "[n]o, you can't paint your way out of a paper bag," or "[y]ou scored, twenty-eight touchdowns and you ran a hundred yards to score a touchdown once, but nonetheless you still can't play football to save your life" and she thinks that making fun of you is a way of tricking you into thinking that you don't know what you're talking about and that you've failed to convince her and it's a way of talking around what she has just been told. Also, because you are arguing with her and because stupid people think that they can get everyone in creation to believe anything whatsoever, she'll immediately make up a stupid-sounding lie to refute the points you've made. For example, say that you tell her you got hurt in a car accident and she therefore assumes you drive drunk. After having to prove to her you don't touch alcohol, she'll not know she has lost the argument and she'll want to claim still that the accident is all your fault. She'll make up something to tell you with confidence. Maybe she'll tell you that you never learned to drive. Or maybe she'll tell you that there was a billboard ad for suntan lotion with a woman in a bikini and so you became distracted. If she does, then you tell her how someone broadsided you while you were sitting there waiting for a red light to turn green. She'll maybe make up a quick lie about how you blew a red light and so the other car had the right of way. You'll tell her you distinctly remember the light first being orange and you slowing down to a crawl and you being glad that the light turned red because that gave you a chance to change a CD in the CD player. She'll quickly think up another lie to back up her last lie. The lie that comes out of her mouth will occur in a little over a second after you finish speaking. This lie might be that you unknowingly were wearing sunglasses thinking you had on your prescription eyeglasses and so the light now this time was actually green but the traffic lamp was too far away for you to see. This might lead to another argument because she doesn't believe you when you tell her that you don't wear sunglasses, which leads to another argument about garbanzo beans. Or you'll fly into a blindfold rage and scream out at the top of your lungs like a maniac, "I ALREADY PROVED TO YOU DUMBASS A YEAR AGO I HAVE 20-20 VISION AND THAT THOSE WERE FAKE EYEGLASSES I WAS WEARING BECAUSE I WENT TO A COSTUME PARTY AS GROUCHO MARX, IT WAS HALLOWEEN, THAT'S WHY I HAD ON THE FAKE MUSTACHE ETC. ETC. ETC!" Or maybe instead, she'll tell you that you were possibly texting while driving--because very frequently stupid people do pose their lies as questions on account of them having an inkling that they're being stupid. Then you respond with, "I've never bothered learning how to use the texting feature on my smart phone!" Then she'll counter, "You shouldn't text while driving! You might get into an accident!" Or you'll say, "I didn't blow the red light! Plus there was a crossing guard right in front of me who made a stop sign to me with her hand and I stopped my car, then she waved on a bunch of first graders to cross the street and she testified in court that I was just sitting there! Besides, there's no billboard with a woman in a bikini anywhere!" She'll say, "I never said there was."

 

People who are mildly retarded or borderline mildly retarded or slow haven't much of a thought-process and much of an imagination, so they are more easy to deal with than anyone who's got a normal brain but a very very very stupid one.

 

Stupid people don't always know when you're giving them an example of something in order to supply a piece of information as evidence or when you're giving them an analogy in order to better illustrate a concept or to compare two similar ideas or to emphasize a point. They might think you're changing the subject on them or they might know what you're doing, but can't see the comparison. They also aren't always smart enough to comprehend expressions such as plays on words, idioms, metaphors, similes and exaggerations. Use an expression, then sometimes (a) you'll make them wonder what you mean (like "conquer a woman" to mean have sex with a woman) and (b) they will take you one hundred percent literally and seriously talk to you about how your expression can't be so (like "So-And-So has more money than God" "such and such is as big as all outdoors") and (c) they'll have their own interpretation of an expression ("lend me your ear"). Nor can they always tell when someone is very very very " " " " blatantly joking around and being silly and being sarcastic.

 

Stupid people are so stupid that they don't know what their closest relatives, closest friends and significant others whom they've known for many many years are like.

 

If you are in an argument with a very very stupid person, or if they just want to upset you for some reason or if they want to make someone else look bad, they often make up extremely narrow-minded lies to tell you that they know aren't true. The reason why even things that they say which they know to be bogus are narrow-minded is because that's the only way that they know how to think. The lies are either blanket statements about precisely how billions or maybe just millions of people are all of one mind, the ways of the world, or about particular individuals not being smart enough to have noticed some fact of everyday life or not being smart enough to automatically know how to do something that takes no brains and/or to be taught how to do it. Or the lies are things like how people are crazy based on them being silly by pretending to do something that if they were serious would be bad or if they're doing something the shithead bore witness to them doing that the shithead perceives as odd or is something that he can make a case for being odd. The lies are also about how people other than the shithead lack morals.

 

When stupid people delude themselves of things, their delusions are sometimes narrow-minded concepts.

 

Stupid people don't know which particular things you tell them or what things that they've noticed are important enough for them to remember and why they are.

 

Stupid people don't know what things they tell you or do to you or do right in front of you or say out loud to themselves with you listening or say to others in your presence aren't unimportant or things you won't find strange or are things that you'll deem as total horseshit and so they forget and think you will too.

 

Stupid people operate under the theory that declaring something out loud magically transforms it into a fact. So too does shaking their heads "yes" when they are in the course of verbally lying to themselves and to others about a falsehood being a fact or right after they finish their last sentence about it.

 

Stupid people are of the opinion that if they act like something is true, that means it is or that it used to be. Stupid people also think that if you yourself act like something is true that they overmuch desire to be true, that in real life is so not true, then the sole fact that you personally are acting like it's true means that it is true. (You can even do such things like changing what form of government a country has ALWAYS had all by you and you alone behaving in a certain way [talk about power!]. Did you know that you are someone who can turn a dirt poor nobody into a multi-billionaire conglomerateur without you doing a single thing? I.e., just from you not answering a megalomaniac back.) This is why so many stupid people indignantly try to get other people to act like things that they've revealed that they know to suck big gay donkey cock are 'the tops'. This is akin to a young child yelling, "TAKE IT BACK! TAKE IT BACK! TAKE IT BACK! TAKE IT BACK!"

 

The thing that stupid people assume the most about other people is that they're stupid. Besides stupid people always managing to find ways of pegging people as stupid, the other most common things that stupid people peg people as are "amoral," "nutcases," "weirdos," "pussies" and "egomaniacs" based on small things or absolutely nothing. (NOTE: Stupid people incorrectly pegging people as being egomaniacs are ALSO instances of incorrectly pegging people as stupid. To state the obvious, this is because it's stupid to have an oversized ego and because someone who is a drop wise would realize that they have an ego and they would conclude that it's stupid to be egomaniacal and they would know that the things that they are conceited about are stupid and they would know when it's obvious to other people that they have egos, and whenever it might possibly be slightly apparent to other people that they could have egos but not definitely, they would suspect it. Stupid people also incorrectly pegging people as pussies is another way that stupid people incorrectly peg people as stupid. For example, stupid people incorrectly think that people are scared of things that if they really were scared of, they'd be being stupid.)

 

Stupid people don't stop to think about what's going on inside of other people's heads.

 

Stupid people don't know that everyone can read them just like print.

 

Stupid people think that everyone else is stupid too.

 

Stupid people think that everybody who is a member of a different group than them (such as a race, religion, country, gender, social class, age range, types of jobs etc.) all share the same brain. Stupid people also think that they know precisely how smart and moral the people of other groups are. And stupid people also think that they can crawl into the brains of people who are different than them to deduce what their goals are, what their likes and dislikes are and what their methods of operating are. The types of groups could also be things like all people who go to night clubs, all football fans, all people who place ads or answer ads in the personals, all hippies, all playboys, all really handsome men and beautiful women etc.

 

The dumbest of the dumb think that if someone merely but one time was to do something pathetic or that isn't kosher or a little out of the norm, that means s/he's been doing it regularly and won't ever stop.

 

A mental lightweight thinks that most people don't have a high enough intellect to do particular things that practically no one--not even dummies--are too stupid to do.

 

Those who don't have normal intelligence are of the opinion that you aren't allowed to know correct information if the information is something that they wish to be untrue. Convey to them that you know some fact that perturbs them (especially if it's about them) and you can expect them to lash out at you in an indignant fury. They also think it's their prerogative to carry out disciplinary actions against you which they deem appropriate as though you are their minor child or a serf in their serfdom if you know something to be true that they are declaring a "thought crime" to have as an opinion due to its truth being something that happens to bruise their egos and/or that means that they're in a bad way. For them knowing that you know what the God's honest truth is, they'll deem you stupid and amoral. Also they think likewise about you having something that they covet or for you being better off than them.

 

When you point out to really stupid people specifically why they have conjured something stupid up in their heads, they're not intellectually capable of recognizing that you've just explained their thought-processes to them. This is because they have not a whit of self-awareness. Whenever two or more people spell it out for them, they don't take into account that since a number of different people are all thinking the same thing, it might just be easy enough to see. They don't know that the higher the number of people who think something is, then the higher the chances are that these people are right. Stupid people don't notice that they're having the same thing be told to them by more than just one person, but for discussion purposes, let's say that they did: they would not deem it pertinent in the least. Not only that, when you point out to them that someone else also explained to them why they think something stupid and so it's not just your opinion that is why they think it, they STILL STILL STILL STILL don't deem that pertinent.

 

Stupid people think that if they are to become hip to any one single little lone individual in the whole entire world who has done something peculiar, then this means everyone does it.

 

Stupid people are violent because their brains are primitive.

 

With some stupid people, you sometimes need to get EXTREMELY specific in order for them to know what you mean. For example, if you were to tell a stupid person that your father has a gold mailbox, this might make the shithead mad because the shithead might think that you live in a _fantasy land_ because you pretend that you're a blueblood, or that you are lying to him about you coming from money. You might need to say, "My father's mailbox is the color 'gold.' And it's made out of tin." Or, say to a stupid person, "I brought my umbrella with me," the goofball will not necessarily know that you are preparing for rain. Or if you say to a stupid person, "I bought cat litter in two different stores," the stupid person could possibly think that you are saying that you bought a bag of cat litter at a store and then you bought that very same bag of cat litter that you already own at another store. In order for him to know what mean, you might need to say, "I bought a bag of cat litter at Petland and a few days later, I bought a whole nother bag of cat litter in a supermarket." Here's a real life example. Once I was hanging out with a shithead whom I shall call Captain Crunch on a street. Some girl came by, she spoke to the shithead. Then she runs up to her apartment to get her dog and comes back down under the guise she needs to walk her dog. She comes back up to the shithead to talk to him. When the conversation ends, as she's going back to her building, in an angry voice that meant he's venting, the shithead starts making fun of her for being ugly and explains how she came back out of her house in mistakenly thinking she could get to hook up with him. In all likelihood, she'd heard him since she was around nine feet away, maybe eight feet away when he started talking. I.e., she heard his voice, but there's a remote chance that she wasn't paying attention to what he was saying. I thought that he was unintentionally talking too loud like anyone would. I told him that she can hear him. I don't remember all of what he told me next. It had to do with how I'm being stupid and he apprises me that now might be the last time they ever see each other. At the time, I inferred that he probably thought that I was pondering the possibility of him getting into trouble with her in the future because of how they both might cross paths again and so she's going to recognize him and maybe want to beef or just that she'll give him a dirty look or something like that. If he didn't think that was what I was worrying about, that was precisely the point he was trying to make. I wonder whether the reason why he thought that I seemed like I felt bad was because I was feeling bad for him? Or this was another case-in-point of him not being able to read people, so he didn't know how I felt? Knowing him, he thus pegged me as a _punk_ by ascertaining that I panicked a little and from there, concluding that I must think that he's a punk since I'm one and so I think that he would be dreading the prospect of himself getting in trouble with the girl. Then again, maybe I'm not even warm on any account? It's sometimes as hard to interpret a shithead's words as it is for them to interpret someone else's. Since shitheads don't know what people are like, you might not have a clue what is not a thorough enough thing to tell them. For example, if you tell a shithead that you have to pick up your clothes at the cleaners and it's three a.m., in a million years it wouldn't occur to you that the shithead is going to tell you that they're not open this late and that you have to go during the daytime. The reason why he started ranking on her looks is because shitheads get mean all of the time.

 

It is not just my own opinion that leaving no room for another interpretation of a simple little sentence is a major way people's intellects have previously failed them. My girlfriend's deceased husband was a psychiatric social worker and he once explained to her that he asked one of his patients, "so what brings you here?" and that he responded with, "the bus" and that he told her that this is "concrete thinking."

 

This is a definite side effect of an extraordinarily lesser intellect. In movies that are comedies and in situation comedies, to show a stupid character being stupid and to get across that the character is supposed to be stupid, the writers have them do this. A stupid uncle of mine did this almost every time I spoke to him over the phone. In a typical conversation, he'd do it either once, a few times to a handful of times. He did it to everyone.

 

(She explained to me that republicans who can't think outside the box and who can't think in a way other than they're used to is another example of concrete thinking and she called them stupid. I asked her if concrete thinking is also not being able to get old ideas out of your head because the ideas are set in concrete, and she said yes. She explained to me that there was this rightwing character that this comedian Stephen Colbert pretends to be and that Bill Maher once said that he wanted to debate the rightwing character and that some republican in an internet chatroom wrote something about Bill Maher being stupid for not knowing that the character is not a real person. She explained that that was because stupid people don't understand sarcasm. If I remember right, and I'm almost certain that I am, she said that this is a case of concrete thinking. She told me to go get her telephone that's on her bed and so I went into our bedroom and saw that the telephone was on the TV stand and then I went back to her and told her that I didn't bring her her telephone because it was on the TV stand and not the bed, so she told me that I was being concrete.)

 

Stupid people sometimes hold opinions that are somewhat common--meaning they might think things that one doesn't have to be of an inferior intellect to think, but the fierceness that they hold their opinions is by no means common. Plus their thought-processes which lead them to arrive at their opinions usually are different than the thought-processes of the normal people who also hold their exact same opinions. Plus the amount of non-stupid people who share their opinions is mostly always a low amount. I'll give some brief examples. A low IQ uncle of mine was the squarest mofo in human history and stupid people think that what's best for them is what's best for everybody else and that they are a prototype for the rest of humankind and they don't always have a sense of what isn't a matter of life and death and so we once debated my assertion that colleges shouldn't force you to take two years of liberal arts classes until you can take other kinds of classes and that as long as people can do basic math like adding, dividing and know fractions etc. and can read and write etc. that this is enough and that people already learned all this in high school, so I should be able to take classes that will help me in my chosen field and that will be useful in life and he was "rabid" in his opinion to the contrary. In 1983 or in 1984, I complained to a friend of mine about that. My friend told me that my uncle was right since the liberal arts classes "better yourself," but he didn't feel passionately about it and he only thought that it mattered a tiny fraction of what the dope did. The other day for about the fourth time, a friend of mine who's smart recently told me that I'm wrong for thinking that women and girls in public don't notice me anymore because I got heavy and that the real reason is because I dress so badly. That's not true, I sometimes have on a nice coat or jacket and when I do that doesn't make a bit of difference. A former low IQ friend once peremptorily explained to me that girls won't ever under any circumstances go out with any guys unless they dress well.

 

He preceded to point to my sneakers and explained something stupid about my sneakers (all black Reeboks) and that no girl will go out with any guy who is wearing the sneakers I had on if he is wearing them when he asks her out. And then the blue-collar lughead moved his index finger up to my coat and explained more stupidity to me with absoluteness that meant he was referring to every female there is and I was able to tell not just from his words, but from the sound of his voice, expressions and body languages that he didn't mean "just in general"--he meant no guy in the whole entire world who was dressed the way I was could get a date with as few as even one girl in the whole entire world. (There are other reasons he thinks this, but for brevity's sake, I will leave them out.) [An adult who only cares about someone's physical appearance whom they're involved with romantically would have to have a low IQ.] He told me that no girl will go out with me if I'm wearing the coat I had on when I'm asking her out. To add insult to injury, a few minutes later we parted ways, I got on a subway and a black girl about fifteen tried to get me to hit on her. I didn't, so she got a black man in his twenties to take her phone number. Also, in that same conversation, he told me with total authority that all rich people drive luxury cars and I could tell that he didn't mean just 'generally speaking', but I digress. A few years later, when I went to Pennsylvania with his girlfriend and her sister, I told them that he once explained to me that all rich people drive luxury cars and that he seemed like he meant that he was referring to a hundred percent of the rich people in the world and not just a large percentage of them and then she declared, "He meant one hundred and ten percent." All because Captain Crunch is immoral (a career criminal, a lifelong criminal, a meanie), he got the idea in his head everyone else must be (we make him look like a choirboy) [no matter how long he lives, he will never in his life notice that most people are NOT bad] and so that day we went to Pennsylvania it was to go to a house in a rural part of Pennsylvania. I told Captain Crunch's girlfriend and her sister that the simple asshole must not leave his bags in the car when he stops by the house--with the logic someone will break into the car and take them. They both simultaneously told me that's the case. (They park the car way up high on a big hill a hundredsomething feet from the road. If someone were to break into the car, they're going to have go up or down a very steep hill to get to it. If they're going down, they'd be coming from the woods.) I complained to my father about that. He responded by saying that he will lock the doors to his car when it's temporarily parked in the driveway (meaning right outside his garage and not close to the road), however he didn't assume it's a coin toss regarding whether even with locked doors that anything costing a few hundred dollars would be gone by the time he comes back (within a few hours). On his way back to his car, he's not shitting a brick. When he looks in his car and sees his stuff, his mind is not blown. And his mind doesn't keep on getting blown whenever he comes back to his car.

 

Stupid people who care about something deeply and who think that stupid things and trivial things are of the utmost importance will therefore automatically take it for granted that everybody does. It doesn't even matter if it's something unusual. (I, believe it or not, know of many (not "some," "many") case-in-points of shitheads assuming that everyone cares about things that the shitheads are literally the only ones to ever care about (at least as far as people I've met up till now goes. I can name one particular thing that only two people I've met in all the years I've been alive care about--and a shithead assumed that the whole world does too since he was one of these two). If they are to ever find out that there is some soul somewhere on the surface of the earth who doesn't share their opinion, then they think that that person is wrongheaded because he deliberately chose to not attach any importance to something that must have definitely without a doubt occurred to him because there's no possible way it couldn't have not occurred to him (their logic being that everyone is like them), or the person is ignorant because it didn't occur to him. Upon that, the shitheads conclude that all they have to do to get this person--no matter who he is--to come around to their point of view is to but spend a couple seconds lecturing him about it.

 

Stupid people deem things "monumentally important" that are in the real world approximately as important as dogshit (give or take).

 

If something of substance is not a stupid person's cup of tea, s/he will oftentimes deem the thing 'stupid'.

 

Stupid people also think that normal everyday things are stupid and that things that your average person strives for are stupid. For example, my friend, whom I'll call Deep Throat complained to me a few times that this former low-IQ friend of ours told him that he lives a stupid life. Deep Throat had had a 9-5 job at a law firm, and our former friend thinks this is stupid. Since then, Deep Throat got promoted and was making six figures and had his own office. Captain Crunch couldn't conclude that Deep Throat should stay at his job since it's a large corporation with growth opportunities because the stupid can't plan _life strategies_ for others. Another reason Captain Crunch thinks that Deep Throat lives a stupid life is because Deep Throat had gone and told him what kind of job he has and it's in every shithead's genes to get stupid when it comes to other people and jobs.

 

Another reason why this simpleton thinks Deep Throat's life is stupid and why he thinks other stupid things about Deep Throat's life is because a person's life is something major and if a stupid person talks about something major and something that's serious, he usually has to mention numerous stupid things--especially if it's concerning the subject of people. One other reason Captain Crunch thinks Deep Throat's life is stupid is because Deep Throat has a job that Captain Crunch would rather poke out his eardrums with a screwdriver than have. Captain Crunch is blue-collar and a career criminal and white-collar jobs are poison to him. This is because blue-collar jobs attract the stupid like magnets. It's not that stupid people are too stupid to use their brains and so they settle for having to work with their hands--they just prefer being blue-collar when they work. One reason Captain Crunch thinks that Deep Throat's life is stupid is because Captain Crunch thinks that Deep Throat is "a follower" for working for someone else and "unoriginal" and "ordinary" for thy. This is because stupid people have their own special outlook--and so special that even though there are almost seven billion people on the planet, no one else would likewise conclude the same things. Yet another reason Captain Crunch thinks Deep Throat's life is stupid is because Captain Crunch can't understand how anyone could desire Deep Throat's job. Stupid people often think that they have to understand things in order for the things to be correct. Plus, 'to each his own' is in no way shape or form the motto of people if they happen to be unbelievably stupid. Another reason why the shithead thinks Deep Throat's life is stupid all due to him having a white-collar job in a law firm is because one of the tippy top surefire ways to cause a shithead to assume at least one thing that is so stupid that no one who isn't a shithead could assume is to tell him what kind of a job that you have. None of the other seven billion people in this world would get the idea in their heads that someone is a follower and that they're just going with the flow and that they don't have the brains to come up with a plan to make money without being on a payroll at a large corporation and that they are living a stupid life if they work as a proofreader of documents in a law firm. I think that Captain Crunch also thought that Deep Throat didn't want the job that he has due to it being a white-collar job and due to him being employed at a large company. If Captain Crunch did know that Deep Throat wanted the job, then Captain Crunch thought that it was very stupid of Deep Throat to want it. This is because stupid people are always coming up with unique ways of assuming that other people are stupid. If you tell a shithead what kind of job you have, there is a chance the shithead will think you are presenting evidence that you are stupid. He also on that note might display that it's not just you who's stupid, but people in general are stupid.

 

Stupid people have trouble telling the differences of other people who to their dumb asses are similar and so they unintentionally lump them all together. E.g., a nine-year-old behaves as infantile as a five-year-old. A seventeen-year-old is about as wet behind the ears as an eight-year-old. In a state where _majority age_ is eighteen, a father is still an authority figure to his nineteen-year-old son or daughter and to the same degree he used to be a decade earlier. A Sikh is an Arab. (Aside from them looking a drop alike to the stupid who have trouble telling apart an Indian with a turban and an Arab with a _ghutra_, I know personally--on account of me having a former blunderhead friend--that one of the reasons some people of low intelligence mix up Indians, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis with Arabs is because they think India is in the Middle East and because they still have yet to learn that in India, they are mostly Hindus.) I remember a Chinese man selling martial arts self-defense VHS tapes in an early 1990s infomercial saying that he came to America shortly after WW2 and that a redneck stepped up to him--along with a group of friends intending to do him harm--and apprised him that he bombed Pearl Harbor, or something like that. So the Chinese man rationally explained that it was the Japanese who did that and that he's Chinese and that the Chinese fought against the Japanese in the war and that he was on America's side, yet nonetheless, he had to use kung fu on the redneck seconds later. The redneck's friends wisely backed off. I once had a friend whom I'll call Princess Leia and she and Captain Crunch used to be a couple. In either 1999 or 2000, Princess Leia told Captain Crunch Princess Leia that she was bringing kids she used to baby sit to the Bronx in order to make ceramic cupcakes at a ceramics studio. has a platonic male friend who is of Korean descent and was born in the Bronx. Aside from the fact that it is a thought pattern of shitheads to think that males and females can't be platonic friends, Captain Crunch had very recently broken off his engagement to Princess Leia because he got the idea to drop her for a different woman and he was secretly talking to the woman he wanted to leave her for over the phone and communicating with her through e-mails, IM's, in chat rooms etc. (she lived across the country, so they couldn't meet up so easily), but then he decided against hooking up with the new woman and it is also a thought pattern of stupid people who cheat on their significant others to think that they must be doing it to them too or at the very least, they devise plans to do it and that if someone came on to them unexpectedly they would get it on at a drop of a cloth (because stupid people think that everyone is exactly like them and so everyone wants to do what the stupid people want to do). (They started dating in January 1993, he started interacting with the woman he planned to leave her for in approximately or exactly January 1999. Then they broke up in February 1999 because she figured out that there was someone else. As soon as they got back together after having been together for six-plus years is when it strikes this fool that she could very well have another man.) So since Princess Leia told Captain Crunch that she went to the Bronx and why and since Captain Crunch thought that he smelled Chinese food on her and since John is Korean, Captain Crunch concluded that she went to the Bronx to get it on with John because Korean-Americans and Chinese are the same. That is to say, if she had eaten Chinese food (she never told me whether this is so), that's a clue that she was in the company of someone whose parents are from Korea. Captain Crunch and Princess Leia had a number of big fights about this topic and another reason they kept fighting about this topic on different days had to do with how since stupid people think that everyone is like them, Captain Crunch thinks Princess Leia must be a bad person like he is and so she must not have the morals to not go behind his back with someone else. She told me that she said to him some words to the effect of, "It's funny how right after Angela (a new name I'm now giving the woman he got the idea to leave Princess Leia for) is when you start thinking I'm two-timing you." She might have even told me about some other time that she apprised him of how he assumed that she was cheating on him merely because he conversed with some other girl over the internet and over the telephone (and nothing more) in the hopes of her panning out to be his Mrs. Right, but even if it was just once that she did, this is a perfect example of how a shithead doesn't know when someone is explaining his own line of reasoning to him!!! I vaguely remember on two different days her telling me that she told the buffoon that he thinks that she cheated on him because he used to want to cheat on her, but she could have been referring to just one time that she told it to him. Knowing her, she brought it up to him more than once, and probably at least thrice. She has a childhood friend whom I'll call Mrs. Doubtfire who's mildly retarded or a few notches higher from mildly retarded and once Princess Leia was explaining to me that Mrs. Doubtfire doesn't know two things, but that Mrs. Doubtfire (as an adult) kept explaining to her that if a guy keeps accusing you of cheating on him, that this means that he's cheating on you. Princess Leia explained that Mrs. Doubtfire learned this in high school from having dated Puerto Ricans. The reason Puerto Ricans who aren't faithful to their girlfriends think that they're girlfriends aren't faithful either is because Puerto Ricans are genetically stupid and subhuman (in more ways than one).

 

Another thing that's worth mentioning is that Princess Leia's Korean friend is maybe the only man who actually exists that the shithead accused her of getting involved with in a non-platonic way due to the shithead's logic that if he is thinking about cheating on her, she must be not only thinking about cheating on him, but that she's actually doing it. In other words, those many many many men that the ass-clown accused her of having gotten involved with had never existed except in the shithead's tiny brain. They were not real people. They never walked the earth. They were never even a twinkle in their mother's eye. They were as real as the Easter Bunny.

 

I've noticed that stupid people's assumptions that don't have to do with people oftentimes have to do with animals. Narrow-minded assumptions about animals. If they don't even know people, they can't be expected to know what animals are like. Example one: A former friend of mine whose brain has significantly less brain cells in it than normal kept telling me with dead certainty, absoluteness, knowingness and authority that a dog I had was crazy on account of the buffoon witnessing my dog growling at me in anger and snapping in the air when I pulled him away from the shithead because he was annoying the shithead by sniffing the shithead's leg.

 

Shitheads assumptions have to do with animals because they're trying to think outside their box via getting inside the heads of another being other than themselves. Also he didn't know that the dog was just being a dog.

 

This was a lhasa apso. I've had four of them and they all bit me all of the time and they all snapped in the air to try to get me to back off and growled at me. I was walking one of them a few months ago and a couple in their sixties and/or seventies told me that they've had lhasa apsos and so therefore the man asked me, "Is he 'snappy'?" while speaking in a voice and with an expression that meant that he knows that what he was asking me is more than likely. My aunt calls them "a bad breed."

 

It's a shithead's job to make assumptions about people being crazy, so he made an assumption about a dog being crazy on account of how people like dog's are living beings.

 

Also, the shithead didn't know that since my dog wasn't a _working dog_ it wasn't in his genes to obey me and so you can't compare him to breeds of working dogs. Nor was my dog as smart as a working dog. Therefore he did not know that I was just trying to separate him from said shithead.

 

Example 2: this same shithead referred to his own dog as "a lemon" on account of her peeing out of nervousness in his father's garage the first time that he took her to his father's house. That was the shithead's first dog, and the shithead cannot think broadmindedly enough to conclude that since children pee out of nervousness when they're away from home in strange places, dogs must too and that since even adults have been known to pee out of nervousness, this is another clue that his dog did. If the dog pees once somewhere she's not supposed to, then she's a downright "lemon" because everything is either _all or nothing_, so the dog can't make a mistake once in her life without being inferior across the board. His girlfriend told me he thus picked up the dog, threw her across the garage and that she hit a wall and then that he pounced on her and beat her with his fists. His brother and sister-in-law, for witnessing that, quickly got in their car and drove home.

 

People who aren't stupid make narrow-minded/uninitiated assumptions about animals, so of course people who _are_ stupid also must have to. I might have learned the concept of narrow-mindedness due to this fact. When I was five or four, my father kept some pet fish in a bathroom sink. He explained to me that my mother might think that if the fish die that all fish that people keep in captivity will die. To state the obvious, what he meant by this is that he thought that knowing her, that there was a possibility that since the fish weren't being kept in a fish tank with a filter and a heater and an air pump, that the fish might die soon and that my mother wouldn’t have a clue about that.

 

He spoke in a tone of voice that meant he thinks that this is how she thinks all around.

 

My aunt was a school teacher who kept fish in an aquarium in her classroom. She didn't read much about the subject, so her fish kept dying, so twenty- or thirty-something years later--in 1993, she started telling me that my fish will die soon and she's been telling me this ever since (it's June 2011 as I'm typing this). People who are and are Not stupid might think that if you are training a wild animal like a tiger or a bear for a stage act, side show or a circus etc. or if you're trying to force it to perform tricks for an audience it's learned and it therefore attacks you, this is because people shouldn't interact with wild animals. Like if you have one as a pet that you raised from a cub or go into a cage with one you know in an animal sanctuary to play with it or if you're petting it, this is just as equally dangerous. On second thought, this is also another case of people thinking that people are stupid because they doubt that people are smart enough to know what the hell they're doing.

 

Stupid people even think that people they've never met or seen before are stupid and amoral.

 

A stupid person thinks people tell lies when they're just talking normally. Bring up to a stupid person something minor which is also something normal and the stupid person might assume you're lying to him. It's only a matter of time. It's the law of averages. That is, say to a stupid person things like "the radiator in my dining room is leaking," "my nephew is moving to Cleveland," "the batteries on the remote control for my television are running low," "Mrs. Hwang is serving spaghetti at a sleepover," "my friend Julio's kid sister has a guinea pig," "someone parked down the block left their car headlights on," "Jerry's cholesterol count was 258 in August," and pretty soon, he will think you're full of shit. He will deem the thing on par with telling him "I can lick thirty tigers today!" When this happens, he might think he knows your motivation behind your supposed lie. What his brain conjures up is usually something cynical and sometimes _off the walls_. Tell three stupid people some harmless thing like that you moved into your parents' house after they died and you don't like the color they had the walls painted, one of the stupid people might think you're going to live with it forever because you can't afford to spring for paint, another might think you're lying about your parents having lived there and another might think that you are lying about your parents having died because you are ashamed that you still live at home and you have an ego and so you are trying to play it off like you have money to have a place of your own. Or if a shithead thinks you're saying something that's not true where you're the only one who could know, he might believe that you think you know what the truth is, but that you're mistaken. Once a coworker argued with me about whether these pants I had were a size 33 waste. Aside from the fact that I read the label a few times since I bought them, my aunt and I both checked the label when we bought them in the store. I bought two pairs of the pants in two different colors and they both fit me the same. (The shithead thought they were too big to be the waste size I told him because they were baggy because they were Italian. On a previous day, I was sitting next to him and he blitzed me with assumptions about me and we argued about them and they were things in my life that I'm the only one who could've known about them. One of them was a fourth-generation assumption [an assumption of his that progressed from the original to a fourth.]) His assumptions were the three most frequent subjects that shitheads have assumptions about. (1) non-platonic things about other people, (2) other people and jobs (and a common assumption that stupid people assume to boot. I.e., that if someone has a low-paying job, it's their sole source of income and the only money they have in the world and that chump change is serious money to them.), (3) other people and money. (Another coworker at that job used to tell me accounts of the shithead's buffoonery and one of the times he did, I replied, in an inquisitive tone, "He's stupid?" and he declared in anger, "He's a dummy!") A shithead can have more than two assumptions at the same time about an individual statement he hears when it's only theoretically possible for there to be one explanation about why something is a fact or about why something had previously happened. I.e., a shithead can be confident that both of his assumptions about how something came to be are true when it's only possible for one single thing to be true. And sometimes each of his assumptions are so stupid that no one who is at least average in intelligence could assume either of the two things that he does. Also, mention to a stupid person some trivial--even fleeting--thing in your life: like that your laundry turned pink or that you can't find your house keys, well then the shithead might very well think that your opinion is stupid and that he knows the _real deal_. The latter reminds me of another fact. Shitheads sometimes think that you are dead wrong for thinking that you know why you make the considered choices to do things. In other words, if you are to tell a shithead that you decided to do something and that there are, say, two reasons why you decided to do it. The shithead might think that you think that you are right for thinking that you want to do the thing based on both of the two reasons you claim, but you want to really do it based on some other reason and he and not you is the one who knows what in particular this reason is. This is also theoretically impossible. A quick example. Once a shithead believed me about how I think that the reason I don't always count my change is because I know that the odds of it being the correct amount is about a hundred percent and that even if it's less than what it's supposed to be, that's fine with me since it's just a couple of coins and that sometimes I count my change and sometimes I don't and that I usually count bills. However, he assumed that the real reason I didn't count my change the one and only time that he bore witness to is that I am not smart enough to ever learn how to do this kind of basic math that is taught to third graders and that I couldn't learn to if my life depended on it and that years and years and years ago I must have given up bothering to count my change since I am all too aware of how impossible of an undertaking this is for me.

 

All I did to make him assume that was that I handed some cashier two singles for two donuts that I didn't check the price of and then put the two quarters she gave me in my pocket without looking at what denominations of coins I was given. The conversation we had where he thought that I was wrong about all the precise reasons why it is that I sometimes decide not to count my change had taken place a couple years after the day which he had observed me not being bothered with counting the chump change that I was given. My intuition also told me I was given the correct amount. He probably had never even one other time noticed that I don't bother counting coins to make sure that I have received the chump change I'm due. To list all of the times I am hip to that he thereafter let it be known to me and his girlfriend that I can't add or subtract a few extremely low numbers and the two times that I taught him that I can and how he forgot each time and how once he was only able to be taught that I can do various kinds of math for one second before deluding himself and making a low-IQ attempt at deluding me into thinking I've never learned how to do any kind of basic math at all (not even the first kind of math taught to young children in either the first, second or third grade) would take up a few paragraphs. What's also pitiful, and I'm not making any of the following up--even though it sounds like I have to be--is that in either about one second (not as long as a second and a half) or in a little less than one second, he deluded himself that I can't do math on a calculator and some other day after that, he was unable to learn for more than a 'eat that I can add a few numbers on a lunch check that I split that came to only about fifteen dollars and twenty dollars upon watching me do it. That is to say, a waitress gave us one bill for what we both ordered and I separated what he ordered and what I ordered and then added up separately what each of us ordered and I had done them both correctly, but he deluded himself that this never happened. I didn't bear witness to him deluding himself of that, but I know that this is what he did and that the reason afterwards he still thought that I can't do elementary school math wasn't because he just forgot that I can. I.e., it wasn't like he plumb forgot that he lied to himself that I did not do math twice right before his very eyes, it's that the most asinine of the asinine don't know what goes on inside of their own minds, so he didn't have an inkling that (1) two times I proved by demonstration that I can do addition and that (2) he purposely decided to refuse being convinced. Mr. Low IQ had over the years two opportunities to make the conscious choice to delude himself that I can't do the easiest kind of math there is and took advantage of both.

 

One of many reasons that he did not learn that I can do basic math even though he bore witness to me doing it that day in the bar, was because upon him finding out that I added everything up right, he realized that his intellect failed him by him drawing the conclusion that I can't do basic math and that this had been his opinion for about two years and that he had discussions with Princess Leia and me about it and shitheads hate with the heat of a thousand white hot suns to conclude that their intellects failed them. Thus, he employed the strategy of deciding to instantaneously forget what he had just found out.

 

Therefore on some other days, the adult let it be known to people that he thinks that I don't have the brains to ever in my lifetime learn how to add or subtract anywhere between two to four numbers that are only two, three, and four digits. The first time that I proved to him that I can do math--whence he got the idea to delude himself that I can't, he reasoned that it was highly likely that after he tells me that I can't then I will automatically take his word for it. If he had succeeded, I would have concluded that I've never done basic math ever before. I would have to have forgotten any of the thousands of times I've ever done math over the years. I would had to have concluded that I've never done math and that I failed all of the math classes I took from elementary school through high school. This would also have entailed me forgetting what grades I've gotten in math classes, that I'd done well on math tests, not to mention all the bookkeeping I've done at past jobs, hundreds of things I've had to figure out in my house over the years, that I passed the three bookkeeping classes that I took and so on and so on. No one could be this stupid. The very next time that we went back to the sport's bar, the waitress put the check in front of me. She combined our drinks on the check and so I didn't know which number the drinks were so that I could split it in half, I didn't want to figure out which food was his and which was mine, decipher sloppy handwriting and so I handed him the check and like I foreknew, he seethed in disgust. And like I foreknew, when he got home, he complained to his girlfriend on the phone that I can't do math and that she'd tell me when she calls me later on that day. I remember that right after he witnessed me not counting my change, I went and sat down at a table and ate one of the donuts I just bought, and he sat there right across from me explaining to me step by step why if you subtract the price of the donuts from two dollars it comes to the amount it did. I was sitting there trying to eat my donut and he's going "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah ..." and he had failed to notice how I wasn't paying him any mind. Then, a few years later, he told me that I can't be a bookkeeper because I don't know how to count my change. I decided to become a bookkeeper and so I told him that I was going to go to bookkeeping school. He immediately filled with disgust and rage and then went crazy vindictively telling me off about how I don't know how to count my change. Before he started speaking, his lower lip curled at the edges and he bounced in his seat like it was on fire and frantically repeatedly shook his head from side to side. His girlfriend told me soon after that he said that he would have really laced into me, but since that was the first time we hung out in a while due to us getting into a fight the last time we hung out, that he'd decided to go easy on me (we got into a fight based on him telling me an assumption). Weeks before I told him that I wanted to be a bookkeeper, I realized that when the time comes that I tell him, that he's going to more than likely tell me that I don't have the brains and on top of that, he'll assume other reasons my idea sucks goat balls and he'll tell me. One reason I saw this coming weeks in advance is because I was pretty aware back then that one of the most frequent ways that the dumbest people on earth think and act stupidly is when they are thinking about concepts of other people having specific jobs or just anything whatsoever pertaining to other people and jobs.

 

I explained to him things like I know how to add, subtract, multiply and divide, but even someone who's bad at math can be a bookkeeper because the math part is done on computers and with calculators and I brought up some other good points, so he got a look on his face for a split second that meant, "I get it, but I don't like it," and then he tried to magically make it all go away by saying, "I don't think it's the right job for you." I figured out that one of the reasons he told me this was because stupid people think that everything is about them. I told his girlfriend about him telling me this, she said, "It's about him.''

 

I foreknew he would tell me that I was too stupid to be a bookkeeper because the most repeated thing that shitheads think is that everyone is unbelievably stupid and so when I told him that I was going to go to bookkeeping school to become a bookkeeper, I told that to him with facial expressions and a tone of voice that meant that I was disgusted, indignant, that I felt insulted, fed up, crazed, upset, extremely angry etc. and then I moved backwards in my chair while turning my face away from the shithead and I sat there in indignation and with my intelligence insulted and all fed up and crazed and angry waiting for whatever the hell was going to come out of the shithead's mouth next. I also knew that he would tell me that I'm too stupid to be a bookkeeper because shitheads often assume that people aren't smart enough to do the jobs that they want to get and to start a business etc.

 

This was at Burger King and anyone who might have seen me would have known that I was indignant and disgusted and fed up etc. and they would have made the logical assumption that this was based on something(s) that the guy sitting across from me at my table had just said and yet he had not at that point given me his opinion. I brought it up out of the blue and I told him in a tone of voice that people use when they're telling someone off for being told something stupid and end what they say with the words, "so there!" and yet he hadn't said one single word to me about it at that point. Another reason I was indignant was because a bookkeeper job is not his kind of job, so if he didn't bear witness to me not counting my change that day, then he would have told me that my idea to be a bookkeeper is bad; with the logic that it's no suitable job for anyone. All of the people that have ever been bookkeepers throughout the ages naively chose a job that's not their kind of job. When I was telling him that bookkeepers do math on a calculator and on computers, so you don't have to be good at math and that I have been doing math my whole life and getting the correct answers and that sometimes I count my change and sometimes I don't and that the reasons I don't always is because it's too much of a bother and that I count bills usually and not coins because the coins are just chump change, he was able to tell that I believed every word of what I was saying, but he thought that I was all wrong about what I think. This is because shitheads frequently think that you don't know what your own motivations are for doing things. They do, you don't. Like if you are doing something and you think that there are five reasons why you've decided to do it, you're not even right about one of these reasons. Shitheads also think that they know all about the details of the lives of strangers and people they've recently met and whom they only know on a _'hi' and 'by' basis_. Also, if he didn't get the idea in his head that I can't do the kind of beginners math that grade-school kids do, then for some other reason he would have reached the conclusion that I am too stupid to be a bookkeeper because if you tell a shithead about a job that you want to have, you are practically begging to be told that you are too stupid for it to work out. If not, then he'll manage to assume other bad things about it. This is because one of the most frequent ways that a shithead thinks stupidly is when it comes to concepts of jobs having to do with other people. I sort of knew this back then, but I couldn't put my finger on it.

 

Also, if he did not bear witness to me not counting my change once, then he would have somehow managed to legitimately have something else to go on about why I am not smart enough to be a bookkeeper because one of the main ways that stupid people get stupid when you tell them that you plan to work at a job that takes a bit of brain or start a business or to buy a business that already exists and the like, is they think that you don't have a big enough brain to not fail at it.

 

Or at the least, they will reveal that you are smart enough to make money the way that you are planning to, but they will make out like they've got something(s) that they have to teach you first. I doubt that I have even but one example of this, yet I know this has happened to other people because this sounds like a way that unfathomably stupid people would behave.

 

Not just counting stupid people trying to win arguments by repeatedly lying to contradict people's points that they make, what else I've noticed about stupid people thousands of times over is that they all think that they can dupe anyone into believing shit about anything anywhere any time. In other words, stupid people think that they can get you to believe any lie that they right then and there conjure up in their heads to tell you about whatever it is that you happen to be talking about or whatever it is that you happen to be physically engaging in at the time and what the rules of life are. They think they can do this to the point where the stupid lie they decide upon hitting you with, if were in actuality true, would therefore change the entire dynamics of it all--and so much so that what you originally thought is 'horribly horribly wrong'. In other words, people who are as stupid as hell think that they can get you to think that you don't know what you know. I have yet to meet a halfwit who doesn't think that they can do this and quite easily. Also, if they genuinely disagree with you about something that you are talking about or about something that you are doing correctly, they won't have the wisdom to know that there's nothing that they can say or do that will get you to agree with them. Example 1. If you are withdrawing money from an ATM machine for the hundred dozenth time, a shithead will think he can get you to agree that you are doing it wrong or that you can be doing it better and that it matters that you can. Or, he might think that he will get you to think that you don't have the right to be withdrawing the money. Like if you're withdrawing a welfare check, a disability check or an unemployment check he will think that you will agree with him for telling you that the money is not rightfully yours because you shouldn't be on the government dole. He'll think that he is either teaching you something new or reminding you of something that you already know or that you're on the fence about it and so he's the cause of you now knowing which side of the fence to be on. Whether this is his genuine opinion or whether he is making this up on the spot, he'll think that he won't be wasting his time by telling you this. (Stupid people are always thinking that you don't have the right to do things. Another thing that stupid people think is that they can trick you into thinking that you don't have the right to do something that the stupid people know that you have every right in the world to do. For example, if you're sitting on a dock, a stupid adult will think that he can get you to think that you don't have the right to be sitting there or that you're doing something else at that moment that you don't have the right to do. You don't own a boat that's tied to the dock, so you don't have the right to be on the dock and/or you have to stop feeding the seagulls your sandwich because that's causing them to gather around and their squawking is bothering the shithead or they will shit all over the dock and the boats or anything else that he invents on the fly. [Or if you are sitting on the dock, the stupid, person will think he can get you to think this is somehow a case of you being stupid. He could tell you that you might get a splinter in your ass or that you might rip your pants on a splinter or dirty your pants or that you're sitting too close to the edge and so you might fall in the water.] Stupid people also think that they can get you to think that someone else is royalty to you and so they can do with you as they please and that you have to lump it and that how you live your life and why is the business of whoever it so happens to be the stupid person either genuinely assumes is royalty to you or is making believe is royalty to you. In a nutshell, stupid people think that they can get you to think that you don't have the rights that you have. Stupid people think that they are "masters of deceit" and the most superbly skilled liars ever. Stupid people think that they are trickier than anyone could possibly be--even geniuses of the highest order. Stupid people are the most inept people there are at lying.) Or if you're withdrawing a small amount of money like $40 to buy a picture frame, he'll tell you that you can't afford to buy the picture frame you would really like to have and so you should withdraw less money for a cheaper picture frame. Then he will stand there thinking that you think he's right and that the reason he's able to know what your finances are is because he's a smartie and that you will promptly take out less money than you would have a few seconds ago and that if it weren't for the fact that ATM machines won't let you withdraw less than $20, you would. One reason I chose to make this up as an example is because one of the most common ways that stupid people think stupidly is regarding other people and money. Example 2. For about five months a few years ago, a friend a mine had been harassed for hours almost every day in the wee hours of the morning, late at night, five-ish to nine-ish in the morning by her upstairs neighbor who purposely stomps on the floors, wears heels and purposely puts them on at odd hours to go to the bathroom and to parade around, she drops things and then picks them up and then drops them again and so on, throws things, runs, rolls things on the floors etc. Before that, for five-plus years, she unintentionally disturbed by friend and her husband and woke them up by wearing heels. She used to disturb my friend's roommate with heels. Her sister and her girlfriend lived in the apartment for two years before my friend moved into the apartment and so my friend's enemy disturbed my friend's sister and her girlfriend the same way. They all mentioned this to her--she wouldn't stop. My friend bought her a pair of slippers once. So her sister had a male friend go ring my friend's enemy's doorbell to try to settle everything. Moments before he went to ring my friend's harasser's doorbell, my friend warned the man about this other neighbor who lives right next door to her harasser and told him that said neighbor is going to come on up to him and take the side of her harasser. The neighbor went inside my friend's foewoman's apartment and disclosed that she thinks that the noise might be coming from squatters who could be living on the roof. My friend's foewoman lives on the second floor. It's a three-story building. A few minutes before that, the bimbo had heard them talking and walked up to him when he was standing by her upstairs neighbor's apartment door and promptly lied and said that Miriam isn't making any noise and that it's my friend who is the one making all the noise. Then he turned to her dismissively and declared in indignation, "Excuse me!" Then, he continued discussing the real problem with the harasser and her husband. My friend once overheard her upstairs neighbor and the bimbo in the hallway devising ways to harass my friend with noise. To recap, regarding every subject under the sun, a stupid person always thinks that they can get you to change your opinion about it all and/or that they can get you to think something extra that's radically new about it all. Or at the very least, they think that (a) they can put some serious doubt in your mind as to whether you are correct for thinking something and that (b) they can get you to strongly suspect that each of the untrue things that they're telling you which contradicts your opinion are legitimate facts. As fast as it takes to tell you is precisely how fast they think you are believing them. My friend's upstairs neighbor is a Puerto Rican. Thus, she lacked the intellect to understand my friend when she reminded her that she started making noise first by walking around hundreds of mornings wearing high heels and that she wouldn't listen to my friend who for years kept asking her to not wear her heels in the bedroom in the morning and on top of that, she failed to understand all of the other things my friend had explained to her. If she was capable of understanding, she wouldn't give a shit because Puerto Ricans are genetically morally inferior. She got my friend evicted. These scum should have all just stayed in Puerto Rico because they have no business being around real people in a non-Puerto Rican world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Stupid people think that if they are wondering something about someone that they can put on their thinking cap and within seconds know the correct answer when the answer could be a million and one things. Also, unless they know absolutely nothing about the person due to the person being a total stranger then they never fail to come up with something. When they do, they might know that their assumption isn't a proven fact, and this is one of the few situations they are sometimes intelligent enough to conclude that their assumptions are not definite. For example, if five hundred shitheads have a neighbor who is a stranger to them and if he sometimes leaves his house on foot at 3-ish in the morning and then he comes back around an hour and a half later, then four-hundred-something of the shitheads will decide what he's doing. Out of these four-hundred-something shitheads, some will know they're conclusion(s) might not be true. If the neighbor is a friend, relative or acquaintance to the five hundred shitheads, then the shitheads will know personal information about him which they will use in their figuring and thus the portion of shitheads who believe their assumptions beyond any doubt will be rather high. Some will blend in previous assumptions they made about him to come up with something. What they come up with might not be something the slightest bit new. Like, if they already assumed in the past he's a burglar, then he's doing burglaries. If he has white pants on, he's wearing white pants on purpose so no one suspects he's a burglar. He changes his pants in the men's room of a McDonald's that's open all night. I concocted a story about someone leaving their house for a short spell a few times late at night in order to give an example of a feeb thinking that he can figure out what someone is doing based on the feeb having something small to work with, and then I remembered that I have a real-life example of this. Captain Crunch's former girlfriend's brother when he was in his forties or fifties had sometimes left his house late at night and came back about an hour or so later, so Captain Crunch theorized he was going to a prostitute or more than one prostitute (I forgot which one he explained to me). In a situation where there is an adult male occasionally leaving his house late at night for only about an hour or two, the odds of a Grade A shithead thinking it's got to do with sex or something immoral is approximately a hundred percent. Also, if a shithead thinks it's about burglaries, like in the example I gave, then this has to do with stupid people thinking stupidly about other people and money and other people and jobs because the man leaving his house to do burglaries would make his occupation be burglar.

 

Yet another reason why shitheads think that anyone who's doesn't have a good enough intellect has the same learning disability of a retard and is as naive as a two-year-old and is _brain dead_ is because shitheads think that a human brain to start out with is already a pile of dirt, so anything worse must be like having the most primitive and underdeveloped kinds of human brains possible and like having an animal's brain--and at times like having no brain.

 

Stupid people all manage to find gray where there's no gray. In other words, things that are gray to shitheads aren't gray to anybody else but them. Two examples. A former friend of mine who's way below average once told me that he decided to analyze why our friend Deep Throat dates Patricia (not her real name). He got out a handwritten list of reasons why he thought that Deep Throat dated Patricia and read it to me. One of the stupid reasons the shithead concluded that Deep Throat dated Patricia is because she lived in California and Deep Throat lives in New York and so he traveled on a jet in order to see her. Deep Throat is a pilot and so him being a passenger in a jet mixed up the shithead. I thought that this was sheer stupidity and my intelligence was thus insulted and so I asked the shithead's girlfriend if this sounds feasible, she said "No." Some years later, after Deep Throat broke up with Patricia, I told him the shithead's assessment/assumption and then I asked Deep Throat if one reason he dated Patricia was because he liked going on airplanes and then he got pissed, aggravated and a drop riled and complained to me about how that was a pain in the ass. (The shithead told me that when he told Deep Throat his evaluations that "he was like 'Oh shit!'" As soon as the shithead told me that he decided to analyze why Deep Throat dated Patricia, I was like "Uh-yuh-yie." This is because I have learned that what is probably the most frequent way that all shitheads have their intellects fail them is when it comes to them thinking about non-platonic things about other people.)

 

Another reason Captain Crunch thought that Deep Throat was thrilled to be on a jet airliner is because stupid people think that everyone is a buffoon. Therefore, since Deep Throat hadn't been a pilot for more than a few short years and since Deep Throat only flew small airplanes and gave flying lessons and since Deep Throat wanted to get a job in the cockpit of a jet airliner, Captain Crunch concluded he's some buffoon in Seventh Heaven who gets to be in a top-of-the-line airplane as a passenger. And I would also point out that Deep Throat being a pilot who gave flying lessons and Deep Throat wanting to eventually get a job as a copilot or navigator in a jet and from there some day work his way up to pilot confused the shithead because when a shithead thinks about jobs--especially if the jobs don't have to do with him--he almost always thinks very stupidly. In 2000 or 2001, I was hanging out with this same shithead in McDonald's and a bum came in and mentioned that he was a soldier in World War 2. Lots of jet airliners pass over the neighborhood we were in because there is an airport not too far away. So the shithead explained to me that the reason the bum is in the neighborhood could be because the jets remind him of being in World War 2. I forgot how the shithead worded his sentences, but he explained something about how the bum likes the passenger planes because they remind him of warplanes. The shithead had a tone of voice that meant that he knew that he was only theorizing, but that what he was explaining is not a tremendous long shot. It was a serious possibility though.

 

I can give lots of other examples of other shitheads who've thought that there was gray where there was no gray due to them being confused by things like coincidences and to things that they deemed similarities.

 

Puerto Ricans are the dumbest people since the Neanderthals if you're asking me. Other Hispanics will tell you this. What I've noticed since I was a youth is that all different races of people have deemed Puerto Ricans inferior intellectually AND morally.

 

What I've noticed many times over with different stupid people is that they think that I had a good time doing things that I had no interest in and that I found dull and to the point where I didn't pay any attention to the things that they thought that I was ALL into. The things were things that there was nothing to like and stupid. Some of the times the shitheads were there with me and other times they weren't. I also know of times that various shitheads thought that I had a good time doing stupid things that they think that I do every chance I get that in real life I don't do at all. Once when I was ten or maybe eleven but probably ten a low IQ uncle insisted on taking me to the top of the World Trade Center against my will and so for about maybe twenty minutes I kept sporadically screaming in his face "That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! That's boring! etc. etc. etc. etc." Then, I stopped for a while and I did it again one or two more times until we left. Also before we left I ran out of my house screaming in the hallway. He later failed to notice how I disliked being there (to put it mildly).I don't have ANY recollection about me having noticed that he had failed to notice that I disliked being here, but yet I can state as fact that this was the case. Before we went there, one of the times I was telling him that's boring, we were sitting on couches facing one another and first he had a look on his face that meant he's listening to what I have to say, but deems it all "ridiculous." Then, he had a look on his face that meant that he's zoning me out because there's no reason to listen to me because it's a given that whatever the things are that I was trying to tell him are dead wrong and ridiculous. I can't remember if I told him why it's boring because this was in 1976 or maybe in 1975, but say I did, he would not even have pondered for ten to the minus 35 seconds opening his mind. The logic being that everyone, even an ten- or an eleven-year-old has to be a square if he is (I haven't in my life met another square and I won't ever) and that even if it was possibly conceivable for there to be even but one sole individual in all of creation who would not overmuch admire the view from the top of the World Trade Center and wouldn't have a good time by staring at buildings, you would have to be some kind of a genius to have a credible opinion about you finding the view from the top of the World Trade Center not too interesting if you haven't ever been there before and to have pretty good idea that you're not going to have a whale of a time; otherwise you'll be dead wrong for thinking you will be bored to death--in point of fact, you won't even be a drop bored. It's not going to get old fast. The airhead put on his thinking cap to come up with something that I would like to do, then he drove all the way from Long Island to Manhattan to see it through. That was even stupider than I thought back then because I didn't know this at the time, but this man was the most boring individual to ever walk the earth (that's not just my opinion) and so this makes it even stupider that the ass monkey didn't even ponder for a picosecond the idea of opening his mind any of the many times that I was telling him that the view from the top of the World Trade Center was going to bore me. That's not to say that as a little kid I did not have the wisdom before that day to know that he was boring. I figured that out two years earlier. I had a friend who is an inferior intellect and because he is, he got the idea to break off his engagement to his girlfriend and to make some girl he only knew from communicating with via e-mails and chat rooms and the telephone his wife. She came all the way across the country to meet him. When she got here, he decided he didn't want to meet her, so our friend Deep Throat talked him into coming out of his house to meet her. So his girlfriend talked me into going along with them. Our friend Rich made videos of us all hanging out. There were altogether six people I was hanging out with. I resented having to be with them, so on the train ride downtown, I purposely sat far away from them ALL (in a pretty empty subway car). One reason I resented being there was because one of the people we were hanging out with was a Puerto Rican and he on that account had displayed to me with his words that his intellect was failing him miserably for a few reasons and that he was morally inferior. I already knew he was immoral based on having heard things about him for years and based on being told that he was of Puerto Rican decent. He started acting stupid, egotistical and a dozen or so notches away from rude the exact moment we met. In the very spot where we were standing where we were introduced.

 

Afterwards, Captain Crunch even acknowledged to me how the man was being stupid. And he was displaying that he had a huge ego, which is something that the stupid have. This is because having a huge ego is stupid. Some time after that, Captain Crunch's girlfriend told me about two different times that he declared that I had a good time. One of the times she did, I told her that she saw the video and then I asked her if I looked like I was having a good time. She used the word "compliant" or some similar sounding word with the same approximate meaning that started with a "c" to describe how I looked. Once, she and the shithead decided to spend the day together. So the shithead came up with the idea of them going clothes shopping at Woodbury Commons. One of the shithead's biggest passions is clothing. Over the telephone, she was reading to me an IM she was in with the shithead. The shithead was explaining to her in the IM all about how excited he assumed she was about going to Woodbury Common. After reading to me what he typed, she not asked, but stated, "How inferior is the intellect?" In either the early part of this century or the latter part of the last century, the shithead told me about this ex-basketball player Clyde Frasier who does basketball commentary on the radio. The shithead told me that he used big words all the time on the radio. We listened to him a little once in his car. I thought he was lame. Some time after that, the shithead told me when he's on the radio. I put him on because I used to crack up when Bob Backlund used to use big words right after he became a bad guy and so I deluded myself that Clyde Frasier would not suck like the one and only other time that I heard him. I walked around my room listening a tiny drop to some sentences and I half-heartedly paid attention here and there to other sentences and I totally didn't listen at all to all of the other things people said for the twenty minutes that I had the radio on before I turned it off in disgust because I thought he sucked and because I'm not a basketball fan and I've never seen a professional basketball game and I don't even know when basketball season is and it pisses me off that people like basketball. Soon after that, I told the shithead just in passing that I "checked out" Clyde Frasier on the radio for about twenty minutes. Some time after that, Princess Leia told me that the shithead told her that I listen to him all of the time. There are a lot of reasons why Captain Crunch being a dumb guy thought that I listen to Clyde Frasier every time he's on the radio, but I think only one has to do with a typical inferior intellect, so I will mention it. It's self-explanatory, but to be complete, I will mention it real quickly. Everything is black or white, so he didn't learn from me telling him that I only listened for twenty minutes that this is the amount of time that I spent listening and because even though he knows that to check something out means to just investigate it in a short space of time, he couldn't understand that it is theoretically possible for someone to spend so little time doing something. A basketball game lasts about two hours, so I couldn't have only spent twenty minutes having a basketball game on the radio. I couldn't have not paid full attention to it. Not paying full attention is a gray concept. If you listen to something, you listen to it very carefully and if it's a radio you are listening to, you put your ear to the radio. I couldn't have only had the radio on for one lone Nicks game when there are lots and lots of Nicks games each basketball season because that would be gray.

 

Sometimes you can only get stupid people to suspect that they had been wrong for believing something is true that's important to them that it be true that in real life is not true. This is because if you tell stupid people something that they don't want to hear and they start to suspect that you might be right, before they can conclude that you are right--in order to deliberately not conclude that you are right--they will delude themselves that you are not right. In other words, they will--on purpose--not give any thought to why the suspicion is untrue. The amount of time that they spend suspecting that they are wrong varies between less than one second to a little over a second. I don't think that I know of any instance of a shithead who immediately upon hearing something that he desperately didn't want to hear, having had spent as long as two seconds suspecting that he could be wrong. And when they are in the course of suspecting that the thing is untrue, they sometimes only slightly suspect that it's untrue because they don't spend enough time thinking about it for it to crystallize into a full-blown suspicion. They don't know what's going on in their own brains and so they don't realize that they are refusing to be convinced. The arrogant ones do this the most.

 

Stupid people assume with lightning fast speed. When an idea goes in a stupid person's head, no matter how off-the-walls and stupid it is, he believes it to be true beyond a shadow of a doubt the very instant it goes in his head, then BOOM BAM from that assumption comes a second one, from the second a third and BOOOM BOOOM BOOM BOOM.

 

 

*  What I mean by stupid people thinking that all they have to do is tell you something and you'll automatically believe it no matter what it is, aren't merely things like them trying to soup themselves up and ego-trip and impress you by telling you that they were a linebacker for the Jets when they are 5'2", or that they were kidnapped by aliens and how they escaped and about all of the uber models they've had sex with and have gone out on dates with. Nor am I hardly referring to them thinking that they can trick a typical person out of their money or possessions (as in "a sucker is born every minute," "a fool and his money are soon parted").

 

I am moreover referring to them telling you that you didn't stop watching a specific documentary on television a few days ago due to them not wanting you to know that you did and various other lies about this subject, and them habitually explaining to a pretty woman who has gotten a ton of dates before and who's had boyfriends since she was nine and who gets hit on by men most everywhere she goes and who's seen photos of herself and her reflection in mirrors, who notices men ogling her etc., that no man on the entire face of the earth will ever date her and the very numerous reasons why--thinking she will consequently be deeply depressed and hurt. I know of a birdbrain who used to do the latter with lots of people, not just females (all grownups AND sometimes while they're seeing someone no less). And he actually assumed that he succeeded at it. The only things I remember what she told me that he told her was that she has a big head and that she's fat. He used to tell her these two things a lot.

 

One reason it meant so much to him that everyone but him thinks that their faces are ugly and that they have bad bodies and so no member of the opposite sex finds them attractive and will date them or make out with them or have sex with them is because these are wishes of his that are non-platonic and for some reason non-platonic things are the most frequent things that cause a shithead to be stupid--ESPECIALLY if the non-platonic things have to do with someone other than the shithead. Also fools have foolish priorities.

 

One reason why innumerable times he tried to get people to think that they aren't attractive to members of the opposite sex is because if you have a low IQ, then you don't always like it when other people think something positive about themselves and especially if you know that it's absolutely true and not probably true and you don't always like to give other people credit for things that they deserve credit for and you don't know people well enough to have a general idea what lies you tell them that there's no way that they or anyone could be so stupid that they would believe and you never know when someone knows that you are lying to them and deliberately being difficult, so you are forever wasting your time by telling lies to people.

 

One reason why he made a go at getting her to conclude that no male one will go out with her or have sex with her is because since stupid people don't always like to give other people credit for things, it's his opinion that this is a realistic sounding way of not giving someone credit because he thinks that adults who aren't stupid think that there are some people who can't get any member of the opposite sex to get involved with them in a non-platonic way and so she can be guided into thinking that she's one of them.

 

Since it's this adult's opinion that there are people who no one will date or have sex with, this must mean that it's a behavior pattern of having a mind-boggingly inferior intellect to assume this due to the fact that shitheads are all alike.

 

Once a mutual friend of ours that I've been referring to as Deep Throat was bouncing up and down in his car seat all crazed, furious, riled up, indignant, with his intelligence insulted telling me about some of the many times that the shithead many many years earlier kept trying to get him to think that he is ugly and that no female will have anything to do with him. Not even if he were the last man on the island. The shithead pulled this shit on me in lots of various kinds of ways eleven times starting within the first half hour the very first time I hung out with him. I.e., I told him that I got rejected by two girls. He replied with, "It's not personal. They weren't attracted to you." Stupid people think that people are too stupid to read them, so he thought that I couldn't read between the lines of his words and I couldn't read his tone of voice and his expression. His tone of voice and expression meant that he thinks it's personal but is pretending that he doesn't and it also meant that he is hoping that I take it personally. Once in a telephone conversation that we had one of the numerous times we discussed this subject, I asked him, "Do you think that I can get a girl?" He said, "No-oooo" with a tone of authority, gladness and joy. Then, without me replying to him, he said something to the effect of, "I'm just telling you how it is, you're offended." He thought that he had made be believe that (1) I believed his lie and that (2) I was therefore offended. Stupid people don't know that you have the self-awareness to know your own mind and so he thought that I would take his word for it that there were two things going on inside my mind at the very moment that he was telling me that those two things were going on inside my mind. This is because shitheads assume they can get anyone to believe the most farfetched notions. So I told him about the second to last girl that I got and how it was her idea and not mine that we become a couple. So he made fun of me with the logic that I will be duped into thinking that he's rightly making fun of me and I didn't just win the argument and I'm going to go the rest of my life without getting any female companionship.

 

Said birdbrain even during a handful (or maybe many) telephone conversations he was in with his girlfriend, would habitually try tricking her into taking his word for it that she wasn't at the location she had told him that she was and on top of that, one of the times he did this, he ALSO made a go at having her brand-new opinion be that she wasn't with her friend Leslie. One of the times that he accused her of being out on a date when she was with Leslie, Leslie had overheard him through the earpiece of his girlfriend's cell phone, so Leslie said, "Tell him to shut the fuck up!"

 

His girlfriend complained to me in a fury, in disgust, in indignation etc. like eight times about the different ways he used to try to get her to think that she is unattractive to guys and that no guy would want her (like she just happened to luck out since he exists because she coincidentally came in contact with the only guy in human history who will go out with her. and on top of that, all of the guys she got in the past were the only other guys in the whole wide world who would have gone out with her and they all just happen to live in Manhattan and so this is why she crossed paths with them. he wasn't even being this smart--because in actuality, he wasn't remembering that she had boyfriends and had gotten dates before. but say that he did, he'd think that she wouldn't be).

 

On many occasions, he would think that she wasn't where she said she was because she was out on dates cheating on him when they were talking on the phone or she was just about to meet up with a date due to shithead's thinking that they can know what other people want regarding non-platonic things. This was an idea that he got in his head that he suspected with about a ninety-something percent certainty, but he deluded himself into thinking that it was a hundred percent since he is mean-spirited because he has low morals. Another reason why he wanted her to be seeing someone else behind his back was because he wanted her to not be as moral as she is because he's a sickie. That is to say, he wished a really bad character flaw on her.

 

She once told her mother about how he was always telling her that she's not where she told him that she was and some ways that she would try to prove that she was where she really was and that she's not seeing anyone else and how he would instantaneously dismiss every single thing she said. Her mother, therefore instructed her not to try to teach him because "he doesn't want to learn." Then, her mother finished that thought with, "You're barking up the wrong tree!"

 

At a job that I had in the fall of 1993, there was a bimbette on a telephone I was talking to who kept on trying to dupe me into thinking that I hadn't also been talking to someone who was standing right next to me while I was talking to her. The entire time she was trying to have me believe this, he was standing there with me. The reason she wanted to and just as badly as I want a pet mountain lion was because I was talking to a coworker's brother who came to visit and as I was picking up the telephone, I was answering his question saying "yeah," then the name of the company where I worked; because I didn't want to be rude by failing to acknowledge that he had just spoken to me and the bimbette was deluding herself that she was a business tycoon and was on a power-trip, so she repeatedly tried to have me believe that I don't know that it's not professional to answer the telephones starting with the word "yeah." When I said the word "yeah," I spoke in a tone of voice that meant that I was already engaged in a casual conversation and that I was being distracted by something that was taking place and I mumbled a little. Plus I wasn't speaking directly into the phone and I was speaking in a soft voice. Then, when I said the name of the company where we worked, I spoke in a tone of voice that not only meant that I was initiating a conversation, but it was also a businesslike voice. Plus I spoke louder. I told her at least three times that I was talking to someone standing right here next to me and not her, she didn't want it to be so. Not to digress, but she also tried to wish what I told her into the cornfield. In other words, she tried to magically erase something that had already happened. I.e., one of the times that I told her that I was speaking to someone right next to me, she actually yelled, "NO-OOO!" with total authority, fury, disgust, offense, indignation, all crazed, belligerently, defiantly. This was also another case of the stupid thinking that declaring something is what makes it a reality. She also was under the impression that she had made my coworker's brother vanish into thin air LOL. Not only did the CEO _manqué_ assumed that she could make me think that up until then I had thought that it's professional to use the word "yeah" in sentences when I answered the phones, I think that she either assumed beyond a doubt or at the very least suspected that I might be getting tricked by her into concluding that I had answered the telephones saying "yeah" lots of previous times too.

 

Once a lot of years ago, the shithead who tries to get all of his friends to think they are ugly, had seen a Bret "The Hitman" Hart documentary and he tried to get me to think that I watched the entire documentary and that I was in my living room the entire time that the documentary was playing on a cable channel. I watched almost all of it. We were talking on the telephone about the documentary. He mentioned something that happened in the documentary that was conveyed verbally. It was so easy to grasp that you just have to understand basic English to grasp it. Since I didn't know what it was he was talking about, he assumed that I didn't have the brains to grasp the incredibly simple concept. I forgot what it was because this was so long ago. So he conveyed to me that he thinks I was paying attention but that I am too stupid to grasp what was said.

 

So a second later, I explained to him that I watched the first twenty-something minutes of the documentary in my living room, but then I decided that I wanted to go work on a letter I was writing an enemy, so I went in my bedroom and that I put on the documentary on the television in my bedroom and that I listened to it as I was writing the letter. I told him that my computer cart is set up so that my back was to the television and so I couldn't see the TV and so I would try listening to the documentary while I was concentrating on writing the letter and that I would sometimes stop typing, then turn around to watch the documentary. Then, I told him that since I was missing too much of the documentary that I stopped writing the letter and that I finished watching the documentary in my bed. We argued about the validity of this. I repeated myself to no avail. He was so unconvinced that he complained about this to our friend Deep Throat. The shithead wanted me to be stupid so badly that he thought that he could turn back the hands of time to change it so that I had stayed in my living room by teleporting me from my bedroom back to my living room and on top of that, he could retroactively blow out brain cells inside of my brain in order to make me stupid.

 

One of the many reasons it was so easy for him to delude himself into thinking I watched the whole entire documentary from start to finish is because stupid people are black-and-white thinkers and so he was having trouble with the concept that I didn't watch no less than one hundred percent of it. He thought that it's not theoretically possible for someone to watch part of the documentary and not all of it because if someone were to have merely just watched part of the documentary and then stopped and then went back and watched the rest, then this would be a gray notion and stupid people don't fare adequately with gray notions.

 

The Grade-A shithead repeated to me what it was that the person in the documentary had said, but Captain Crunch didn't have the reasoning skills to deduce that since I understood him when he told it to me, then I would have likewise understood the person in the documentary if I was paying attention when he said it.

 

Stupid people think that before they can say "Jack Robinson" that they can brainwash you into thinking you absolutely love something that is Hell on earth to you and that you love to partake in it. E.g., I had a three-day-a-week job that I got at the end of December 1987. Then at the end of March 1988--after three months of it (give or take a day or two or three or four), I had put in an official request for less days, and on that account, the very next day that I came back to work; within a few minutes after punching in, this pea brain monkey I worked with got the bright idea to say to me, "You should go into the office and ask for more days and if they don't give you more days, you should demand more days!" Then, merely as an afterthought, that ass monkey added the following eleven words, "You shouldn't ask for more days, you should demand more days!" There are a number of things that the man tried to have me believe by investing five seconds of his time to tell me this. One of the things was that working at our job is not only fun, but that it's fun the whole entire time we are there. I worked there, so I knew precisely to a T how boring and monotonous it is and how hard doing manual labor such as putting censors on clothes, taking leather coats out of boxes and folding sweaters is and how hard standing up on your feet for eight hours and fifteen minutes a day is. There was usually no work at all to do, so I would just stand around like a statue (I was actually mistaken for a mannequin there) and having work to do is worse than not having work to do. I once even had to lift a heavy rack of ties all by my lonesome and I dropped it on my foot and creased a new pair of shoes on the very first day that I had worn them. Not to mention that I hurt my foot!

 

When he was advising me how I should try to be the cause of ruining my own life, he was gazing into my eyes with a look of anticipation because he was theorizing that I was either about to unintentionally betray a hint that I was liking his advice (like my eyes could light up [by reflex] or I might go "Hmmmmmmmmmmmm") and that I might even straight-up verbally tell him that I intend to follow through with his advice and then within a handful of days later (tops), actually go do it. That could very well even mean me putting up a fight in the office and not taking "no" for an answer. This is because getting people to do a bunch of things in a row that they would sooner jam needles into their eyes than do can be done _dictum ac factum_.

 

Since I had just asked for less days, if I had asked for more days, then that would have been a case of me trying to do the complete opposite of what I was aching to do but a moment ago.

 

A few seconds after I got the idea to ask the huge shithead to give me less days, I had guessed that within a very very very very very very very short time after I make my desire known, this Puerto Rican might very well give talking me into working more days a quick try.

 

That would mean that within five seconds that I can be made to believe that something that is anathema to me and that sucks possum balls and that is shit on a plate and that nobody wants is actually the opposite of ALL that: it's cat nip and the cat's pajamas AND worth fighting for.

 

A few seconds into this full-fledged adult thinking he just may be in the course of causing the most indolent and fun-loving and home-loving motherfucker the Lord ever let breathe to be at our place of employment doing manual labor the extra eighteen hours a week it would have taken for me to have had as many hours of work as all of the other employees at the store on account of him talking me into kissing my free time goodbye before you can say Jack Robinson, the moron was making his dumb ass excited and glad. The more he spoke the more excited and glad he became. The reason why even though we were practical strangers and casual acquaintances and thus he wouldn't give two stinky pig farts if I got run over by a Mack truck that it meant so much to him that I be a full-timer that he was reduced to deluding himself into thinking that it just may happen very very very soon is because stupid people have foolish priorities. That is to say, he was looking forward to erelong (a) deluding himself that he was a yuppie businessman and to (b) no longer having to be upset that I had more leisure time than he did and that this was a nice perk of me being born into a family that's well off..

 

What makes this man's theory that I might've been on the verge of working my ass off doing manual labor and standing around twiddling my thumbs an extra two days a week even more retarded is that we worked nine-hour days--which is an hour longer than a standard workday.

 

**  My friend Princess Leia's ex-fiancé is a dumb dude who was once offered a two-day-a-week job driving a woman who had a broken leg to and from a doctor's office. It turned out that she didn't need a driver and when he found out that he didn't get the job, he complained to Princess Leia's sister, that the woman just pretended to offer him the job strictly to mess with him. I had balled him out over the phone for thinking this and I apprised him that Princess Leia's sister told the woman with the broken leg what he had said and that she replied, "Poor Princess Leia." He responded to this info by again telling me that she didn't ever intend to offer him the job and his logic why. He didn't have the wisdom to know that "Poor Princess Leia" is not a response someone would have if they got found out. (Like she has nothing better to do than sit around thinking up a way to screw over some absolute total stranger she's never seen before!)

 

***  In November or October 1993, at a deli job I had, there was a manager named Henry who was of an inferior intellect and subsequently he kept getting into arguments with a catering manager, thinking that she needn't leave the premises to sell the food they prepared. This was in all likelihood because since he is way below average in intelligence and thus unbelievably narrow-minded, he thought that if she works at a deli, that means that she works "at" a deli (i.e., inside of the deli and any deviation from this is a shade of gray). One of the people she went to bring samples of food to was a man pushing seventy (I forgot his exact age because this was a long time ago). She was only thirty-eight, but yet Henry assumed beyond a doubt that she was leaving the deli ONLY to go have sex with him and would've bet money on it. A man and a woman meeting on business in an office building during regular business hours is too gray for this lamebrain. I can only paraphrase her, but I'd overheard her explain to a coworker that the reason Henry got that idea in his head was because that's how his mind works because he's a bad person, and she kept repeating herself.

 

She had just gotten engaged to be married some time within a week or two, Henry very likely was aware of this fact.

 

Just as soon as she got back from showing the potential client and most definitely his coworkers the sample dishes she brought them (upon her having gotten twenty-something feet into the deli while heading to her office, that is), she had it out with Henry because he accused her again of having sex with the man who is thirty years her senior. He accused her of this in front of the whole staff. So she explained to him again that she has to obtain accounts by letting people sample their products and that there wasn't anything else to it. She explained that she has been doing this since before he worked there (Henry started at the job three-ish months earlier) and other things.

 

Henry, as a forty-something, could not tell from her tones, expressions, body languages and from what she said to him and from her phrasings that she didn't look or sound mendacious and that she wasn't making anything up at all. She looked and sounded like someone just explained to her that her grandfather was ass-raped by Helen Keller.

 

In other words, the man was too dumb to be able to conclude that she wasn't faking having thought that his assumption was asinine and that she wouldn't be able to bat off many fabricated extemporaneous reasons why she needs to leave the deli that sound so logical without having to stop to think up what to say. He was sort of able to tell that she wasn't acting--BUT--only once or twice and for no longer than either around a microsecond or one and a quarter seconds or both because he dreaded the truth and because he didn't have any respect for the truth. However, he didn't believe all of the other things she told him were true because he wasn't smart enough to realize that everything she said sounded likely and made perfect sense. If I am right for thinking that for about a blink of an eye that he was able to realize that she was telling the truth or at the least suspect so, it wasn't because he was trying to hear it. It was inadvertent in the course of him trying to keep his mind shut. Then, she said, "[g]o back to Burger King" (because that was where he had last worked) and resumed heading for her office--leaving this schmuck standing there under the impression that she is returning from having just gotten laid simply because he says so.

 

Even if Henry himself wasn't immoral, one of the most frequent things that shitheads assume about others is that they're immoral or at the least amoral.

 

There are other ways that shithead's assumption were behavior patterns of being a shithead. The shithead thinking that the catering manager wanted to get it on with the man and cheat on her fiancé had to do with how shitheads all somehow know to make assumptions about other people and non-platonic notions. This is the most frequent thing that they assume. The catering manager wanting to get it on so badly with the man that she can't wait to do it that she has to do it on company time and didn't make arrangements for them both to do it after their workday ends and her not respecting that she was on company time was as assumption that she is a stupid fool. The most frequent thing that shitheads think about others is that they're stupid.

 

I know of about a half a dozen or more examples of Henry assuming things from people's actions that had to do with them being amoral just because he is.

 

Since Henry was a two-bit boss, has a brain with way way way way way less brain cells than most people's brains have and is a scalawag, what this all means is that he used to mess with his fellows by using his low-paying lower-management position to bullshit himself about how he was a very rich and successful business executive while at the same time trying to power-trip them. I have yet to meet a shithead who was a loser and who was a two-bit boss but didn't do these two things and incessantly.

 

 

 

 

PROVERBS & QUOTES

 

 

As a dog returns to its vomit, a fool repeats his folly. (The Bible)

 

Teaching a fool is like gluing together a potsherd. (The Bible)

 

Every fool delights in his cap. (Yiddish?)

 

The fool thinks that all are fools. (The Bible)

 

When water will stand up without earth, the sparrow fly without wings, the raven turn white as snow, and bitter be sweet as honey, then may the fool become wise. (Yiddish)

 

There's no fool like an old fool. (English)

 

A hundred wise men have the same opinion, but fools have every one of their own. (India)

 

It is easier for a camel to jump over a pit than for the stupid to grasp what you say. (Turkish)

 

If befriend donkey, expect to be kicked.--Charlie Chan

 

Who is born a fool is never cured. (Italian)

 

A fool at forty is a fool forever.

 

A fool at forty is a fool indeed. (English)

 

Stupid is as stupid does.--Forrest Gump

 

Fools hate knowledge. (The Bible)

 

The wise man tarries not to instruct the fool. (Chinese)

 

Don't try to explain yourself to stupid people, you're not the jackass whisperer.

 

It's hard to win an argument with smart people, but it's virtually impossible to win against a stupid person.

 

 

_____________________________________

 

                                                            ADDENDUM

 

 

 

Shitheads don't know that it's not possible for anybody to by birth have such a low IQ that you could be completely wrong for thinking that all of the things that you've learned about something long, detailed, unusual and unforgettable by hearing someone talk about it are really true and that the person actually said what you said that s/he said. A shithead also is of the opinion that you could be wrong for thinking that you've found out something by having seen it with your own two eyes. For example, I told an uncle of mine that his sister once told me that she never told him that she was on Unemployment "because he's straight-laced and might not understand." He responded to this by telling me that he never heard that she was on Unemployment and so he was going to ask her if she ever was. He spoke in a tone of voice that meant that he had serious doubts what I said ever happened. Like I could ever get the ideas in my head that (1) she told me that she was on Unemployment and that (2) she told me that she never told him that she was on Unemployment because (3) he's straight-laced and might not understand. Also, he is _the_ most or possibly--but probably not--the second most straight-laced person I've known and moreover a little Mr. Perfect, and this asshole didn't figure that these are extra clues that I didn't get the idea in my head that my aunt told me that she never told him that she was on Unemployment because he might not understand for absolutely positively NO legitimate reason whatsoever. Anyone with a lick of sense who has just met him would conclude that if the little goody-goody finds out you're on Unemployment and if he knows you don't need the money and that you are not looking for a job, this will make him want to puke and this will be disturbing news to him and he will disapprove, yet even though he is this much of a Mr. Perfect, he didn't figure that this is another reason to not disbelieve me. To digress for just a moment, it didn't occur to the shithead that I would not want him to tell his sister this because she would get mad at me for betraying her trust and scold me and because he would be aware of something that she did that she didn't want him to be aware of. I told my friend that my uncle told me this and then she noticed that this was a case of it not occurring to the shithead that I had betrayed my aunt's trust and informing him of something that she didn't want him to know. A shithead saying or doing one thing can be a case of his intellect failing him miserably in lots of different ways.

 

Sometimes when a shithead wants to know something about someone and the shithead is smart enough to know that there's no way of figuring out what the thing actually is, he will make up an explanation and be like "That's close enough. This is now going to be the reason because I say so." For example, once I made a copy of a Sopranos episode on a VHS tape for a shithead and his girlfriend. I had previously labeled the VHS tape "Discovery Channel Documentaries." I guessed that this would make the shithead mad (because he would never watch any documentary on the Discovery Channel because he has no intellectual curiosity and because he needs no intellectual stimulation and because his interests are few in number and stupid people think that no one should do anything that they wouldn't do) and he would probably want an explanation about why I would want to watch documentaries that would be on the Discovery Channel in order to have something to be mean-spirited about. The documentaries could be about a million and one things, yet this damnfool thought that whatever on God's green earth the couple of documentaries were that I watched, it's proof positive that I don't know what the hell to do. I thought that he was going to make an assumption about it and that whatever it is, if it were actually true that it will reflect very poorly on me and that he'd tell it to his girlfriend with the logic that he knows her well enough to know that she will agree with him and I knew that she would think it stupid and then tell me that he said it. I don't think he made an assumption. I think he had the brains to know there's too little information to form a definite opinion since he didn't know what any of the documentaries were about, so he made one up and deluded himself that it was real. He recited the label and then called me a "sick dude." Then again, maybe his take could be that if anyone wants to watch these documentaries this can ONLY mean that they are sick. If so, the reason he did is because one of the top things that stupid people assume about others is that they are sick in the head. If you're a shithead it's your job to go assuming that people are sick in the head. Like tell every psychiatrist that you are aware that some individual has a video tape labeled "Discovery Channel documentaries," they'll go, "Yup, he's a sickie." Stupid people also make up lies about other people being sick in the head and they always make up the lies based on narrow-minded concepts. Also, I am pretty sure that I was able to ascertain that stupid people declared their guesses that they took about people being sick in the head that were based on narrow-minded premises and minor little things, but they declared the guesses as facts whilst speaking confidentially and authoritatively. If I am wrong, then the stupid people were assuming and not guessing--which means that they believed the retarded notions to be true.

 

            ______________________________________________________

 

                                    A STOPPED CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE A DAY

 

 

Two people I knew named Captain Crunch and Princess Leia got engaged. Immediately after they got engaged, Captain Crunch got the idea to leave Princess Leia for someone else and so he called off the engagement and they stopped seeing each other for a few months. Immediately after they got back together, Captain Crunch automatically assumed that Princess Leia must have gotten the idea in her head to cheat on him simply because once he came a tiny drop close to cheating on her. After he broke off the engagement, things were never the same with them. They couldn't get along at all. Therefore they kept on breaking up. The second time they broke up, Princess Leia started seeing another man. One of the times Captain Crunch and Princess Leia got back together, since they couldn't get along even for one day, Princess Leia started seeing the man she was dating the second time they broke up (the only man who at that time she had gone out with after Captain Crunch, by the by) and the shithead actually Forest Gump'd his way into knowing that (1) she was back with him and so that means that (2) she's sleeping over his house right at the very moment I was talking to him on the phone. He incorrectly thought he had two things as clues which he used to correctly guess that Princess Leia was seeing someone else at the same time she was with him. If they had gotten along wonderfully, Princess Leia would not have gone back to her old boyfriend. If he was never nasty to her, they would have gotten along much much better and they wouldn't have broken up. Clue #1, Captain Crunch thought that she was cheating on him because he wanted to cheat on her, but it was because he was nasty to her. Because Princess Leia's mother was a multi-millionaire and because Princess Leia grew up in a ten-room apartment on Madison Avenue, Captain Crunch assumed that she would only take a big shot as a boyfriend and that she is greedy. He didn't know that if she was like that, she would have had a husband or a boyfriend who is affluent and she would not have been engaged to him in the first place (in the time he knew her, he had nothing but crappy little jobs). He kept explaining to her that she was cheating on him with a big shot. He batted off a bunch of really really really high fallutin' job titles a possible boyfriend might have (such as investment banker). Clue #2 was--and I can only paraphrase what she told me that she said to him as a response--but it was something like, "Why does he have to be a hedge funds manager or movie producer, why can't he be a professor or an electrical engineer, or a musician or a pharmacist or a wine steward?" After that conversation, Captain Crunch explained to me that he figured out that Princess Leia is back with So-and-so because he owns a dot.com music business and that she talked about her dating a musician and that this was some kind of Freudian slip or something. Captain Crunch didn't understand the concept of people not having a job that sucks huge giraffe penis or not having big hotshot jobs, so Princess Leia was trying to teach him that there are other kinds of jobs in the world and that she's not so materialistic, money hungry and spoiled rotten. Once Captain Crunch was talking to me about everyone's money situations and he would only use the two words "rich" and "poor" and I was able to tell that that is all he was thinking about. (This reminds me of something else. Stupid people do know things; such as there is a middleclass and maybe about half of all stupid people know that people can be lower middleclass and upper middleclass, some stupid people (the one's who aren't super honest that is) know that someone can commit a crime for profit once in their lives and not be a career criminal, but it is not in their thought process to think like this. I explained to an uncle of mine once who was one of the biggest buffoons I've ever known that people can commit crimes once in a while and get away with it because I knew that it goes without saying that he didn't know that people can cheat on their taxes, buy a stolen stereo, steal cable television with an illegal cable box and not get arrested since he was straight-laced and a Mr. Perfect and a little goody-two-shoes and had the mind of a seven-year-old on a good day, so he asked me if I wanted to be a racketeer. He thought that I was talking about myself committing crimes and big ones and as a lifestyle. Even though he didn't tell me that it was his opinion that no one can profit financially by committing a crime, I know for a fact that this is what he thought because this concept would be too foreign to him and some people who aren't narrow-minded think that it's impossible to benefit either financially in a largish way or in some other major way by committing crimes and/or by doing legal things that are amoral and devious and so of course a grade A shithead who is a Mr. Perfect and a goody-goody must and because stupid people think that everyone is stupid and so it's a given that he assumed that no one is smart enough to commit a crime and not get arrested. That is to say, in order for Captain Crunch to be thinking about how people are middleclass, lower middleclass, upper middleclass and upper upper middleclass and to make sense of any of it, he would have to be listening to someone who's talking about it.) When Princess Leia told her mother that that new boyfriend of hers is smart, in a weary and slightly pissed voice, her mother replied, "After what you've had, smart is really all that matters." Her mother made many comments about how she thinks Captain Crunch to be a dumb guy. E.g., "Captain Crunch is not quite as smart as his mother would have us believe!" "He's a schmuck!" Princess Leia told me that her mother said that she wouldn't use her connections to get him a job because she'd be too embarrassed because "she thinks he's as dumb as a stump." I thought about that later on and thus at first I took that to mean she thought he'd be an incompetent worker, but then I figured out that she knew that the people she knows would realize that he's not bright from the things that he would have said. Once when me and Princess Leia were talking on the phone, she was asking her mother if a bunch of people they know are smart; her mother kept replying with "yes," to each, so I said into the mouthpiece, "Is Captain Crunch smart?," so Princess Leia asked her mother and she said, "No!" with a declarative, authoritative, indignant, angry tone of voice.

 

It went something like, "Is Jeffrey smart?" "Yes." Is Mary smart?" "Yes." "Is Frank smart?" "Yes." "Is Helen smart? "Yes." "Is Captain Crunch smart?" "No!"

 

Once in February 1988 at a job that I had, there was a poor and underprivileged Department Manager named Kevin (not counting the retarded, his intellect was _the_ worst I've ever come across [Oh my god!!!], or the worst intellect I've come across was this halfbreed Puerto Rican at a different job that I had) who unrelentingly made believe that he was a wealthy and successful businessman and so he got offended wondering that maybe the reason I had left early in the day was because I was lying about how something came up on account of how our job sucked dog johnsons, and yet this was in fact the very reason I made this choice. I left in order to not tear my hair out from unrelenting, intolerable boredom and in order to not bust my candy-ass doing physical labor and in order to have good fun and in order to not partake in things that I don't care about and in order to be somewhere that I would literally kill to get to be at (i.e., at home) and in order to rest in bed. I lied and told a manager that I wasn't feeling well and that I had to go home now, so he told me to tell Kevin. I went up to Kevin and said something to the effect of, "Adam told me to tell you that I'm going home now." I had guessed that Kevin would ask me why I wanted to leave to have me answer to him in order to cop a power-trip and also to delude himself that he has this authority (only a manager on up could grant permission to anyone to leave) because he is _the executive type_. He asked "why" in a tone of voice and with an expression that meant that (1) he was offended and that his ego was a drop bruised and that he was trying to determine whether it should be and to what degree, AND also just like (2) he was deciding whether or not I can go.

 

In May 1988, Kevin made up lies about me on my review to try to get even with me for coming from a well-to-do family and for taking advantage that I got it like this. One of the lies was that I can't be taught that if it's time for me to go on my lunch break and if the person in my department who went to lunch before me hasn't come back yet, that I'm to wait for him or her to get back before I go for lunch. The reason he decided upon making up this particular lie is because stupid people think that everyone alive is as stupid as retards and so this is a very very very very very very very realistic way of lying about someone being unable to learn something. Therefore, he figured that whoever the manager(s) are that read that on my review will turn out to be, it's a hundred percent that they're going to believe him; and without thinking that there's anything at all unusual about someone not being able to be taught something that the only criteria to be taught it is that you understand practical/conversational English and/or that you not have a short term memory worse than that of an Alzheimer's patient. It just so happens that one of the managers who read my review was this airhead who--not counting shitheads whom I've known for years and years--had conveyed to me that her intellect had failed her big time on more occasions and in more major ways than mostly anyone else I've met in my whole entire life (her intellect failed her in the exact same ways that stupid people's intellects fail them). I only knew her five months at a three-day-a-week job that I had where I took about two week's worth of personal days off (from December 1987 to May 1988) and in all the decades that have passed since I knew her, I haven't met too many people who have her approximate intellect. (Technically, I knew her longer than that because I hunted her down at a future job that she had and she displayed to me in two ways that her intellect had failed her in classic ways that shitheads' intellects fail them. That's because it's not likely that you will interact with the dumbest of the dumb and not notice that they don't know how to use their heads.) For reading me what Kevin wrote and then rephrasing it for me in her own words, chickenhead indignantly asked me if I understood that I have to wait for whoever went to lunch before me to come back to work, while phrasing it differently than she did the first time. I shook my head "yes," so then she indignantly asked me a second time if I understood it and then in indignation and with her intelligence insulted, she added, "or are you just saying that?" This is not the only instance I know of a shithead concluding that someone is too stupid to understand a concept that's as easy as ABC that they've heard someone else explain and then for the shithead to feel the need to explain it to the person and then for the shithead to not realize that it's crystal clear to the person.

 

She probably thought that I was told this on a number of occasions. That being a "toughie" is the exact same thing as not being able to understand any of the people who say to you, "Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky," "Abraham Lincoln is originally from Kentucky," "Abraham Lincoln's birthplace is Kentucky," "Abraham Lincoln's place of birth is Kentucky," "The state that Abraham Lincoln was born in is Kentucky," "Abraham Lincoln is from Kentucky originally," "President Abraham Lincoln was born in the state of Kentucky."

 

I asked my girlfriend who used to work with retarded people as a certified occupational therapy assistant whether a retarded person would understand someone who told them that they have to wait for the person who went to lunch before them to come back before they go to lunch and she told me that they would.

 

Now back to Captain Crunch who is maybe the most ludicrous figure I've ever known. In 1992, I turn to make a phone call in a payphone. I put his bag down all the while knowing that since we're on a public street--especially in a city--that there is some kind of remote chance that someone might want to steal the bag. I also knew that Captain Crunch would be thinking that the odds are great that someone will be scheming on the bag and that I need him to tell me that if I put a bag down right next to me that someone might come and take it. Then, seconds later Captain Crunch tells me that someone is scheming on the bag and that I've got to be careful because "this is Brooklyn." I look to see whom he's talking about and I see a Hispanic male in his twenties staring down at the bag from like eight feet away with a guilty look on his face and a look in his eyes like some serious thought is stirring inside his head. When Captain Crunch saw me about to use the payphone with my back to his bag, he looked to see whoever it was that will be aiming to take the bag. When he saw the would-be thief, he wasn't like "AHA! I KNEW IT!" He wasn't any more surprised than someone is to see rain who is indoors and hears rain and wants to know how hard it's raining and so he looks outside a window and does see rain. This is because Captain Crunch is a thief and even if he wasn't, he's still a very bad man and a criminal in other ways. It being a Hispanic and low-income neighborhood and maybe even a black ghetto was also gray. Stupid people think that everyone else is stupid too and so he didn't know that maybe I was guarding the bag and that I was about to turn around to check on it and that no one but the Flash could have been quick enough to steal it out from under me. It just so happens that the would-be thief was the closest person to the bag. Also, the guy in all likelihood wouldn't have made for the bag after accessing the situation and concluding that I must be its owner. He was probably hoping that the owner was much further away from the bag.

____________________________________________

 

STUPID PEOPLE THINK THAT ADULTS ARE ACTING OUT OF THE ORDINARY WHEN THEY'RE ACTING LIKE ADULTS. AND STUPID PEOPLE THINK THAT ADULTS CAN'T ACT LIKE ADULTS

 

Stupid people judge adults in the same manner that you judge young children. This is because stupid people have the minds of children and so they don't know what it's like to be an adult. And stupid people think that adults who do things that adults do are being peculiar. A shithead thought that I was "a sick dude" for having a VHS tape that I labeled "Discovery Channel documentaries." Once when we went to Bed, Bath & Beyond, I mentioned to him that I wanted a new dinner set. I guessed he might therefore think I was gay or meterosexual or something, then his girlfriend told me over the phone that he was wondering whether or not I was gay because I wanted a new dinner set, yet we had known each other about a decade at the time. He pondered that I was gay because I cook. If a nine-year-old boy loves cooking, maybe that's a little clue that he could be gay possibly, but a grown-ass man who cooks is not acting out of the norm at all. After he broke up with his girlfriend we discussed the concept of his girlfriend going out with another man. We were talking about her dating a guy who really exists or some fictitious guy for the purpose of talking about the prospect of her dating someone, I forgot which. I talked about a platonic friend of hers who likes her talking to her about a guy who if my memory serves me, she was dating and about her platonic friend offering her advice about dating the guy. Just like I guessed, the shithead assumed that her platonic friend wouldn't encourage her to date the guy and that he'd try to talk her into breaking up with him. The shithead explained that to me authoritatively and in anger and that he wants to "fuck her." For me not thinking what he thought, he wrapped up his lecture to me with: "What the hell's the matter with you?!" It's a shade of gray that the guy likes her and still will want her to date another man and is trying to help her out with dating him. Years after she met her platonic friend, he got married and had a kid. The shithead thought that her platonic friend is stupid because everyone is, so he never figured out in the approximate dozen years since he met her at the time we had that conversation that she just wants to be friends. It's also a shade of gray to the shithead that her platonic friend isn't a bad person like the shithead is because stupid people think that everyone in the world is exactly like them and so her platonic friend would surely go trying to sabotage her relationship. Plus, he'd cheat on his wife. The shithead never met her platonic friend. This is also a case of shitheads thinking that everyone who belongs to another group would all do the same things in hypothetical scenarios. I.e., her platonic friend belongs in a category of _men who like a girl who doesn't feel the same about them_. Also, it was in the early 1990s that the guy liked her--the shithead thinks he will always like her as much as he used to because if he likes her less or stops liking her (both of these things happen very frequently), that would be a shade of gray. Like all of the people you've ever wanted, you still do and just as badly as you ever did. Yet another reason the shithead thought that the guy who liked Princess Leia would try to talk her out of staying with her new beau is because the shithead thinks that everyone is real stupid and so the guy who likes her is too stupid to be a mature enough grown-ass man to handle the fact that a girl that he likes is with someone else. The reason he declared that her platonic friend "wants to fuck her" is because stupid people think that everything is extreme. I remember what happened now. We were discussing a hypothetical guy that she might have been dating and how her platonic friend would behave when he was talking to her about him and I mentioned how he would give her advice on how to solve some problem she was having with him or that she might eventually have (I can't remember because this was in 2005), but that I had inside information that she was actually dating a real guy who does exist. And I remember that the guy she was dating is Korean. Her platonic friend who likes her is also Korean, so I remember that I was thinking that if I had told the shithead that she is dating a Korean guy that this would confuse the shithead because the shithead would find this a gray issue. Coincidences and similarities will often confuse a shithead. He would make at least one assumption. Her platonic Korean friend would either be thinking that he's glad that some other Korean guy got her as opposed to some guy who's another race, or he'd be like damn! that Korean guy got her but this Korean guy can't! And the shithead could think that she has a fetish for Asian guys. Once in 1998, when I was talking to them over the telephone, the shithead made some comment about how she loves black men. Then, she said, "Captain Crunch thinks that I have a fetish for black men." I immediately was able to tell from the sound of her voice that she doesn't and that he was being preposterous again. What made him assume that is that once she said that some black rapper is handsome. When her Korean friend found out that she was dating the new guy, he said something to the effect of, "Thank God you're not with the scumbag anymore." This same shithead was telling me over the telephone once that some particular woman repeatedly has sex with her boyfriend and he was speaking in a disapproving tone of voice that meant that she was doing something that is out of the norm and that her morals aren't up to snuff and that if everybody else was aware of the fact that she has sex with her boyfriend that they would deem it _scandalous_ and so their mouths would drop and they would cover their mouths with their hands and they wouldn't approve either. Then in a loud indignant and authoritative voice I said, "Adults have sex!" Very shortly afterwards, he went to a couples' therapist with his girlfriend Princess Leia and then on some other day, she imitated for me over the telephone him finking on her to the couples' therapist that she had sex with the guy who became her new boyfriend after one of the times that she and the shithead had broken up. His girlfriend spoke in a voice that meant that he assumed that this will come as news to the couples' therapist and she will disapprove and be on his side and maybe turn her face to Princess Leia and then undermine her or ask her why. His girlfriend then told me that the couples' therapist said to him, "Adults have sex!" whilst imitating the authoritativeness, anger and short-temperedness in her voice. Not too long after that, the shithead explained to Princess Leia that when they were broken up he would sometimes drive past her apartment in his cab and that if the lights were on in her living room, then he would know that she was home by herself and that she wasn't having sex and "was being a good girl." Let me just interrupt myself for a second to say that this is a glaring example of what I mean by the more retarded an opinion a shithead has, the harder it is for someone to get it out of his head. This is also a glaring example of a shithead not noticing he's been told the same thing by more than one person. This is also a glaring example of a shithead not knowing what information to deem relevant; seeing how one of the people who told him that adults have sex is a couples' therapist and a board-certified psychiatrist. Also, shitheads think that certain people are of a higher personhood than others, so males can have as much sex as they want and still remain moral (that is, unless he thinks it occurs to men how they are corrupting their partners' morals and/or contributing to their delinquency). The shithead boasted to his couples' therapist that in all the years that he was with his other girlfriend during the various times he and Princess Leia had split up that he never had intercourse with her. His logic was that the couples' therapist would commend him and be of the opinion that he respects her and that he ALSO respects her gender (meaning that it's A-okay for two gay males to have anal intercourse). His girlfriend imitated their couples' therapist responding in an angry/ticked off/indignant/disapproving/blameful/short-tempered tone of voice (which meant that the couples' therapist thought that he was being stupid) by saying something along the lines of, "What was wrong? What was the problem?" (Those might have been her exact words.) Then Princess Leia said the shithead therefore looked confused. His couples' therapist is a female, so he was thinking that she is more than happy to consider herself less of a person for that and so she would think that he was commendably respecting his other girlfriend's femaleness and inferior adulthood and inferior personhood and he was expecting a big thumbs up from her. (To be thorough, I should point out that his other girlfriend was a man in drag and on female hormone pills [we didn't know this at the time] and that the shithead did have anal sex with the tranny (sp.?), so if _he_ was a _she_, they might have had intercourse. He never kissed him though. For argument sake, say that the tranny-hooker was a real female. Captain Crunch might think that he's not tarnishing her by him having sex with her--just no other man can have sex with her without tarnishing her. If so, this is because stupid people think that rules apply to everyone but them. Since gay men who are NOT stupid try deluding themselves that they are heterosexual via getting romantically involved with members of the opposite sex, of course a gay shithead would since each and every shitheads' whole method of operating is to delude themselves about things and to ignore things they don't like with the logic that it will go away.) When he was well into his thirties, his girlfriend told me that at a wedding, he stood up at a table and screamed at his mother and called her names like "slut" because he wanted his stepfather to hear what he was calling her. I asked his girlfriend if he doesn't like his stepfather and if he was trying to humiliate him by having him sit there with everybody watching while his woman was being insulted in public. She told me "no" and that what he was doing was he was thinking that he was apprising his stepfather that not in the entire time (years) that she was single due to having gotten divorced had she refrained from sex). This maybe is also a case of shitheads thinking that adults don't think like adults because a boy sometimes expects the woman he will eventually marry to be a virgin (but with the logic he will marry young, so that's not an entirely unlikely scenario) and so maybe his (at the time) fiftysomething stepfather wants to be the only one to have had his wife and definitely because the shithead thinks that his stepfather has found that the majority of unmarried female adults aren't sexually active by choice and his stepfather doesn't think that his mother is adult enough to have premarital sex and that only males are, or he figured this out because of how it just goes without saying. That is to say, everybody supposedly knows a fair share of women merrily abstain from having sex in order to not make themselves bad people. Captain Crunch is not a female, so this is also a glaring example of how someone stupid thinks he/she knows how the brains of members of a different group rationalize. (But let's say he was a female, then he'd think that males are practically another species and that he can tell you ALL about them. If he were a she, he'd deem himself an expert on the male brain. To state the obvious--if he was a female, he would not think that all females are alike.) This is also a glaring example of the stupid having their own made-up wisdom which they think is _conventional wisdom_. Once the shithead explained to me that women are amoral if they have sex and that they should respect their bodies. This is also a glaring example of one of the many sandillions of stupid ways that a shithead can falsely arrive at the conclusion that people are amoral. For every grain of sand on the beach, there are a million ways a stupid person can arrive at the conclusion that you are not as moral as you are. When this stupid goat-fucking moron was twelve or eleven or a little older, he had seen his divorced middle-aged mother having sex in their living room and so he deemed her a "slut" and this is what started him thinking that any woman is a slut if she has premarital sex even but one time in her entire life. His girlfriend, on the subject of him thinking about females having sex, had said to me, "It's a major pet-peeve." His opinion about any female whether she be an adult or a minor having sex hasn't changed in all these decades since he was a child because stupid people stay unbelievably wet behind the ears their whole lives. Since he had told Princess Leia that she was "used goods" or something to that effect (I'm almost certain that it was indeed used goods) for her having told him that she had sex with one other guy in one of the times that she and the shithead had broken up, that could mean that he thinks that his stepfather considers his mother "used goods." Most older adult males who get a woman in her late thirties on up who is a virgin would find this _disturbing_ because they would know that she is _troubled_. He also thought that his mother has had a lot of sex partners because he saw her having sex with a man. One of the most bizarre examples of a shithead thinking that if something happens once then it happens all of the time is a case of Captain Crunch thinking that his girlfriend's sister has sex all of the time and has/had multiple sex partners on account of her having lost her virginity to her boyfriend. Like NO female can theoretically lose their virginity without having intercourse with a boatload of guys all in the very same second. Years ago (in 1998), the shithead complained to me that she has sex with a lot of guys. I told his girlfriend that he said that. She clarified that her sister had the door to her bedroom open when she lost her virginity (she was an adult of eighteen at the time) and so the shithead saw it. At the time that he had complained to me about her supposedly having sex with a lot of guys, the only other guy she had sex with was her new boyfriend. The shithead understood the concept of her having lost her virginity, but then again, he didn't. The shithead complained to his girlfriend's mother about what he saw with the logic that his girlfriend's mother is perfectly willing to think that females like herself are inferior beings and so she'll go thinking that her daughter was misbehaving and tainting her house, but that the boyfriend was not a drop even, and that if it was her stepson who was the one having sex, that's fine and dandy. Also, the shithead thought that his girlfriend's sister wasn't the king of herself and that he'd be getting her in trouble with her mother on account of it being a behavior pattern of shitheads to act upon how they think that because young adults are still youths, that their parents are still authority figures to them even though the law states that if you turn eighteen that you can do whatever the hell you want. This is because--to a shithead--a youth is a youth. You can be of legal age or you can be a toddler, until you're an older adult, your parents can still punish you and forbid you from doing things. To put it differently, it's a shade of gray that an adult in his/her late teens or early twenties is a youth with no authority figure and shitheads don't do well with shades of gray. That night, the shithead threw an egg at her from a ten-story window for her having sex in her own house. He also told her that night that he'd kick her teeth out if he catches her in a night club. This is because stupid people think that they are parental authority figures to people. Some years later, she complained to me that one of the times that night that he was screaming his head off at her that he was helping himself to Chinese food.)

 

____________________________________________

 

Stupid people behave radically different when they're jealous. They feel a higher degree of jealousy than your average person does and they are jealous over things that there's nothing much to be jealous for.

 

Stupid people sometimes think that there's only one very very very very very very very specific way to get something done and that they know exactly what it is. If they know that someone else's way to get something done will work too or if they suspect that it might work and if the stupid people are arrogant, they make believe that their way is the only conceivable way to get the thing done and the other person's way will end literally in his or her destruction.

 

The world's biggest fools are at the peak of their intelligence when they're teenagers. In other words, shitheads are the least buffoonish when they are young.

 

One of the main things that stupid people think they know about other people is who other people interact with and who they don't and who they would and wouldn't interact with in hypothetical situations and how precisely they would interact if they find themselves in various hypothetical situations with certain kinds of people or with specific individuals. That is, stupid people think that they know who certain people would not shoot the breeze with (spend even but a few seconds talking to, especially in non-work-related situations), who they would and would not pal around with, who they would not go out on dates with and marry and why.

 

If a stupid person tells you some basic fact of life to try to be pompous and a show off and/or because he's angry at you and wants to make out like you have the mind of a four-year-old, and if he knows for certain that it goes without saying that you must have the brains to know what he's telling you or if he is so wet behind the ears that he only merely just suspects that you might know it, he'll tell you anyway because he thinks that this is a realistic way of treating people like they're stupid. Also, stupid people make believe that people they are interacting with aren't smart enough to figure out how to do something that just takes a lick of sense and how to be taught something that's as easy as blinking. (I've noticed this mostly about Average and Below Average Joes at their place of employment who delude themselves they're high-level executives and are on major power-trips. And that's not to say that I haven't noticed this with a fair amount of stupid people in other situations. What I mean is that the worst stalkos/power-trip people at their jobs do these things without letup.) That's because they think that anyone whose intellect isn't up to snuff is a mental retard and so they are doing a realistic job of treating them like their intellect is failing them.

 

 

Stupid people ALL think that if there's anything at all wrong with something that you want to do, that it's a _non-starter_ or a _showstopper_ or a _deal breaker._ I.e., a stupid person thinks that if there's one tiny little thing about a decision to do that's not ideal, then it's so not ideal that it sucks enormous donkey cock and therefore the thing should be abandoned posthaste and that if you already started doing it, you should drop it like a hot potato and do something else instead. And it doesn't have to be a thing, it could be a person you're friends with or a sex partner etc. And, regarding other people in hypothetical situations, stupid people also think that everyone else is going to agree with them about how a particular person, place or thing in a hypothetical situation is bad and so bad it's to be avoided at all cost. That is to say, if a stupid person is talking about everyone in the world being presented with a hypothetical choice to make, and if the stupid person thinks that there's something not ideal about it, then it's a hundred percent that he will also think that everyone in the world will likewise agree with him that it's an issue and so there's no one who wouldn't make the decision to not get involved in it; because you can't just not dislike something a little bit--it has to be anathema to you, and your _line of thought_ is the same as the stupid person's, because everyone's is. Stupid people don't know that even if you can't stand something(s) about a person, place or thing that you like, sometimes you'll just deal with it anyway and not call it off. As an aside, stupid people are usually wrong for thinking that the things that they believe to be bad are even the tiniest bit not up to snuff. The things that they think are bad are usually trivial and so trivial that most people would not even notice or if they did, they wouldn't mind a bit. And the things they think are bad are sometimes just misinterpretations of facts. For example, a shithead who thinks she's pegged the boyfriend of a female friend of hers as a "psychopath" will tell her friend many reasons why she should stop knowing him, and one of the reasons could be if she sees a razor blade of his that he's carrying on his person due to him having a job as a carpet installer because she'll think that he bought it to be used as a weapon.

 

Predicting what a stupid person is going to do, is sometimes as easy as predicting what a tiger would do if you pull on its tail. If you've known the stupid person for a while and thus you know what their likes and dislikes are, what their personality is, what they care about dearly, what stupid opinions they have, what they're _line of thought_ is, then it's easy to predict what they will tell you regarding certain things. If they are an absolute total stranger, it still is easy to predict what they will do.

 

Stupid people live their whole lives without ever noticing that they do any assuming about people whatsoever, yet they are forever finding out that their assumptions about people were wrong. Any time they've noticed that they made an assumption, they think that that was a rare occurrence and they have no memory of any of the countless other times they've learned their assumptions were wrong. For example, if a stupid person assumes that because something is missing in his house that that can only mean that a workman had stolen it, then when the stupid person finds it in a spot where he forgot where it was and so then he remembers having put it there, he'll not make the connection that that's even at least the second time that he believed an idea he built up in his mind to be true was untrue. He'll think that's something isolated. And whenever he realizes that he has misassumed, he's never like, "Well what do you know about that! Well if that don't beat all! Well I'll be a monkey's uncle! Well I'm a slab-slided jellyfish! Well slug me down and call me names! Shiver me timbers! Suffering tadpoles' uncles! If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes I never would have believed it! Now I've seen everything!" The second that it occurs to him that he was wrong is also the same second that he stops thinking about the fact that he had become aware that he was wrong. Many is the time that a shithead even forgot his assumption by the time that he finds out what really happened. This is usually because shitheads don't always have the wisdom to know what information to deem noteworthy. Also, the very same second the shithead realizes that he made a stupid assumption, he gets insecure about the fact that he was being stupid and that he's a fool, so that very same second he decides to forget that he had ever learned that his assumption is wrong.

 

Another way that stupid people never learn that they don't know people as well as they think is that they are constantly telling people lies and then they find out that the people don't believe their lies, yet they don't use this information to conclude that people are smarter than they think.

 

What I've noticed about lots of different people who are very very very stupid (and with a bunch of them, many times over) is that it seems to be more important to them that they win arguments where they either know for a fact that their opinion has been proven wrong or where they suspect that it might have been. It means the sun, the moon and the stars to them that they win arguments they get themselves into for being stupid. It is also this important to shitheads that they get the people they argue with to conclude that the shitheads won the arguments, and that any witnesses think they did and that everyone in the future who hears about the arguments concludes that the shitheads won the arguments. It is especially important to them that they win arguments about whether they are the ones with the intellectually correct opinion. They fight fiercely to win arguments and they take advantage of every opportunity to win an argument or a tiny little part of the argument. One reason for this behavior is because they want you to think that they have the intellectually correct opinion and that you are less intelligent than they are, whether it's true or not. They would love nothing better than to think they are smarties and for everyone to think they are smarties

 

There are at least three ways that a shithead will take advantage of every single opportunity that falls into his lap to win an argument. If in the course of you arguing with a shithead, you ask a shithead a question, if the shithead thinks that his answer can be the cause of him either winning the whole entire argument or just part of it, he will answer your question by saying whatever it is that he believes he has to say. It won't matter to him if it's a lie. If you are on the phone at the time with the shithead, he'll use an authoritative tone--with his school of thought being that if he doesn't use an authoritative tone, then maybe you won't believe him. If you're talking to the shithead in person, he'll use an authoritative tone combined with an authoritative expression to try to be extra convincing.

 

Since the shithead is smack dab in the course of arguing with you to prove to himself and to you that he is your intellectual superior by light-years, when he answers your question, he might antagonize you with his tone of voice and facial expression in order to give you grief and to lash out at you for daring to question his intellect and for causing him to feel at a huge loss of control by you hitting him with facts.

 

Another way he will take advantage of an opportunity to win an argument would be if you were to say something that on the surface can sound stupid, but isn't, he will make believe that what you are saying is as stupid as it can possibly sound.

 

A third way that he will take advantage of an opportunity to win an argument is if you purposely state something that will bolster his argument in order to see if he will reaffirm it, this is what he is going to do just as sure as the sun is going to cross the sky tomorrow. If it's over the phone, he will use an authoritative tone. In person he will use an authoritative tone along with an authoritative expression.

 

Another thing that stupid people do when they're arguing with you about things that you experienced in your life when they weren't there with you to witness for themselves is that they'll repeatedly take guesses about what really kept happening (including telling you very intricate details) and they hope to God that they're guessing correctly and plus they also wish with all their heart that they are too. Sometimes they won't present what they're telling you as "a guess." They will explain it as a fact in order to try to make you believe it beyond any doubt, but they'll know that they're only guessing. They also take guesses that they know are highly unlikely to be true. Sometimes they only know deep down inside that they're guessing because they delude themselves that their guesses are pure facts. The things that they take guesses at are as impossible to figure out as if I were to tell you that I saw two people get into a fistfight in a park and if you were to right now at this very precise moment tell me three definite/irrefutable reasons why or at the least, a very likely reason why, but yet they expect you to believe that it's the easiest thing in the world for them to discern. It's so easy that it only takes them one second to discern it and there's no two ways about it.

 

Sometimes, they even think that they can get you to believe that there is no possible way that the guess they are taking can't not be true, when there could be a million different explanations for why something happened.

 

If they think that you have a low IQ, their guesses will be about you having as much of a learning disability as a retard and the critical thinking skills of a retard and about how your brain is as unfilled as an infant's, a toddler's or a four-year-old's or about how you behave babyishly (like you play with Barbie dolls or that you are fantasizing that you're a superhero or a cowboy or an astronaut or that you sleep with a teddy bear and that you have a nightlight and that you are afraid to go to sleep at night without the nightlight on), and sometimes they will take these guesses if they think that you are just as smart as the next guy or if they think that you have a really high IQ. If they think you are stupid then they will take significantly more guesses about you being a retard by continually guessing about you not being able to be taught how to do things that only SOME retards can't be taught how to do and how your brain doesn't realize things that only retards would fail to realize and how you are like a tot because you're a clean slate and how you care about immature things and how you act like a tot. And the reason why even if they think that you are smarter than most, they will take guesses about you being like a retard and a preschooler up to a ninth grader is because stupid people don't have a general idea of what human intelligence is like. If you start to try to tell a shithead that you bore witness to a homicide and then if you start to tell him about what happened first, the shithead will think that he can argue with you about that and then the rest of what happened. Whenever you tell him he's wrong about what you saw with your own two eyes, he will keep on taking guesses about what supposedly really did happen. If you tell him five times that a particular guess of his is wrong, each of the five times he will argue with you about it because he won't be able to fathom how getting you to believe anything at all it may be that he conjures up in the span of one second isn't as easy as falling off a log. He will think that the DA should put him and not you on the witness stand to give testimony and evidence. Try to tell a shithead about what a tiger did to a woman, he may believe you when you say that she died from a bite to the back of the head but he will think that you think that he can correct you about the part about the tiger attacking the woman because he will say that the woman attacked the tiger. This is because he is going to want you to think that he handed you your ass. That is what he is going to want.

 

One way a stupid person will spew stupidity is if he's opining about two particular people being friends.

 

What it's like being stupid is somebody that's a plain stiff and unskilled or low-skilled and is thinking his life would be in the best condition with a republican like Mitt Romney or George W. Bush as his president.

 

The most frequent assumptions that stupid people make are about other people being stupid, or at the very least that they might not be stupid but their intellects failed them somehow.

 

Stupid people have a bigger aversion to criticism than the average person does. They also take being ribbed in a playful way and in a harmless way and in a tiny way badly.

 

I already mentioned this, but it bears repeating since it's so universal regarding the stupid. Stupid people have a higher aversion to having their opinions and lies that they make up undermined than non-stupid people do and often to the point where they can't handle it. Like say that there are a hundred people whose intellects are up to snuff in a room. Fifty of them are average in intelligence, twenty of them are slightly above average in intelligence, twenty-five of them are way above average in intelligence and five of them are geniuses. And say that there are also a hundred shitheads in the room. The percentage of the shitheads who will mind terribly if someone displays to them that opinions or lies of theirs are intellectually incorrect will be way higher than the non-stupid people in the room. I know of absolutely no one in my fifty-plus years who wasn't a huge shithead who has displayed that he minds so badly someone letting it be known that they had a factually incorrect opinion or that they were being stupid for thinking that they had the right to do something that someone is conveying that they don't have the right to. And I know of a whole lot of shitheads who have behaved this way and a lot of the shitheads each had behaved this way on many many occasions. I know of no one but shitheads who kept on arguing with people after realizing in the argument that they had the intellectually incorrect opinion. If you take the next five hundred stupid people you pass by on the street and the next five hundred people you pass by on the street who aren't stupid, it just may be that every one of these five hundred stupid people will mind someone thinking that they have an intellectually incorrect opinion, that they're not ethical about something or that they are bad people and that they don't have a particular special privilege more than the people who aren't stupid would mind someone thinking these things.

 

Being a sore loser for losing an argument is something that is extremely prevalent among the stupid.

 

Not only are stupid people often too stupid to (1) recognize good life-strategies they hear people explain in detail and to (2) know that the life decisions people made are good ones, stupid people conclude that certain people are too stupid to plan a workable strategy to pull off doing something extremely simple that they will just spend a few seconds doing and only once in their lives. And the thing could be something that no one but the mentally retarded could ever be too stupid to figure out a way to do it. Stupid people also often think that even if someone were to tell them how to do a thing that is as easy as winking, that they will fail big time and they could be in a world of hurt and they are going to live to regret it.

 

One reason why someone stupid can't learn that something is true if he has a rooting interest in it not being true is because he will just immediately stop thinking about the fact that he had found out that the thing is untrue--with the logic that this will make it go away forever. In other words, if a shithead wants so badly for something that's as true as can be to be dead wrong, the exact second that he either learns that it's definitely untrue or that there is a possibility that it's untrue, he will strategically stop thinking about what he just found out is really the truth or what he just found out might really be the truth. This is because he thinks that if he's no longer thinking about it, that will be because it doesn't exist and so there's no reason to give it any thought at all. He doesn't know what's going on inside his own head and so he doesn't know that he's telling himself that he's making the decision to forget about it forever. And because he's a shithead, his memory sucks farts out of two million dead pigeons and so he has no memory of ever having learned what the truth is or what it might be. But even if you're not stupid, if you only have been aware of things for a split second up to about two-point-something seconds, you usually will not remember them.

 

Stupid people, for conversations, dominance displays, arguments and to be showoffs will often try magically setting themselves up as experts on things that they know nothing about and passing themselves off as experts on things they know nothing about. Another thing that they do is they try deluding first and foremost you and then secondly themselves that their way of getting something accomplished is the only way possible to get the thing accomplished when there could be endless ways of doing it.

 

Stupid people think that the way things used to be in olden times are still the way that they are today and will be until the end of time and should be.

 

Puerto Ricans are unintelligent people.

 

Stupid people not knowing that everyone in the world isn't exactly like them and that everyone in the world doesn't care about whatever it so happens to be that the stupid people care about is not just narrow-mindedness and naiveté on their part, it's also a case of them having a small and primitive brain. For example, because dogs have small and primitive brains, I've known two dogs who worried that people who were visiting their owners wanted to take over the beds that the dogs and their owners slept in together. The most over-the-top examples I can think of about how stupid people think that everyone cares about something that stupid people do are cases of stupid people thinking that no one they antagonize or try to bully will talk back to them on account of how the stupid people reason that everyone's priorities are that of the stupid people's and so since the stupid people don't want to get talked back to because that would make them become angry, offended, upset, that their intelligence would be insulted, they would be humiliated, they would be set straight, they would get shown up etc., that the people they're fucking with won't want the stupid people to endure it.

 

Stupid people conclude that they are parental authority figures to other people. Stupid people also conclude that certain people are parental authority figures to certain other people.

 

I know of not one individual who couldn't get good grades in high school to save their life. No high school kids are of such inferior intellects that they can't get good grades in high school if they apply themselves. I had a best friend who was mildly retarded or a notch or three away from being mildly retarded and he went to college for a year or so and he got good grades. I can't say that him getting good grades in high school had jack shit to do with the fact that stupid people can get good grades in school if they try hard because I met him in September 1978 at a private school we were in (he was a high school student, I was in grade an eighth grader) and they passed me in all of my classes from September 1978 to June 1980 that I should have failed, including gym and I never once showed up to even one gym class because they wanted the tuition money for me. A superintendent in a building that I used to live in was one of the top stupidest people I've ever known and before he was a superintendent he was an aerodynamic engineer, Captain Crunch went to Stuyvesant High School (you have to get straight A's to go there) and when he was a child, he scored 149 on an IQ test and he went to college for half a semester and got lots of A's and maybe even straight A's and my uncle was a scientist and an engineer and a mathematician and a schoolteacher and the airhead that I used to know at the job that I had from December 1987 to May 1988 has since gone to college and she became a biology teacher and now she is an assistant principal. Maybe if a high school student has a learning block, this could mean that in some classes, they might get bad grades, but I'm guessing that their brains are developed enough by the time they get to high school that the fact that they have a learning block doesn't make it so that they get such low grades that they fail their classes. Maybe in certain classes they might get a C if they have a learning block even if they try their hardest??????? I know of a little kid whom they say has a learning block and she has to be in a special class, but I am guessing that when she's in her mid-teens that she will be smart enough to be in a regular class because I am guessing that even if she is stupid, her brain will be more developed.

 

If you find yourself arguing with a shithead, he might tell you something that a three-year-old knows (for example, a red light means 'stop') or he might make believe that you do something childlike (you fantasize about something retarded) or that you devised some wet-behind-the-ears plan (for example, if you are hoping a girl that you want to ask out on a date will pan out to be your Mrs. Right, the shithead might ask you if you think that she's just going to marry you immediately after you start dating her since he'll think that you think that all you have to do is just land a date with her to make her your wife) because he is attempting to get you to conclude that you are like a little kid and thus his intellectual inferior by light years and so this means that whatever the argument is about, his opinion is the intellectually correct one. A shithead reasons that if he gets into an argument with a sixty-year-old man who has never before deemed himself stupid in his whole life, that simply upon the shithead treating him like he is no smarter than a child of two, that he will now be thinking that this is precisely to a T how smart he is. Also, he wants to treat you like you have the brain of a tot to be insulting because he's angry that you are questioning his intellect by claiming that he is wrong and that you think that you know better than him and shitheads have a higher aversion to having their intellects questioned than your average person does. All anyone has to do is let it be known that they think that a shithead thinks something that's intellectually incorrect, they will get so angry. Also, he repeatedly treats lots of people like fools in lots and lots of arguments so that all of those people conclude that they are finally made to realize that they've been all-around fools their whole lives but that they didn't see it until just then.

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

THE CONCEPTS OF PEOPLE AND JOBS & NON-PLATONIC AND PLATONIC CONCEPTS ABOUT PEOPLE AND CONCEPTS ABOUT PEOPLE AND MONEY AND MATERIAL OBJECTS

 

 

Two pretty guaranteed ways of getting a dimwit to start thinking a minimum of two or three stupid things and then acting on it is by telling him something about a job having to do with someone other than the shithead or about other people interacting with one another.

 

By two people interacting with one another, that could be cases of the dimwit's opinions on two people who are platonic friends. Or the concept of two people some day in the future becoming platonic friends with one another. Or the dimwit's opinion of what would happen if one guy tried to become buddies with some other guy or to merely just hang out with him some time. Or two people involved with one another in a non-platonic way. (This last one, though, is the most fail-safe way to cause a simp's brain to malfunction and thus to say at least one stupid thing with a thought-process behind it that is stupid on so many levels. This is almost a reflex action a la Pavlov's dog or a natural instinct a la a rooster not only knowing to crow, but at the crack of dawn. If you are referring to a non-platonic notion about yourself, then you are drastically increasing the odds of this happening because the shithead likely will feel you're in need of a lecture and if it entails you hooking up with someone in a non-platonic way, well then the shithead will conclude that you need him to save you from yourself and that you are on a collision course with catastrophe or that you won't land even one date because the person won't want you and the reasons why they won't or because the strategy you came up with to get the date is a bad one and if the shithead is arrogant and a meanie, he might want to purposely upset you and show off his intellect. He might even thus make something up that's stupid.)

 

For example, a married couple, two people who date each other, two people who have sex with each other.

 

Or tell a halfwit some opinion of yours which is a non-platonic notion such as something along the lines of how you think that someone was staring at you because they were physically attracted to you or that someone was flirting with you or that someone was hitting on you or that someone was trying to get you to hit on them or that someone was trying to obtain you in some other miscellaneous sort of way or that someone turned you down for a date or how you plan on finding a date, then sit back and see what comes out of his mouth next.

 

Or try this as an experiment: Tell a fool that you're going to ask someone out on a date. The person you want to date could be either someone the fool knows or it could be someone the fool has never set eyes on and who the fool doesn't know anything about, yet there's a very good chance he will manage to display with words that his intellect is not up to snuff. In all likelihood it will be by telling you something negative or something bad.

 

Or if he has met the person you are hoping to date or if the person is a stranger but he knows things about the stranger, the things that he knows about the person you want to date and the things that he knows about you will cause him to draw false conclusions. The conclusions could be things that even though there are seven billion people on the planet, that no one else would likewise think.

 

Or they could be obvious things that any shithead would assume true to form. The same goes if you were to tell him about someone you hope to make your significant other. Or tell him your reason(s) why you want to be with someone in a particular non-platonic way, he will--as if on cue--display that he is as narrow-minded as can be and wet behind the ears a la child of six or younger maybe.

 

Anything at all that I neglected to mention that has to do with two people in a non-platonic situation is something that will more than likely be the cause of any halfwit thinking a bare minimum of two stupid things, but usually it's dramatically more than this small a number. (If you therefore argue with him about an assumption he tells you that has to do with one of the above-mentioned things, then he will blitz you with retardation. The argument will last a long time, unless you don't have the desire to continue on.) [Him conveying in numerous ways that he is narrow-minded and wet behind the ears doesn't necessarily only have to do with the subject of the two people in a non-platonic way. For example, he could be blatantly trying to make a show of how brilliant he falsely thinks he is by telling you something that any child of six would know; all the while genuinely thinking it to be a golden nugget of wisdom and not knowing that you see what he's doing. Also, in this same conversation, he might betray that he doesn't know that you know things like that if you got caught robbing a bank, that you would go to jail.]

 

If he doesn't have an opinion, then he might instead manage to waste his time and waste his breath by making up a lie to tell you which will be so stupid that no one on earth would even remotely suspect is possibly true. It will also be obvious to everyone that the dimwit just concocted it in his peanut mind and the reasons why he felt the need to. Or if the dim bulb knows specific information about two people who are complete strangers interacting or about two people who barely know each other interacting, he will think stupidly and most of the time he will speak his mind.

 

The only way you might not necessarily wind up arguing with the shithead is if the shithead _isn't_ a meanie or disrespectful. The most stupidest acting AND thinking shitheads are the ones who ALSO have inferior morals and are stuck-up. Not once in my life have I argued with a shithead about the above header who wasn't arrogant. But if I did, the conversation would've ended as soon as I told him or her the real deal. At the most, the shithead would've just said one thing to argue with me, then I would've replied to that falsehood and then the shithead would've understood I was right and he or she would've accepted it. (I've also never met a shithead who was amoral, but not arrogant. I've also never met a shithead who wasn't amoral and so this paragraph is PURELY hypothetical. But since there are billions of people in the world, it must apply to some shitheads out there somewhere.)

 

Or if he knows information about two specific people who are neither platonic friends, non-platonic friends or two strangers interacting with one another or two strangers just being in the same location, he very well might have something stupid to say about this--especially if the subject is broached with words. For example, a shithead might think that the owner of a wealthy business will not yuck it up with a low-level employee or even acknowledge him with a 'hello'. The logic being is that he's not dignified and that the business owner is a big bossman to the low-level worker and that the low-level worker is too much of the business owner's working inferior and social inferior and this turns the business owner off. The business owner also is of the opinion that the low-level worker must be his intellectual inferior by far or he would have a halfway decent job and so the business owner has no interest in what the person has to say.

 

Or, say that there is a stupid person who knows that there is a poor black maid who comes from a poor family and works for a rich white family and that the stupid person has never met her. The stupid person might think that she is resentful of the white family she works for and that she doesn't care about them and that she's prejudiced about them and wishes bad things to happen to them. The only way a shithead would know that her being black doesn't definitely come into play would be if the shithead is black--unless of course the black shithead is a bad person. (If the shithead has met her he will still think the above because stupid people don't know what the people who have been in their lives for years and years are like.) These two examples I just gave are also examples of how jobs that people other than a shithead have AND how concepts of people other than the shithead and money AND people interacting will bring out the stupid in a shithead.

 

Usually anything that a shithead is aware of that entails these two things is like winding up a toy robot and watching it go if you mention it to him. A shithead is more likely to say stupid things when it comes to non-platonic notions about people being together than platonic notions about people being together. The things he thinks about non-platonic notions about people being together are usually stupider than the things he thinks about platonic notions about people being together. They are also greater in number. There are two reasons I can think of right off the bat why. Non-platonic notions are more serious than platonic notions and so the shithead is going to assume more serious assumptions. There is more gray with non-platonic notions than there is with platonic notions. For example, an average looking guy who doesn't make a lot of money and who goes out on dates with a very very pretty woman would confuse a shithead. A shithead would assume that an average looking guy who is rich and who goes out on dates with a very very pretty woman is only able to because she likes him for his money. A shithead will usually think that a guy shouldn't go out on a date with a woman that the shithead wouldn't want to get romantically involved with. The shithead's stupidity about something non-platonic doesn't have to do with two people interacting. It could have to do with an assumption of his about why a woman would turn some guy the shithead knows down for a date, or it could have to do with a shithead assuming that someone is sexually attracted to a lamp post.

 

Another way simps are always thinking and acting stupidly regarding non-platonic notions about people is by the simps assuming non-platonic things for absolutely no reason. For example, if a simp is setting eyes on some guy for the first time as he's driving his car out of a carwash, this somehow has to do with something(s) non-platonic. Like, the reason the stranger looks angry is because he thought that it was one of those bikini carwashes. From there, the shithead might assume that this was a double waste of time for the guy because the car was already clean when he went in there since ogling girls was all he wanted with the carwash. Shitheads think that they have the ability to deduce just like Sherlock Holmes.

 

Plus, the terminally stupid will think stupidly about groups of people or two different groups of people coming into contact. Lemme elaborate some more about shitheads and jobs.

 

Anything that has to do with the concept of a job might bring out the stupid in a shithead. If the concept has to do with someone other than the shithead, then the odds that the shithead will assume something that's stupid are yet even greater. The shithead might also think stupid things about his own job, not because the stupid things are his natural opinion, but because he deludes himself into thinking the stupid things.

 

For example, a shithead thinking he knows why someone wants to get a particular job. A shithead thinking he knows why someone has a job. A shithead thinking he knows why someone is out of work. A shithead thinking that someone's job speaks volumes about their personality and their IQ. A shithead thinking he knows how much money someone has and what their family background is based on what job they have. A shithead telling you what kind of job he thinks that you should work at for the rest of your life. If a stupid person hears that there's some guy named Joe who has a gynecologist practice somewhere, the stupid person might think that he uses it to fleece people and just based on the fact that he has a gynecologist practice. Or if the shithead finds out how much he charges and then compares his prices to a gynecologist in the Midwest and Joe the gynecologist has his practice on Park Avenue in Manhattan, the shithead could conclude that he overcharges certain patients he thinks are suckers and to the point where he charges his other patients hundreds of dollars less for the same services.

 

And the shithead could be jealous of someone who has a job that the shithead wants. If so, the shithead will sometimes feel the need to act on it. Plus, the shithead won't know that it will be apparent that he is jealous and acting on it. Another classic way that shitheads are jealous of people regarding jobs are cases of shitheads being jealous of other people who have the same jobs as the shitheads, but who work less hours than the shitheads and who have different jobs than the shitheads, but who work at the same company as the shitheads and who work fewer hours than the shitheads, and people who have the exact same job as the shitheads and get paid more money.

 

The amount of things about jobs that can cause a shithead to think and act stupidly is infinite.

 

Once, in 1992, I told an uncle of mine who had an atrociously low intellectual level when he was alive that I was going to answer personal ads from women in newspapers. This was over the telephone and I had already learned by osmosis that telling him some non-platonic thing is a good way to get not just him but any shithead worth his salt to betray that he is a shithead and so I sat there waiting for him to express that he thinks that my idea would not be good for me. I figured out what he would think. As if on cue, he told me "no-oooo" in a nervous, authoritative voice that meant that some disturbing thought(s) were occurring in his pea brain as he was speaking. There was also a trace of dread in his voice. Before that, I met one woman from a personal ad in a magazine, and then starting in 2003 I met a bunch of women from online personals and in 1998 (or 1997), one from a telephone personal ad and it all turned out fine.

 

Any woman whose personal ad I see is someone I don't know from a hole in the wall and so there's no way of verifying whether she would have turned out to be someone who would have been square enough, proper and refined enough and straight-laced enough that he would be able to relate to her and that he would have things in common with and not be disturbed by her behavior. I couldn't put my finger on what else was bothering him at the time. I figured it out some years later when I came across the word "misoneism" in the dictionary; which means a hatred, fear or intolerance of something new or changed. What it didn't mention in the dictionary is that a misoneist also thinks that the sheer newness of a new plan to try to accomplish a new idea makes it so that it is a poorly planned idea. For example, sometimes when people told him plans they devised to go into business for themselves, he had deemed the plans stupid and ineffectual. It also didn't mention that misoneism has to do with the misoneist pegging new things to do as "stupid." I have yet to meet any other square and I have yet to meet another misoneist and I have met ONLY one other Mr. Perfect and that was so long ago that Ronald Regan was president and I doubt I will meet another one. The other Mr. Perfect was less of a Mr. Perfect than the shithead. (And the other Mr. Perfect also thought that everyone in the world was exactly like him. He also thought that no one can benefit in a big way by doing something devious or dishonest--especially if it was illegal or about ten notches away from being a tiny drop complicated.)

 

Almost everyone in the history of Ever has really liked things that a square bases his life around. I must have met people who are a little square in a few ways, but not to such an extent that "square" could be a word to describe them. There are seven billion people on earth, so there has to be other squares out there, but not a one of them is nearly as square as the dimwit. The dimwit was a scientist, a school teacher and an engineer by trade. Also he was an expert mathematician, a bookworm, and he didn't know who Stephen King was. Nor had he ever heard of any of Stephen King's books even though a lot of them were made into movies. He didn't like hip music. He didn't do too many things that aren't a square thing to do. If he knew whoever the next person who's going to drive past my bedroom window will be, he would talk to him or her about science or astronomy. At Thanksgiving at his house from the 1960s to the time he got Alzheimer's when he was in his seventies in the late 1990s or maybe into the early twenty-first century and thus the moron was no longer able to host Thanksgivings, he'd take out his slide projector and show slides of his vacations in foreign countries. My father used to complain about the slides and he kept saying that he once heard someone moan due to the shithead announcing that he's going to show slides. In the year 2011, my father, all pissed off, indignant and fed up, said that in the 1950s which was before Thanksgiving was held at the shithead's house, when my father had just met the shithead and when my father was just starting to date my mother, that he went to the shithead's house and that the shithead took out a slide projector and showed them slides.

 

The following year after the World Trade Center incident, he sent me a subscription to a children's version of National Geographic magazine. The following year, he renewed the subscription. I don't remember whether I mentioned that at the idea of going to the World Trade Center, I ran out of my house screaming like my hair was on fire. And I cried like a baby. So this is a perfect example of how a shithead doesn't know what information to use to form conclusions. Also, when I was at his house for Thanksgiving some years earlier, I had a gas-powered airplane and he took me to a football field to fly it. Before that, his wife asked me what I want for my birthday and I pointed out this really big plastic wooly mammoth in a store window and the shithead and another uncle of mine put it together. This is another example of how a shithead doesn't know what information from the past to use to form conclusions. As a young child, I had the wisdom to figure out that one of the stupid reasons he thought that I would like this piece of garbage he called a present was because since I was a child and since the magazine was made for children, it must be something I would want. In other words, the magazine was put out for kids and I was a kid, so that has to mean that I'm going to like it. He wasn't a young kid, so this is a perfect example of how stupid people think that if someone belongs to a different group than them that they all like the same things. Due to him picking this garbage out as a birthday present for me, back then I had remembered the lyrics to this song on this kiddie show Wonderama "kids are people too," and that he was thinking that kids aren't real people like adults are, so all kids are exactly like one another.

 

Another stupid reason he put on his thinking cap and concluded I will sit there and not just read as much as one paragraph in any of these twenty-four magazines (pieces of shit) he had sent to my house, but I will patiently read one article right after the other each and every month for two years (I will read an article about a day in the life of an Eskimo girl, then turn the page and read whatever it happens to be that's on that page too. if it's about a baby giraffe, I'll read it. then I'll turn the page and sit there looking at a photograph of flamingos. then, the next month I will read an article about a Tibetan boy and four pages dedicated to rocks [I have a February/January 2004 issue and there are actually four pages dedicated to different kinds of rocks and minerals if you can believe it] -- I seem like the type) was because not only could he not do something that a square wouldn't do and therefore buy me a present that wasn't something academic, but he had rows and rows of National Geographic magazines on bookshelves that took up a whole wall in the guest bedroom of his house and stupid people think that everyone likes all of the things that they so happen to like. The word "square" and "narrow-minded" were not in my vocabulary back then, but I remember thinking that it's narrow-minded to think that everybody--not even excluding young children are square just because you are, but I just didn't think this thought in words. My father once said about the shithead, "He's a square. I've never met anyone squarer. And if I have, I can't remember when." If you can't relate to anyone you've ever spoken to and engage in a decent conversation with anyone for longer than a few minutes tops due to how no one you have ever come in contact with is like you, that is one reason to notice that no one is like you. And even if no one in the whole entire world being like you has anything to do with whether you can relate to them and whether or not you can interact with someone successfully, if you are such a rarity that you never have known anyone like you and if you are something to an extraordinarily extreme degree, you would notice you are unusual and one of a kind if you were just half stupid.

 

Here there were three things that even though the old fool had known me for twenty-seven years, he thought that I (and everyone) am which almost no one is: A square, a little Mr. Perfect (or a little Miss Perfect) and a misoneist. This is a retarded example of being _out of it_. And this man was in his seventies. (One other thing that he was that I cannot name anyone else I've ever met as being was old-fashioned. Therefore he had never noticed that people aren't old-fashioned anymore and so in October 1987 he told me an assumption about how in a hypothetical situation that everyone in the world would react due to everyone in the world being old-fashioned. Once, in 1994, I asked a cousin of mine her opinion of the shithead and she called him "old-fashioned," "small-minded," and "boring.")

 

Other reasons I or any other man shouldn't go out with a woman from the personals if you're asking him is because if she smoked marijuana or if she was rowdy or if she shoplifts or if she wears a bellybutton ring or if she has a tattoo or if she talked about a stolen bracelet she bought at a fence, then going out with her wouldn't be a perfect thing to do. And I should have started caring that my idea to obtain a date through the personals isn't an old idea.

 

Not counting umpteen different kinds of assumptions about other people and money, the two other most retarded assumptions I've ever heard were made from shitheads assuming things about other people when it comes to (1) jobs they have and the concept of them having jobs that they don't have or how the shithead assumes that they won't be able to get jobs that they want (or similar things like how the shithead assumes that people won't be able to start up a business of their own) and countless other things about other people and jobs (like what would happen if two strangers are sitting on a park bench carrying on a conversation and one of them is a highly skilled professional with a prestigious job and has made millions of dollars in the job world if he in the course of the conversation is to find out that the guy he's talking to is only a garage attendant) and (2) people who are already involved with one another in non-platonic ways and the concept of two people who aren't involved with each other in non-platonic ways becoming so (like what would happen between two people who go out on a blind date, or what would happen if some woman named Erica whom the shithead knows agrees to go out on a date with that guy sitting in the blue car across the street over there) or how the shithead assumes that someone is wrong for either knowing for a fact or for suspecting that some member of the opposite sex or the same likes them in a non-platonic way, or what would be the one singular thing that would happen and why it would happen if someone the shithead knows were to ask any member of the opposite sex in the world for a date, or what would happen if someone the shithead knows were to ask out someone else the shithead knows or what would happen if someone the shithead knows asks out someone who is a stranger to the shithead, but whom the shithead knows a little information about (i.e., the shithead knowing some of her stats, how attractive she is). Or the dumb-assery could be the shithead thinking that the plan you came up with to get a date won't work. In other words, the shithead could think that you could get a date, but you have to change your strategy. He will think he can think up a superior strategy and in no longer than two seconds tops. If the shithead is referring to you trying to get a date with someone who is not the shithead's gender, the odds are that he will say something(s) even stupider. This is because shitheads don't know that generally speaking that all people are the same and so it doesn't matter that someone looks different than you and that they belong to a different group than you. Also the stupidity that a shithead spews on the concepts of jobs regarding other people and on non-platonic concepts about other people and about other people and money are mostly all unflattering or pessimistic. So too are other kinds of assumptions of theirs that have to do with other people and NOT themselves.

 

Also, the stupidity that a shithead spews about conceptual thoughts regarding someone other than him and a job and about someone other than him in a non-platonic situation and about other people and money are oftentimes the shithead's made-up lies as he's winging it that he doesn't expect will set off people's BS detectors.

 

Due to the fact that the most frequent thing that stupid people assume is that other people are stupid, the stupid people combine all together assumptions about (1) people being stupid with assumptions about them and (2) jobs and them in (3) non-platonic scenarios. They also combine these assumptions with (4) assumptions about other people and money. They also might combine two to three different combinations of (1), (2), (3) and (4) in their assumptions.

 

Since stupid people also frequently assume that other people are morally inferior or at the least that they lack morals about something in particular, that other people are lily livered, that other people are whackos, that other people are weirdos and that other people have egos the size of the Empire State Building and that everyone in the history of humankind is exactly like them, they also combine their assumptions about these things into (1), (2), (3) and (4). They also combine other miscellaneous assumptions that stupid people collectively assume into (1), (2), (3) and (4). And if a stupid person is always assuming something that no other stupid people but him assumes, he'll combine that stupidity into the mix.

 

I've mentioned throughout this letter that one of the most frequent ways that stupid people's intellects fail them is when it comes to them thinking about other people and money, so I should give an example of a way this happens that doesn't have anything to do with them assuming or holding a false opinion. Not only do they get jealous of other people for their money and try to get even with them, they could act out of the ordinary for being jealous in other ways. A dead uncle of mine who was one of the top stupidest people I have ever known in all the many many many years I've been alive (I was born way back in 1965) was made the executor of his brother's will. He was so jealous of the two girls (his nieces) whom his brother left his money and house to that he wouldn't try to carry out the instructions in the will. Therefore, my father, who was not a blood relative of the two girls, had to take over as executor of the will. For years my father brought this up for discussion with me. Many years ago, one of the times my father brought up for discussion again that my uncle wouldn't help my cousins with their financial affairs because he was jealous of them for how much money they had, just to try to get my father to elaborate more and to give examples of this, I pretended that I didn't believe my father with a complete certainty. Thus, my father said to me, "You pick things up." The airhead was too stupid for it to occur to him that my father might be able to read him. My cousin had no idea that my father was made the executor of her father's will. She explained to me that she had to take over managing the money that her father had left her and her sister. She explained to me that even though she was a youth that she was able to tell that our uncle had no sense for money. The reason this shithead had no sense for money is because not counting people who only are a little smarter than mildly retarded on down to severely retarded, this man had less of an imagination than anyone you'll ever meet,

 

Also what I've noticed from me and a bunch of other people who've dealt with shitheads is that tons of conversations we've had with them have started with some combination of the above. From there it lead to another combination, then next it lead to another combination and so on and so on. A lot of the conversations I've had with them had gone on for about a half hour to an hour and maybe everything that came out of the shitheads' mouths were various combinations of the above. When this happens it's usually because someone is arguing with the shithead and so he's repeatedly spewing his thoughts and trying to best the person he's arguing with. A combination can start out with a shithead announcing something stupid about other people and money combined with someone who according to the shithead is weird. Then, when the person the shithead is talking to replies back to the stupid thing they've just heard, it will cause the shithead to lecture the person he's talking to about some non-platonic hypothetical notion and the thing that the shithead could be lecturing about can be something that a six-year-old would know, which will also betray that the shithead doesn't know people or he would know that the person he's speaking to already knows what the shithead is saying; which would be a case of the shithead combining a non-platonic notion about someone other than the shithead along with a notion about someone other than the shithead being stupid. Then the next thing out of the shithead's mouth could be an assumption about how no beautiful women ride the subways because they all have rich husbands; which would be a non-platonic assumption about people other than the shithead (due to people being married) and an assumption that also has to do with other people and money. This would also be an assumption about how a shithead thinks he knows how people's brains work and thus what they will do on account of him thinking that the last thing that anyone--especially someone who has a lot of money would want to do is to take a subway ride and how the shithead thinks that he can know that every beautiful woman who ever existed had their number one priority be to get rich. Then, ten seconds later, the next thing that comes out of the shithead's mouth could be about how he thinks someone is stupid for some particular reason or other which also has something to do with the concept of other people and jobs plus someone other than the shithead being lily livered. Then the next thing that comes out of his mouth could be a lie that a baby would know is a lie which would mean he's thinking that mankind is a stupid species since it's not possible for anyone to tell that he's lying, which would mean that the shithead is also betraying that he thinks people other than himself are stupid and the lie could be something about jobs that's stupid combined with two different things about how people other than the shithead feel about money that's stupid and that also has to do with someone other than the shithead being crazy. The next thing can be an assumption that if it just so happens that today is the last day that a doorman in apartment building is going to be working in the building because he's making today his last day, if you leave your purse with him to hold, he'll steal the money in the purse. This would be pure stupidity about someone other than the shithead and money, and about someone other than the shithead being amoral, and maybe an assumption about someone other than the shithead having a job since it entails a doorman job that someone other than the shithead has.

 

Stupid people also think stupidly regarding other people and jobs, other people and money and other people in non-platonic situations because the stupid people delude themselves of things that are stupid. This is to ego-trip and/or to get mean.

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

Stupid people are of the opinion that you don't think that you have specific major rights that everyone else has. Or if you belong to a specific group, you and everyone else in your group don't have specific major rights or even minor rights that everyone else has. And that this is not just your opinion, it's the whole world's.

 

Stupid people get very mad at those who question the special privileges that the stupid people stupidly think they have. And the stupid people therefore place blame on them and retaliate. Stupid people also get mad at innocent people who let it be known that the stupid people have an intellectually incorrect opinion or that the stupid people are deluding themselves that something is true when it's not or that the stupid people's morals aren't up to par and thus they did somebody wrong. The stupid people conclude that not only do the people not have the right to display that the stupid people are wrong, the stupid people think that the people aren't allowed to think in the privacy of their own minds that the stupid people are wrong, even if they don't voice it or show it with a facial expression or through their body language. If they do, then they should be lashed out at. In short, stupid people think that they are the _thought police_ and _thought regulators_ and the owners of everyone's brains.

 

Stupid people think that adults care way more about looks when it comes to whom they get involved with in non-platonic ways (dating or sex. even if the person only intends to go out on one little date that will last part of an evening, a shithead thinks the person attaches all this importance to looks. if someone doesn't have that nice of a face or if they are average looking or they are a balding man or flabby, then no one in the world will go to the movies with them or have a one-night stand with them. this is especially true if the shithead is thinking about what a member of the gender s/he isn't will demand in a date or a sex partner. this probably doesn't even apply to females. in other words, a stupid woman probably has the wisdom of knowing that a female who is unattractive or average looking can procure a guy, but she might think it will take a while. a male shithead thinks that with all the billions of females in the world, a guy has to be a GQ model to get a date, or he has to be rich). This is because when you are a child you care only about the looks of every individual you want to get involved romantically with and nothing else. Male shitheads also think that people--especially members of the opposite sex--are unbelievably picky about countless other things when it comes to people they get romantically involved with or even go out on one little date with (like if some woman is just in town for the weekend and a friend offers to hook her up with a guy so they can double date and have something to do for the evening, the shithead will think that the guy's stats are even more of a big of a deal to her than what most women think that the stats should be in order for him to be good enough for her to marry). Her going to some stupid Adam Sandler movie with him is not only an event, but an event of the highest proportions). Stupid people think things like that people's casual dates and short-term dates and their boyfriends and girlfriends wives husbands sex partners boy toys mistresses etc. (and even platonic friends of theirs) represent and that everyone who isn't stupid also thinks that they represent. Therefore if some gal by the name of say Jane Doe is to go out with someone who's average looking or who doesn't make a lot of money or if there's something wrong with him like if he has a club foot or he acts quirky a little (he's a weirdo if he acts quirky, because there's no such concept as just being quirky to a shithead), or if he doesn't dress well, it'll make Jane Doe look like a piece of shit. The shitheads will assume that people will think that Jane Doe can't get anyone better. The shitheads will think that Jane Doe is worried terribly about what others think because shitheads--especially ones of low morals--think that the quality of everyone's character is way less than it is. So this Jane Doe is not nice and she has an oversized ego.

 

 

 

***

 

Some of the times when stupid people had gotten notions in their heads about other people, they were smart enough to know that the notions might not be true. But ... this is a rare phenomenon. They usually believed that the odds of the stupid notions being true had been way higher than them not being true. When they knew that the false notions were more unlikely than likely, they still didn't have the mentality to have an approximate idea of what the likelihood was.

 

When someone who isn't stupid states an assumption of theirs, even if they believe the assumption to be true as can be, they don't look and sound so knowing and authoritative and absolute like a shithead does when he states his assumptions that he believes with all his heart. Oftentimes when a shithead states one of his assumptions, it's quite apparent that he either can't be taught otherwise, or that if there is any chance that he can be taught otherwise, it'll take a fair amount of work and skill. It's also perceivable to someone who is an absolute stranger to the shithead who's bearing witness to him in the course of stating some assumption, that assuming is something that he does like it's going out of style.

 

Stupid people occasionally don't believe their assumptions to be true with a one hundred percent certainty. Occasionally, they believe their assumptions to be true with about a ninety-five to a ninety-nine-point-something percent certainty and this is because these really high percentages are still pretty darned black and white. That is to say, these numbers might be gray, but just barely. Usually, when someone who's stupid doesn't believe their assumptions to be true with a really really high certainty, this means that the assumptions are NOT so stupid that they're retarded. It also sometimes means that they are taking a guess in order to win an argument they find their dumb asses in due to them stating some other assumption of theirs or acting on it or due to them doing some other miscellaneous stupid thing. If they're taking guesses, and if they are willing to acknowledge that the guesses aren't as true as a compass, then they delude themselves that there is a pretty high chance that the things could be true.

 

Stupid people are always thinking they know how other people's brains work and therefore stupid people think they know what conclusions other people will draw from things and then how they will behave.

 

I forgot to mention that stupid people often think that at pretty much any given moment that they can trick you into thinking that whatever it is that you're stating, that you're somehow revealing with your words that you don't have some particular right.

 

For example, if you are a strong, young adult man in excellent health between the ages of eighteen and about forty-eight who tells a stupid person that you don't work or do anything and if he can gather that you'll poke your eardrums out with a screwdriver before you'll go out and bust your ass in the workforce, then the stupid person will conclude that he can now be the cause of you instantly thinking that you're amoral by him telling you that it's amoral of you to do nothing but resting your body and brain and having one hell of a good time and that it's amoral of you to have nothing but free time and that only members of the weaker sex who are young adults have the right to be unemployed by choice because society has an unwritten rule stating that young able-bodied adult males must take on a whole lot of responsibilities and that by you not being responsible at all means that you're just like a six-year-old playing hooky from school and that you're also just like a soldier who due to him being the combination of both a young adult and a male was drafted and is now AWOL and you're not being a team player and you're not being public-spirited and you're turning your back on society and you're not helping to contribute to society and that you should be working to make a public exhibition that you are loyal to society and that your lifestyle choice is an "offence against the collective conscience" and that you are lowering the attendance record of the employment history of all of the young men who've ever lived and that all of this isn't your prerogative and your own personal beeswax and nobody else's. The shithead will think that he can get you to believe him before he can say "knife," even if it's his opinion that this concept is bullshit. I've known two of them who made believe that they thought the above.

 

In other words, shitheads have made believe that most adults would take huge offence if you don't have female body parts and are between the ages of eighteen to about forty-seven and you deliberately don't have a job so that you can chill out and so that you can make whoopee and therefore everyone in the world can get disciplinary with you or other people can't, but the shitheads can because they are royalty to you. This is because a shithead, to ego-trip, might want to make believe with you that if you are a young man and not crippled and not in poor health, then it would spark global outrage if everyone in the world were to somehow find out that you exist and that all you do is laze in bed, fart around and do things that are fun to do and that you sully society all of the time because each and every time that you are getting some rest and each and every time that you are having a rockin' good time you are sullying society and that because in the history of humankind, mostly every young man who was able-bodied had busted their asses so much, that by you not busting your ass at all or just a little bit you are thereby altering the natural order of things for the worst, so if even one individual who is a stranger to you is to find out what you do with yourself and if they figure out that it has everything to do with you being a hedonist and a lazy bum, this therefore becomes a "public issue" and a "matter of public interest" and "public property" and not one hundred percent your business only and this stranger can tell you off and vent on you and if they can't, then the shithead can because he is royalty to you and other people who are royalty to you according to the shithead can tell you off and have you answer to them.

 

If a shithead genuinely feels that young adults have to work and at full-time and NOT part-time jobs unless they are lucky enough to have been born female, the shitheads will be of the opinion that it's their beeswax if someone who is a complete stranger or a virtual stranger to them is a young adult male but chooses to not have a job or to just have a part-time job for the purposes of getting to do literally nothing and to get to not have to exert himself and to get to partake in things that are howling good fun for unusually long periods of time.

 

Also if due to a shithead being in the know that you are a young man who saw to it that you are unemployed or underemployed that he has concluded that you are a sinner for you being so lazy, fun-loving, greedy (for free time and the subsequent R&R and joyous fun you're getting to have and for your freedom), over-indulgent, self-serving, selfish (for you thinking that your life matters more than everyone else in the world's life combined and so you can go against the wishes of most everyone in the world by you not working and by you spending so much time lazing and funning), solipsistic (because you are either so wrapped up in yourself and so out of it that it never even once occurred to you that the bulk of the seven billion people they say make up the world's population want so badly for you personally to have a job and that they'd therefore become upset if they are to somehow find out that you purposely don't have a job so that you can relax so much and do fun things, or you know what the world expects of you if you are a non-female adult no younger than about forty-six, however, you think that no one's feelings come into play here because you think that your life is the most important life in the 3.8 billion years they say there's been life on earth), immature, carefree and spoiled rotten, he will think that this is his beeswax and it's the beeswax of other people whom the shithead also besides himself deems are as much of an authority figure to you as this Asian couple who live down the hall from me are to their five-year-old and their four-year-old.

 

Another reason stupid people are frequently thinking things are extreme doesn't necessarily have everything to do with them being dichotomous thinkers and narrow-minded. Sometimes it's because they don't have the IQs to know how to properly measure things.

 

So if you make a mistake that anyone with half a brain would know is a small mistake and is trivial and inconsequential, a shithead will often falsely conclude that it's a huge mistake due to him not being able to even come close to measuring the size of it for the same reason that if you gave a retard a tape measure and told him to go measure a wall, he may come back and tell you that the wall is three inches high and one centimeter wide.

 

Another reason stupid people are frequently thinking things are extreme is because they don't always know how to draw conclusions for the same reason that if a retard saw _Happy Gilmore_, he would not know that it is not a good movie, and for the same reason that if you told a retard and a two-year-old that the kindergartner's finger painting hanging on a refrigerator is a great masterpiece of art and worth many millions, they would not know that it isn't.

 

Since the 1980s, I've noticed that umpteen stupid people who are morally inferior wouldn't admit to others and themselves that they were nasty to someone for no logical reason or that they did someone wrong somehow. If they will admit it, it's because they have the tiny amount of brains to know that there's no denying it and the way that they go about admitting it is by making up an irrelevant excuse to lecture, chastise and undermine the person whom they were nasty to for pointing it out to them. This is done _only_ when that person calls them out on it. They are skirting the issue and are making an attempt at acting smart because they feel stupid for not having the brains to attach importance to having good morals or for not having the wisdom to know that they didn't know right from wrong or that it's stupid to want to mess with someone. And the person was causing them to feel at a loss of control. I know of no instance of this behavior with a very stupid person whose morals measure up. But then again, I know of no very stupid person who's ever existed whose morals measure up. Stupid people would love nothing better than to think that they can do no wrong and for everyone to concur. In the one hundred and fifty thousand to two hundred thousand years that they say people have been on earth, no shithead who has had real low morals also wasn't conceited. These two things go hand in hand.

 

I know lots of examples of various stupid people thinking that other people's memories are the same as fishes' memories. And I am not exaggerating.

 

I have only met one adult whom I have deemed unbelievably stupid whom I will not declare was morally inferior. This is only and I mean only and I repeat only only only only because we were practical strangers (I knew him only from May to October 1986 at a job that I had. we worked at the same company, but on two different floors and it was a part-time job and thus I wasn't there much, so we hardly came in contact with one another), so he might have been morally inferior for all I know. Seeing that he's Puerto Rican, there is a likelihood that he was not a decent sort. As an aside, he was in his sixties or late fifties when I knew him, but when he was younger he used to own a beauty parlor and made a lot of money and this is because stupid people oftentimes know how to do well for themselves.

 

I've known four mildly retarded people and they were good enough Joes (one stole a wallet), and not counting them and probably not counting Puerto Ricans and half-breed Puerto Ricans that I've known, I definitely had to have known someone stupid who didn't have low morals, but I haven't ever noticed that they were stupid. This is either because:

 

(1)  it may be that most people who are born stupid grow up to be bad actors.

 

or

 

(2)  (for the most part) in order to show that you are stupid to people whom you don't know very well (like a coworker or a friend of a friend), it's imperative that you say something you assume about someone and practically the only incredibly narrow-minded and incredibly naive things that there are to assume about people are not good, so if a stupid person whose morals are up to scratch thinks something bad about his brother man, he will keep it to himself. Not only will you find out that stupid people who lack morals make incorrect unflattering and unkind assumptions about other people due to them speaking their minds if you are around them often enough, they mess with other people for stupid reasons. From there, this might lead to umpteen different kinds of ways that you obtain other proof of their stupidity. For example, they will show that they think that the person they've just made fun of is starting in with them if s/he's not submissive. Once in January 1988, I asked a coworker why he and Kevin don't get along. He replied, "He's jealous of me because I make fifty cents an hour more than him." With this information, I concluded that however many times it was that Kevin lashed out at Manny, Kevin didn't have the people smarts to know that there's a chance that Manny could read him, much less that it was a very very high chance. This also means that Kevin was nasty to our coworker as a direct result of Kevin having a low IQ. (If the shithead is a relative or a friend, then it will be obvious that s/he is a shithead if s/he is a good egg.)

 

Also, there are umpteen other miscellaneous ways that stupid people who are not respectful can betray that they are stupid.

 

I will give just one more example of this, but I could go on and on and on and on and on giving examples of this. I've never personally known even one individual who was both really intellectually inferior and morally inferior and who had a low-level working-class job that didn't pay much money and was in charge of people or in charge of something at their place of employment and didn't use their position to bullshit themselves that they were wealthy business professionals and power-trip while they were at it. This is not an overstatement. I searched my memory on lots and lots and lots and lots of different days and came up with no one. And by "really intellectually inferior" I don't mean slightly below average or slightly below slightly below average, I mean "shithead"!!!!

 

I've also counted three unsuccessful individuals who were shitheads and morally inferior who were nobody's bosses and who used to use people to delude themselves that they were corporate bosses while also power-tripping where they worked. One of them I only knew from watching the Howard Stern Show on the E Network and from listening to the Howard Stern Show on the radio [i.e., Gorilla]). There are other miscellaneous ways that shitheads who are losers delude themselves that their shitty jobs make them winners that have nothing to do with them messing with their fellows.

 

One other way you will see that someone you just met is a shithead is by the shithead acting on how he has the ego of twenty people combined.

 

Shitheads using jobs of theirs that suck shit to delude themselves that they have a prestigious professional title and make a lot of money is an example of how shitheads can be stupid regarding notions about jobs and money that have to do with not other people, but themselves.

 

There are countless different ways other than what I've already described that shitheads who have not achieved decent enough professional and/or monetary success in the jobworld act out of the ordinary and rage and get insecure. Their awareness of their lack of success also effects their overall happiness. This is because shitheads are great fools and so they have egos the size of Texas and so they can't handle the fact that they know that they don't have the expertise to be successful (they worry that this has to do with them not being smart) and that they don't have prestige, position, power, money, material things, that they are zeros etc. and that other people know these things.

__________________________________________________

 

Many stupid people think that people who have low level jobs come from unmoneyed families and that the only money they have is what they earn at their jobs and that their pockets are always empty because it takes all of their money to pay their bills (whether they live alone, have spouses, live with their significant others or have roommates) and that people who live at home who have low-paying jobs have no money in their pockets even though they have no bills to pay and that if someone has a low paying job he's thrilled to receive chump change and that chump change is big bucks in his opinion and that the only material objects that they get to have they must work for at their low-income job.

 

 

 

__________________________________________

I was telling my girlfriend a week ago that the three main ways that stupid people think stupidly is when it comes to them thinking about someone other than them that's non-platonic and the stupid people thinking notions about someone other than them that has to do with money and the stupid people thinking notions about someone other than them and jobs. Then she added that "illnesses" also cause them to think stupid things. I immediately realized that this rang a bell.

 

On lots of occasions, Princess Leia told me that Captain Crunch is always thinking that he is a very sick man and that he doesn't know the difference between feeling well and feeling sick.

 

Princess Leia told me a handful of times that he thinks that he has bronchitis. He told me this a few times too. I have no memory of hearing him cough and I've heard people who cough who've had bronchitis and so if I had heard him coughing like them, I would have noticed.

 

Once I called Princess Leia on her cell phone to ask her a quick question. I knew that she was at Captain Crunch's house and so before I picked up the phone to make the call, I wondered whether in the two minutes or less that I would probably be speaking to her, if Captain Crunch will be capable of not involuntarily displaying that he is of a hugely inferior intellect. Around thirty seconds into our conversation, I heard him griping in the background and so Princess Leia told me that he is talking about how he didn't feel well and she said, "He's fine, the guy." Then, to patronize him and to get a laugh, she asked him what was the matter with him, and I heard him declare, "I have a walking pneumonia."

 

Once, Princess Leia was talking to the shithead on the phone when his friend Jumping Jack Flash was at his house. She heard Jumping Jack Flash in the background laughing his head off because he was reading a lengthy list of medical problems the shithead thought that he had which he kept taped to a wall. Princess Leia told me a lot of the things he had put on his list and the only one that I remember was "busted leg."

 

Stupid people think that everything is either black or white with no other shades and so if there was merely just something but a wee bit wrong with his leg, then that would be a gray concept, so it just had to be busted. His leg can only either be perfect or busted. If I had to bet my life, I would say that there was absolutely nothing whatsoever wrong with his leg. Jumping Jack Flash knew better than the shithead about the shithead's own body.

 

Princess Leia told me that in Arizona (I think during the summer if I remember right, but if not the summer, then some other warm season. it must have been the summer because they were in Arizona to go to a wedding), at a pool that Captain Crunch was wearing a sweater and so this woman they had just recently met asked her if he's a hypochondriac.

 

I asked Princess Leia if she had told the shithead that the woman asked her that and Princess Leia told me that she didn't because there would be no point in telling him that since he knew that the woman had had sex with a man that she had just met there at the hotel.

 

Princess Leia didn't explain why she thought this information about the woman would have to do with why it would be a waste of time telling him that she figured out that he's a hypochondriac, but I know why nonetheless. He would have thought that it makes no difference what she thinks because her having sex at the hotel means she's stupid, so her opinion doesn't count. He would have been feeling disgust by the thought of her and so therefore he wouldn't be able to concentrate on what he had just heard.

 

Princess Leia said that the woman at the pool was "weirded out" about Captain Crunch wearing a sweater at the pool, so this is another reason I think that it must have been hot or warm out and that this was during the summer.

 

The reasons stupid people have their intellects fail them miserably when it comes to illnesses is because the illnesses are the illnesses of people and stupid people don't know people.

 

On three-way, I once secretly listened in on a telephone conversation between Princess Leia and Captain Crunch's mother and Princess Leia told Captain Crunch's mother that Captain Crunch is always thinking that he's sick and Princess Leia went into a little bit of detail about it. Captain Crunch's mother laughed and said something about how he doesn't know the difference between feeling well and feeling sick.

 

Another way illnesses can foment stupidity in a shithead is by him assuming that other people are sickly and by him assuming specific conditions and side effects of illnesses and how illnesses are spread.

 

They also make assumptions about how other people became sick. If the assumption is a false assumption about a person having a specific illness, the shithead sometimes makes an assumption about how they became ill. Shitheads also make assumptions about how people can become ill. They also argue with people about how you can't get sick from something that has been established can make you sick.

 

In the summer of 1992, I mentioned to Captain Crunch on at least two different days that I jogged two miles a day and dieted. Soon after that (that same year, in the summer), on two occasions, he explained to me that the reason why I was underweight was because I had AIDS.

 

Princess Leia once told me that the shithead assumed that he had a medical problem with his penis. I forgot what the thing is that he assumed was wrong with him, but she said that he went to one of the top doctors in the country who specializes in whatever the thing is that he assumed was wrong with him. She said that the doctor told the shithead that there's nothing wrong with his penis and that the doctor even offered to show the damnfool his own penis to prove it and that he explained to the numbskull something about how his body would have to work differently than every other person's body in order for what the doctor told him to not be true. Princess Leia complained to me about Captain Crunch still assuming that he had the medical problem after leaving the doctor's office. So I made a joke and said, "He knows more than Captain Crunch." In a loud and angry voice, she sarcastically said, "Just a drop!"

 

Starting from the first day that I hung out with the shithead (in March 1992), I told him that I have OCD and various ways it was effecting me when I was hanging out with him. That day he saw me repeat having to do something because that's a symptom of OCD, so he declared with authority, "You're crazy." I can tell that he meant it and that he told me this as a knee jerk reaction. I.e., that instantly labeling people things like crazy, weird, stupid, punks etc. based on tiny things or falsely perceived things is what this relative stranger does and that he is narrow-minded in umpteen other different ways. Years later, I told him that I have OCD and how I have to repeat doing things and he declared again, "You're crazy." The year that I met him I went to two psychopharmacologists to get prescribed medicine for OCD and I told the shithead that I was on Prozac for OCD. In 1996, I told him that I was worried about getting panic attacks, so I would purposely hold my breath to get panic attacks because I have OCD and that I had to go to the Emergency Room. Before that, in probably 1994 or in 1993, he had just shoplifted a bottle from PetLand. He gave me the bottle to hold and so I was worried that I might drop the bottle and so I would keep on releasing my grip and so after a few minutes of doing that I had wound up dropping the bottle. I explained that this had to do with my OCD habit. So since I in a way dropped the bottle on purpose, this shithead thought that I did it entirely on purpose. So he got mad and left me on the street. A few minutes earlier, he explained to me that I dropped the bottle because I am jealous of him because he can get things from PetLand for free because he's a shoplifter and I'm not. The shithead knows that I get everything I want for free and easier than having to go shoplift the things because I buy it with my credit cards and my aunt gets sent the bill and because I get an allowance. If I remember correctly, he would shoplift bottles at the pet shop, then return the bottles for store credit, then use the store credit to get dog food for his dog--and all I had to do to get dog food for my dog was to use one of my credit cards and I wouldn't have to reimburse my aunt one half-pence piece. If that's not stupid enough, the reason we were at PetLand was because since he's a shoplifter, I had come up with some kind of scheme for him to profit financially by obtaining a filter for fish tanks illegally and then returning it for cash. It worked and he made a hundred-something dollars. And if that's not stupid enough, I intended for him to keep on doing the scheme and he has, which lead to him probably making a couple hundred thousand dollars and maybe close to seven figures with similar schemes that gradually got more and more advanced. The first few schemes, came from obtaining store credits, which eventually lead to making fake store credits which eventually lead to other similar things that gave him ideas for obtaining and selling stolen merchandise and passing off cheap clothes for designer clothes and umpteen other things. Like I would not want him to profit by obtaining a free bottle that cost about ten or fifteen bucks due to him being a shoplifter but I don't mind him getting about a hundred dollars in cash due to him being a shoplifter. This is also a typical example of a way that a shithead can manage to somehow combine their most collectively assumed things that not even one rare shithead doesn't assume like it's 1999. I.e., this is an assumption about other people and money combined with other people not having good morals and other people being fools (because if I was jealous of him over something so petty and to the point where I sabotage him by fixing it so he has to spend chump change on one or two bags of dog food, I would be being stupid) and that everyone in the world is exactly like the shithead (i.e., the reason why I don't have good morals is because he doesn't).

 

In June 2005, the shithead asked me if I think that he's a buffoon due to someone telling him that I frequently state that the shithead is a shithead and give examples to back this fact up and due to me a moment earlier telling him that his former girlfriend told me that he's a buffoon. Therefore, to prove to the shithead that he is a buffoon, I told him lots of different reasons why I think that he's a buffoon and at least three of the things that I told him had to do with his intellect failing him humongously regarding illnesses and this was about a decade before my fiancee told me that stupid people show that they are stupid by saying stupid things about illnesses.

 

There are many other examples of said shithead and illnesses I can give.

 

About as soon as my aunt told me how she figured out that my uncle had Alzheimer's is when I guessed that right after a doctor officially informs him of this, that he will actually resort to deluding himself that he's as healthy as a horse. One of the reasons I was able to figure this out is because every one of the umpteen times we would argue about the three main things that cause every shithead on earth to falsely assume, he would delude himself into thinking that every tiny little thing I told him was untrue, even though he could not care less if it was. This is because he didn't want to face the fact that he's not as smart as he originally thought.

 

And if the blasted old fool will without thinking twice and without batting an eye delude himself that countless things are completely false that wouldn't matter one drop to him if his intellect wasn't on the line and that don't have jack shit to do with him and are all as trivial as can be (for example, that horse's rear end once deluded himself that it is more than likely that a guy I once crossed paths with for like fourteen seconds in a subway station was not gay), of course he's going to see fit to delude himself that he isn't going to be dead soon because he doesn't have a deadly disease with no cure and one which will turn his mind to mush. Because what could be more important to someone about themselves than whether or not they are going to be dead soon and be a walking vegetable before they die. I would say that nothing else could be even a smidgeon as important. Needless to say his strategy to employ his magical powers that he thought that he had so that he could turn back time to change it so that he never had this particular disease worked out so well for him he is therefore currently in an urn on the mantelpiece of his son's fireplace or somewhere.

 

Another reason I figured out that he will before long go deluding himself that he's "the epitome of health" is because like a trout knows to return upstream to its hatching ground or die trying, like a baby cuckoo bird the exact second it hatches knows to without ado start pushing all of the eggs that haven't hatched out of the nest, it's a natural instinct when you're a shithead to always be deluding yourself that all kinds of undesirable things about you aren't really so AND that things that you don't give a flying goat's fart about are also not really so. That is to say, I compared his dumb-assery to his peers. A shoe salesman sells shoes, dogs bark, bees buzz, a shithead on a non-stop basis thinks he's magically wishing away whatever it may be that he overmuch desires to not be untrue. A shithead usually knows that he can't do this kind of magic when it comes to things that he only slightly minds being true. In other words, shitheads believe that if they mind very much that something is true that it therefore is something that they can magically wish into an untruth--BUT if they just mind a little that something is true, then they know that they have to accept it.

 

If I search my memory, I'm sure I can recall other shitheads who've had their intellects fail them about illnesses. Every time a shithead makes an assumption about someone being crazy or takes a guess about someone being crazy or makes up a lie about someone being crazy that's based on a narrow-minded concept, the shithead is making a display that he is exhibiting a behaviorism of being a shithead. To state the obvious, this is because if he is saying that someone is crazy, he is saying that they have a mental illness.

 

________________________________________________

 

Thom Hartmann read an article on his radio show about how stupid people don't trust other people and it mentioned that people whose intellects are up to par are more trusting of others. I copied and pasted two paragraphs of the article below.

 

Conventional wisdom has us believe that those at the lower end of the intelligence spectrum are more unguarded and trusting, but this is apparently not the case.

It is those with a higher IQ who are in fact likely to be more trusting of others according to new research.

 

This finding supports what other researchers have argued, namely that being a good judge of character is a distinct part of human intelligence which evolved through natural selection.

 

________________________________________________

 

Stupid people often don't have a general idea of what things that they don't have to feel stupid for not knowing.

 

Stupid people very often are smart enough to know that they can't get you to believe that whatever it is that you happen to be declaring at any given moment is something that is definitely untrue and so they settle for trying to get you to be under the impression that it very well may not be true. In other words, they think that they can get you to wonder whether it's true or not. All the other times that they are undermining you when you are declaring something, what they are thinking is that it's a toss-up that you will believe them with all your heart or that maybe the odds are about one out of three or four that you will believe them with all your heart and that sometimes the odds are a little better than average. I don't think I know of any instance of a stupid person being smart enough to know that he was going to fail at trying to trick someone into thinking that they were in the course of physically doing something wrong though.

 

For example, say that there is some woman pushing a baby carriage down the street and some shithead wants to bust her balls. He will think that whatever he so happens to think up on the fly that he knows is incorrect, that the odds are a hundred percent that after he moves his lips to tell her, she will swallow it hook, line and sinker. For example, if he decides to fake being angry and appalled in order to lie and tell her that the sun is too strong for her to not keep the canopy down that she will thus think that she's being stupid. If instead of that, he gets the idea to tell her that she's moving too quickly and that there is some kind of a chance that she will crash the baby carriage, the shithead will think that she'll agree. Or instead of that, the shithead will think that if he tells her the complete opposite of her moving too quickly--if he tells her that she's moving too slow and so she's in people's way and that they're having to walk around her and that she's causing them to have to walk slower that she will be thinking that it's not her prerogative to walk at whatever speed she likes and that this is the shithead's business and that she is stupid for not knowing how fast she has to walk and that she's the only one who'd be pushing a baby carriage that slowly.

 

In a nutshell, stupid people oftentimes know that it's not a hundred percent that they can get you to believe that everything that you assert with your mouth is bullshit, but they think that it IS a hundred percent that they can get you to think that whatever you're in the midst of doing (for example: combing your hair, dialing a telephone number, mowing a lawn, parking your car) that you're not doing a good job of it and that what they are making believe is something of a colossal magnitude.

 

Stupid people think that they have such _thought control_ over others that if a stupid person decides to delude himself of something brand-new right now as I am typing, he will think that he has also gotten the whole world to believe the thing(s) that he is deluding himself about.

 

I don't know whether or not I've made it clear that stupid people also think stupidly when it comes to themselves and money, themselves and jobs and their opinions about non-platonic things that have to do with them and that don't necessarily have to do with them trying to crawl inside the brains of anyone else.

 

One other slightly common thing that I've noticed about lots of the very stupidest people I've ever met is that if they are aware that someone did something unusual based on some unusual extenuating circumstance, sometimes the shitheads will still think that person will do the unusual thing again under normal circumstances. For example, say that there is a Grade-A shithead who knows that some woman came out of the shower naked to find that her house was on fire and so she ran out of the house naked and that if she did not do that, she would have been burned alive otherwise. Even though the Grade-A shithead fully understands that she came out of the house naked due to her not having any clothes to wear and that her entire house was engulfed in flames and that she had no other choice but to do that, otherwise she'd lose her life, the Grade-A shithead might think that she might come out of the house naked just because it's Tuesday and that she doesn't have a good head on her shoulders and that she is a loose woman and a public exhibitionist and that she was always a public streaker.

 

It is a behavior pattern of being a shithead to think that no one should have a hobby or pastime that the shitheads themselves are disinterested in--especially if it is something that would be anathema to them. I mentioned this already, but only once, so it bears repeating.

 

Another reason why when a shithead realizes that the people whom he's arguing with are the ones who have the intellectually correct opinions, that the shithead continues arguing with them and doesn't ever acknowledge to them and to himself that he was wrong or if he silently stands there listening to the people he's arguing with opine and prove to the shithead that he was wrong and that they were right, that he will try to get back at them later on is because being a shithead means being a fool and a fool has foolish priorities and so he places a world of importance on things like thinking of himself as a smartie and not having to face the fact that he wasn't smart enough to know what the real deal is and that he has stupid opinions, and having the people he's arguing with conclude that he's a smartie, and getting in the last word, coming out on top, winning, having the people he's arguing with know that he won the argument, not feeling at a loss of control, making sure that people who have the brains to win arguments with him and who dare to undermine him get punished for it all.

 

Stupid people also think that they have to prove to themselves and to others that they know everything about some particular subject or field. The less they know, the more they feel they have to prove that they are experts on it.

 

If you are to find yourself in an argument with a real real real real stupid person and you therefore tell him why what he's saying is untrue and if the thing you're telling him is some fact that nobody but you or a psychic could possibly be in the know about, he will not give up arguing with you.

 

I didn't stress enough how often it is that similarities confuse stupid people or give enough examples of similarities confusing stupid people, so lemme give some more. In the early 1990s, black people started to move into Forest Hills, New York. So one reason besides property values having just plummeted that caused Captain Crunch to conclude they moved into the neighborhood was because one of the main buildings that they moved into is called "The Howard" and so he declared--and I quote--"it's tasty to them" because there's a black college called Howard University. This is also a case of stupid people thinking that everyone is stupid because something this tiny causing a human being to feel a connection and giving them comfort and a feeling of familiarity and feeling at home would mean that they're stupid. If a shithead is aware of anyone's life decisions, then leave it to him to find a way to assume they are big dummies. This brings up another point. It's also a behavior pattern of being a shithead to assume stupidly when it comes to other people and places where they live. It is also a behavior pattern of being a shithead to think stupidly when it comes to places where they themselves live.

 

One thing that I've noticed about some of the stupidest people I've interacted with in all my years is that when not just me but when anyone tries disabusing them of one their assumptions by telling them not only something that makes perfect sense, but something that is the only possible explanation for what the real deal can be and that is also self-explanatory, the shitheads still don't get the picture.

 

All throughout this letter I've been saying that all shitheads somehow know to get stupid when it comes to non-platonic notions that have to do with other people and not them. This is not to say that I cannot remember a ton of examples of shitheads being stupid when it comes to non-platonic notions about themselves being involved with people. One way that they get stupid when it comes to non-platonic things about themselves is when they are thinking about why people they are involved with in non-platonic ways like them. This is because they are trying to get inside the heads of someone else and that's not their suit. In other words, it takes more brains to know why someone likes you then it does to know why you like them.

 

One thing that I have noticed about shitheads when they are at their jobs that suck a hole and are in the course of deluding themselves that they are at the top executive level by acting out their delusions on others, is that there wasn't even one time that any of the many shitheads I've incessantly observed doing this were able to fully delude themselves. I was able to tell that they knew all too well they're not kidding themselves. Sometimes, part of their brains had been deluded, but not too big of a part. For example, these shitheads will make believe that they are angry because someone is both slacking off and that s/he's not slacking off at all, s/he's not smart enough to know how to do something that a well-trained monkey can do when it's only theoretically possible for one of these things to be true, and said shitheads will speak in a voice and have a facial expression and body language that means that they are feeling angry and bitter and bothered about something other than what they're talking about. This is on account of how they are not doing a good enough job at convincing themselves that they succeeded in business, are careerists, are rich, have business acumen, social prestige, power etc. and they are feeling bitter and pissed about what their lives are really like and their future.

 

Stupid people think that if someone belongs to a different group than them that the people who belong to some of the different groups are like dumb animals who do things out of sheer instinct. The most narrow-minded and retarded example I can give of this is in 1992, I got into at least three different arguments with Captain Crunch on at least three different days about whether or not I had ever went out on dates with women who were coworkers of mine. He explained to me that girls won't go out with guys who work at their place of employment because when the relationship ends that they have to associate with the guy and be near him.

 

The reason why we argued about this the second time that we did was because since he had told me this assumption once before, when I was telling him something about one of the girls, I deliberately threw in the irrelevant information that she was a former coworker just to see if he would be like 'Hold it right there! Girls won't go out on dates with guys who work where they work ....."

 

The fourth day he saw fit to bring this assumption up was because I again mentioned in passing that someone I went out with was a coworker in order to see if he would say that girls won't go out with guys who are coworkers of theirs. I was close. In a semi-confused voice he said something along the lines of, "I thought that girls won't go out with their coworkers." Then, I told him that they will and he said something like, "Oh, I thought they don't."

 

This is because--knowing this shithead--he heard one and only one girl say that she won't go out with coworkers because she doesn't want to have to still associate with them after they break up and so since she is a female this means that her mind is linked to every other female in the 150 to 200 thousand years they say people have been in existence.

 

If the most buffoonish possibility is that it was only one girl he had heard declare this is her policy, well then that means that it wasn't as many as two.

 

Also, he is too stupid to know that she would break her rule because that would be gray. This is because stupid people think that if you don't like something that you won't partake in it unless you are forced to.

 

Like a female praying mantis bites the head off its mate, a female human turns down male coworkers for dates, so if there's some pregnant woman you come across somewhere, if the baby in her stomach is female, when the baby becomes of working age and gets a job, it's in her genes to under no circumstances go out on one single date with any of the males where she works who ask her out because she will not want to be around them so frequently if they stop dating. But males don't mind being around female coworkers they used to date because a human male brain is as different to a human female brain as a mouse's brain is to a dolphin's brain. Plus, no one can theoretically just mind something a little bit.

 

The shithead is a male, so he made no assumptions about how if a person is born a male they have instincts like an animal.

 

Once, when I was arguing with the shithead about whether or not some girl I went out with a handful of times when we worked together was a platonic or non-platonic friend, since on a number of different previous occasions, I had told him that she was bisexual and things about it, I had purposely referred to her as a lesbian to see if he would thus declare in a peremptory tone that she is a lesbian; meaning that she is not physically attracted to me because I am not female. I did this for a few reasons. I was testing my theory that a shithead will take advantage of every opportunity to win an argument. I was almost one hundred percent certain that his intellect is so unbelievably inferior that he would think that he can get me to believe that he can teach me that someone he never saw before and whom I knew rather well is gay and that I got it in my head that we were a couple and that those were dates that we went on because I'm stupid and I was curious about whether or not I had this big of a shithead on my hands. And I wanted to bear witness to this unbelievably over the top example of a shit intellect in order to be amazed.

 

It's a behavior pattern of shitheads who are male to think that females have all these trivial factors that they deem vital for determining whether or not they will go out with guys. And thus this is one of many reasons why if a guy isn't strikingly handsome or wealthy and famous that getting a date with any member of the opposite sex is one of the hardest things in the world to do and impossible for some guys.

 

Shitheads don't know how to use their heads, so Captain Crunch didn't know to try to think back to see if he can remember anyone who isn't a male who got involved with a coworker of the opposite sex in a non-platonic way. This also has to do with shitheads being unfathomably narrow-minded and so for him if he were to try to remember if he's ever known a female who went out with a coworker of hers or who has had sex with a coworker of hers, then this would be a case of him thinking just a drop broadmindedly.

 

A shithead also sometimes thinks that if you belong to a different group than him, you are less intelligent than him. For example, Princess Leia once told me that Captain Crunch explained to her that the female characters in the TV show Sex and the City having lots of sex with lots of different men "confuses women." Then she said, "He thinks that women are mindless." One reason he expected her to agree is because stupid people don't know how adults think.

 

Or if you belong to some of the same groups as the shithead does, you and everyone else in your group but him are stupid. He is exempt. He is the exception to his rule. By a huge coincidence, he is the only one ever who this doesn't have to have it apply to him. For example, Captain Crunch thinks that everyone who has a low-level low-paying unskilled or partially skilled job is not just stupid but incredibly so, and in the entire time that I knew him, he had nothing but low-level low-paying unskilled jobs, but he deemed his own intellect way way superior. There are a few other things that he did a whole lot that he thinks means that anyone other than him who does it is definitely of an inferior intellect and that there can't be any mitigating circumstances to explain why they do it. And on top of that, none of the things had at all meant that your IQ is one fraction of a point less for doing it.

 

_________________________________

Stupid people tell lots of lies when they argue with other people, and especially if the argument has to do with who has the intellectually correct opinion.

 

Stupid people take to luxury cars like a duck to water. A really stupid man will have at least one if he is affluent and if he's not affluent, he will very very often find a way to swing it. If he is really wealthy, he will likely have more than one luxury car. Or, maybe the stupid man would have to not be a good egg for it to be a certainty that he will own a luxury car if he is a man of means? Yes, I think so. I have yet to meet someone I know for a fact is both stupid and amoral, so I cannot say for sure. Also, a shithead who cannot afford to own a luxury car will sometimes buy the most expensive car that he can afford to. I once knew a shithead who was a friend of a friend of mine and the shithead was crazy about luxury cars and when he was young, he bought one of the bottom-of-the-line BMW's and it was such a low-end model that it wasn't a luxury car, but it was the closest that he could come to having one of his own and he wanted the brand name.

 

Stupid people don't know when you're not really going to do something that you have no intention of doing and don't expect anyone to actually think that you are going to do if you say that you are going to do it or talk about the concept of you doing it.

 

Feebs are always thinking that people aren't smart enough to know when they're being blatantly antagonized and repeatedly harassed. Feebs are also always thinking that they can very easily trick everybody into thinking that they mistakenly think that someone was antagonizing them and being hostile to them and that the person who was messing with them was behaving just fine. Even if it's ongoing. Feebs also think that they can trick everyone into thinking that someone has the right to mess with them. Usually when a feeb is trying to trick someone who was treated badly into thinking that the person had every right to treat them the way that they did, the feeb is also trying to trick himself. This is because in this scenario, it usually was the feeb who was messing with the person that was being messed with and all feebs would love nothing better than to think that they can do no wrong. Or, the feeb is defending someone for some stupid reason and is taking sides.

 

All of the most arrogant people I've come across were dummies. Not mostly all--all. They also had low morals.

 

When a stupid person isn't one hundred percent certain that he can make you think that whatever it is that you are declaring at the moment is wrong, then he operates under the two theories that (1) whatever the lie or the hopefully lucky guess that he instantaneously thinks up to tell you as his rebuttal is, it just might turn out to be something that will lead you to definitely conclude that whatever it is that you are declaring at the moment is wrong and that (2) if he now tells you a lie to shoot down what you've just told him or if he takes a guess about why something you've just told him is wrong, that it is more likely than unlikely that he will be the cause of you now wondering whether or not whatever it is that you are declaring is wrong. I'm not sure if I mentioned number 2 already, but since this is one of the biggest behavior patterns of being stupid, I'm mentioning it now just to make sure it's in here.

 

If shitheads are on a mission to insult you--especially if there's some particular thing that they want to insult you for, they take advantage of all the opportunities that they get to do it--just like they take advantage of all opportunities to try to win arguments.

 

There are four main ways that all the shitheads alive think that they are tricky little devils who within the time span of a heartbeat can very easily get everyone alive or dead to believe any stupid lie. (1) Whenever shitheads are arguing with people, they will instantaneously make up something to shoot down everything they've just gotten told. By "everything," this even entails things that no one but the people the shitheads are arguing with could have any knowledge of and things that a three-year-old child would know are basic facts of life. (2) If the shitheads like to get mean, they will sometimes make up some extemporaneous stupid lie to tell people in order to give them grief. If the shitheads have inferior morals and are straw bosses and/or are in charge of something small and unimpressive at their place of business, they will ALL use their asshole jobs to delude themselves that they get to be big shots and to power-trip by (3) extemporaneously making believe that other workers are in the course of slacking off and are breaking a rule and aren't smart enough to know how to do the thing that they're doing no matter how easy it is to do or that the coworkers don't know what work needs to be done. Even shitheads who are no one's bosses and are in charge of nothing ego-trip in these ways where they work.

 

I've slightly known Puerto Ricans whom from both what I could tell from me interacting with them and from peoples' accounts of them that they must have been shitheads, but I don't know for sure whether they were shitheads. Also, what's interesting is that Puerto Ricans seem to have the morals of a gnat. Also, what's interesting is that for years and years and years I've been hearing people say that Puerto Ricans are stupid and/or amoral--even other Hispanics have said so. Because this is all so, and because I know of no one of any race who is stupid and not amoral, this is all also evidence that if Mother Nature made you stupid that she also made you immoral. That is to say, you came out defective.

 

Shitheads thinking that they have the right to antagonize anyone they want and threaten people who offend them and that the people whom the shitheads antagonize and threaten have to shrug it off, and shitheads thinking that they get to be royalty to people and shitheads thinking that their relatives, friends and special people whom the shitheads care about for miscellaneous reasons have the right to antagonize and threaten anyone the shitheads don't care about and shitheads thinking that their relatives, friends and special people get to be royalty to anyone they want to be royalty to just as long as the shitheads don't care about the people, is yet another way that shitheads don't know people. To state the obvious, this is because shitheads think that the world revolves around them and that some people's lives have more value than others and they don't have a clue that all people's lives are exactly equal.

 

Stupid people get mad at you when they find out that you are smarter than they thought if they are trying to trick you into thinking something and you fail to fall for it and so much so that they blame you for not being born as stupid as they originally thought; with their logic being that you're supposed to have somehow been able to prevent yourself from being born with the IQ that nature gave you and that you should have a rooting interest in yourself being born stupid and that when they were passing out brains that you should have gotten on the line that says "stupid" in order to please the shitheads.

 

If you are arguing with a shithead who knows that you have the intellectually correct opinion, then he will shoot down everything you tell him with him thinking that he can get you to believe that everything that comes out of your mouth is a display that your intellect isn't up to snuff and that you need to learn something from him. He will expect you to believe that you are so stupid that you can't say anything at all that isn't proof positive that you don't have the mind of a young child and that you are not a great fool. This is going to happen even if he admits that you are right about what you're stating because his way of admitting that you are right will be by him making up an excuse to lecture, chastise and undermine you for something totally irrelevant.

 

People who are stupid also think that they can get you to think that you've always had a particular opinion about something that has never once been your opinion and won't ever be. They think that they even can do this while you are smack dab in the course of displaying how you know the opposite of what they want you to believe is what's really the opinion. They think they are so good at getting you to believe that you have any opinion that is in their best interest for you to have that it just takes them like four seconds to make you think that you've never thought otherwise. The opinions that they try to get you to think are yours, mostly always are things that never were in your mind and rightly so.

 

Stupid people think that they own things that they don't own even a drop of. Some of them even think that they own human beings.

 

Besides shitheads being narrow-minded, one reason why it's sometimes a waste of your time trying to explain something to them that is not in their thought process or that means that they're going to have to think a drop broadmindedly and to think outside their box or that refutes an old idea that they got in their heads, is because some shitheads are unimaginative and so they don't have the imagination to imagine what you are telling them.

 

Stupid people don't like to admit to themselves that someone taught them something that they didn't know and stupid people don't like to allow other people to know that they taught them something that they didn't know. One reason is because when someone tells a stupid person something that they didn't know, it causes them to feel at a loss of control. Another reason, to state the obvious, is because they like to be know-it-alls. The things that they mind terribly not knowing can be things that don't in any way, shape or form mean that (a) you're not an expert at something and that (b) your intellect is even one drop worse for not knowing and (c) things that you would have to be a psychic to know or things that you would have to have inside information about.

 

I have absolutely no way of knowing if I have ever once known anybody who isn't a shithead, but who's had as big of an ego as the shitheads whom I've known or heard tell of. This is because the people who aren't shitheads would have the tiny amount of wisdom to know that if they acted on how big their ego is, that people would be able to ascertain that about them. Also, they would know when it's a lost cause trying to dupe people they're arguing with into concluding that they have intellectually incorrect opinions and so they give up arguing with people once they find out that they had an incorrect take on something.

 

Stupid people who are amoral are the biggest buffoons of them all. There are lots of reasons why this is so. To name a few. They keep on arguing with people after being presented with evidence that they were wrong when they know that by doing this that they are upsetting the people they know to hold the intellectually correct opinion. They tell people unflattering assumptions they've made about them when someone who is stupid and not amoral will keep it to themselves. If they don't have a pretty big career and if they don't make a lot of money and if they are a straw boss and/or in charge of something that's rinky dink, it is no less than one hundred percent that they will unrelentingly mess with people to pretend that they are a success story and to power-trip. And they take to doing these two things like a duck to water. In other words, immediately upon starting their new job or getting promoted to some lower management position they start ego-tripping in these two ways.

 

One thing that I have about a thousand examples of are times that lots and lots and lots of different shitheads had found it easier to delude themselves of things due to the things being narrow-minded, black-and-white, undetailed and overly simplistic concepts. That's because they're right at home thinking narrow-mindedly and at over-simplifying.

 

One thing that happens when (not counting with the slow or the mildly retarded) you tell people who have the worst intellects you'll ever deal with why an assumption of theirs is wrong, is that they will reply by telling you an assumption, a guess or a lie about what you had just told them is wrong and then for you telling them why that's wrong they will tell you an assumption, a guess or a lie about why what you've just told them is wrong and this will process will keep on repeating itself. It may stop due to the shithead doing something like making up an excuse to lecture, chastise and undermine you about something that's as irrelevant as can be or to patronize you, but it will start up again a moment later in the argument. I have had many conversations like this with lots of shitheads. Some of them with two different shitheads which had gone on for about forty minutes and maybe even an hour. The same topics were later discussed on different days with these two shitheads--which again went on for about forty minutes--but sometimes only about twenty minutes and a half of an hour and then again they would tell me assumptions, guesses and lies about things that I told them, and upon them doing that, I'd tell them why what they've just told me is wrong and then they would without hesitation tell me an assumption, guess or lie about that and so on and so on. The reason why I didn't have conversations of this length with other shitheads besides these two is because all of the other shitheads that I've dealt with were coworkers, friends of my friends and a superintendent of a building that I lived in and a shithead who was a perfect stranger to me whom I dealt with for about two or three minutes once in the year 1987. The reason why I didn't ever have this kind of conversation with my mildly retarded former friend whom I knew for years and years like I did with my uncle and with Captain Crunch is because my mildly retarded friend didn't have the imagination of my uncle and Captain Crunch because my mildly retarded friend was their intellectual inferior by far and he was not amoral like them. Plus, my two mildly retarded friends didn't have egos and this could possibly be because they didn't have enough brains to be full of themselves and to get insecure.

 

I've never met a shithead or heard tell of a shithead who didn't have buffoonish priorities.

 

When a shithead knows that you have proven to him that he has made a false assumption about you and/or that he has read you all wrong and if he also knows that he doesn't stand any chance at all at inventing lies to make you believe that he isn't wrong, he will continue to try to make you believe that you haven't convinced him that he is wrong. One of the reasons he does this is because he thinks that he will be impressing you with what a high IQ he has. In other words, even though he knows full well that you know that he made an assumption about you that isn't remotely true and that the things that you have just explained to him why you're right all are as plain as day, he thinks that you will deem him "a smartie" if he can only trick you into believing that he can't be made to learn the truth, no matter what you say. This is because he thinks that you're going to thereby be made to think that he knows that he's a smartie and that he has all this genuine confidence in his intellect and that he's never been wrong before and that it's just a fluke that just this time he is. That is to say, he's thinking that you're saying to yourself, "Gee, this guy is such a smart cookie that up till just now, he's never built up anything in his mind about someone that is way off the mark, and so he's thinking 'Why should now be any different?' and who can blame him?" And if you interact with the shithead a whole lot and for years and years and so you always get into arguments with him due to him telling you his cacophrenic assumptions about you or someone else and you therefore repeatedly prove to him that the assumptions are wrong, then he will without a doubt still continue to try to trick you into thinking that he's not convinced even though he knows that doing this won't result in him tricking you into thinking that he is right. He will not have the ounce of brains that it takes to remember that he even one time in the past failed at getting you to agree with him about how any assumption that he told you is true, so he will be thinking that this is the first time that you are aware of how he made a false assumption and you're thinking that it's not going to happen again.

 

Stupid people think that their family members' lives have more value than those who aren't part of their family. And not only that, they expect everyone who isn't related to them to fully agree with them about the validity of this. I seriously doubt that I've ever learned of any past examples of this. It just goes without saying that it's true.

 

I already mentioned that a shithead can't be taught something is true that only a shithead wouldn't know is true or that it might be true if he desperately doesn't want it to be true. He also usually can't be taught something is true if he doesn't care that it's not true and if it has no meaning to him. In other words, he will forget that you have proved to him that some assumption of his that's monumental and stupid is wrong, if he couldn't care less whether it is or isn't wrong and if what you tell him is something that doesn't hold his attention when you get done speaking. He won't have the wisdom to deem it significant and he might not have a good enough memory to remember. Stupid people don't spend time thinking about things that they don't care about. If he doesn't care that it's not true, then he won't respect that it's not true.

 

If a stupid person tells you an assumption about you, even if it's bad, or if he tells you something that he suspects about you, even if it's bad, or if he tells you a lie about you that's bad, the shithead might lash out at you if you tell him that it's not true and especially if you tell him why it can't be true. The reason for this behavior is because by you telling him that he's wrong, he knows that he is saying something that you believe to be intellectually incorrect and that he is being stupid and every shithead is a great fool and so they have egos the size of all outdoors and so they don't like to have their intellects not perform right for them and they don't like you to know when it hasn't and they don't like you knowing that they learned something from you and they don't like themselves knowing that they have. He doesn't like that you were being smarter than him. He doesn't want you to think that you are his intellectual superior. He wants you to deem him your intellectual superior. He doesn't want you to deem him a fool. He has _control issues_ and so minds so much you being the one in control. Also, shitheads are all a bunch of meanies, every last one of them, so they blame you for defending yourself with the truth and for daring to question their intellects. They believe themselves to be sacred cows.

 

One other thing that I've noticed about lots of stupid people is that when they are telling someone something that they know is untrue, it can be obvious from the way their voice sounds and from their expressions and from their words that they don't really think what they are claiming. A lot of the times, they are trying to trick themselves. I will come back to this paragraph to elaborate some time in the future.

 

Shitheads also think that they can trick you into thinking that you are feeling certain emotions that you don't presently feel and they think that they can trick you into thinking that you feel whatever emotion that they want you to feel due to whatever reason that they want you to think that you are feeling the emotion for. For example, if a shithead wants you to think that a lamp post has been making you horny for the last twenty seconds, he thinks that all he has to do is tell you that and with a one-word sentence. If a shithead tells you an unflattering lie about you to offend you, he thinks that he can make you think that you believe the lie and on top of that, he thinks that he can make you think that the lie has offended you. Thus he will think that there are two things going on inside your brain that aren't. The lie can be something that no one could have such a low IQ that they would believe.

 

From what I can tell, I think that people of the lowest intelligence who can read particular facial expressions, body languages and tones of voice, oftentimes don't and this is due to the fact that they don't have the powers of observation to notice what they would be able to read.

 

Not counting times when two shitheads had been arguing with one another, I know of no time that any shithead ever had the intellectually correct opinion when they'd argued to win an argument. This includes long drawn out arguments that they'd argued hard to win, or arguments that just lasted a brief moment where the shithead just said one thing to rebut something what they've been told. Nor do I know of a time that a shithead ever seemed to be aware that the person they were arguing with or any spectators knew that they just wanted to win the argument for the sake of winning it and so they would say anything to win the argument.

 

One reason why shitheads think that people don't think the tiniest bit broadmindedly is because shitheads don't.

 

I mentioned above that if you prove to a shithead that his intellect had failed him that he will try to prove to himself that that was nothing more than a fluke. He will also do this if you tell him all at once about a bunch of ways that his intellect had failed him. This is because he thinks it's possible that he can have his intellect fail him over and over again as a fluke.

 

In the past, I have told shitheads both in letters and verbally all in one sitting about lots of times that they acted like great fools and made stupid assumptions and failed to realize things that go without saying to everyone else and the shitheads actually tried to make themselves think that each and every way that I had told them about how their intellect had kept on failing them so badly was just a fluke.

 

One way they went about it was by telling themselves that they are of such a superior intellect that they have the ingenuity to make up feasible sounding lies to shoot down what I'd told them, and that by doing this, as an extra bonus, they will be duping me into thinking that the reason why I thought their intellects failed them is because I am the one who's not as smart as I thought I was.

 

Another way they went about it was by comforting themselves in the knowledge that they have such high IQs that they can come up with feasible sounding things to lecture, chastise and undermine me for so that they can prove to themselves that they are the fount of all wisdom and that it's me who's the dummy and who's in need of learning.

 

Plus, the shitheads knew that I knew many more ways that their intellects had failed them that I didn't tell them about and yet they thought that they could magically make all of the things that I knew that meant their intellects had failed them become flukes by outsmarting me in the above ways. But, usually a shithead won't allow you to tell him about too many times that his intellect has failed him. If you are on the phone, he will end the phone conversation. Before doing so, he will repeatedly interrupt you when you're talking.

 

The stupid can very often interpret each other's stupid behavior. It just may be that they usually always can.

 

Sometimes when a shithead is arguing with someone and gets told something that he either knows is true or that he suspects is true, he might not decide to rebut it in order to try winning the argument and to regain control. However, if this is the case, then for the purpose of trying to win the argument and to not feel at as much of a loss of control, he will ignore what he was just told in silence. Usually, the shithead will have to be arguing with the person for a few minutes before he will decide against not rebutting what the person says. In other words, in arguments, a shithead most of the time, right off the bat rebuts the first bunch of things people tell him. To state the obvious, this is because the shithead is in a big rush to prove that he's the smarter one and to control-freak the situation and he considers the argument to be "an intellectual showdown." Hence, he will sometimes remain silent after he's been losing the argument badly for a little while.

 

One of the many reasons why after dumbshits get taught by you that a bad misassumption that the dumbshits have made about you is false (like how your intellect didn't measure up in a monumental way, and about you being a no-goodnik, an ego-tripper, a weirdo, a wackjob, gay, a wuss, a cripple to name a few), is because it's the dumbshit's personal opinion that these major assumptions of his are way way way too trivial and tiny to merit remembering.

 

Also, if a dumbshit tells you a major assumption about you that's bad, and if you therefore teach him that it's wrong or at the least if you teach him that it could very well be wrong and if he is seeing that he cannot get you to conclude that this bad misassumption about you is even a drop true no matter how hard he tries, very shortly afterwards, he will forget that you had ever thought otherwise. This is because it's his personal opinion that him finding out from you that his intellect failed him in such a major way by making a major misassumption that's stupid with stupid logic behind it is too trivial to merit remembering and it's his personal opinion that the really bad misassumptions are too trivial to remember had turned out to be wrong and it's his personal opinion that it's trivial and not major that you can't be made to think that his bad misassumptions about you are true even though he argued with you about them a bunch of times for a half-hour each time and even though in arguing with him you had repeatedly proved to him that he was wrong by you bombarding him with facts that a two-year-old in diapers would know can't be denied and so you have all these good reasons to know that his assumption about you is wrong and that he now does too, he will not have the wisdom to know that since you have countless good reasons to know that his assumption about you is wrong and that since it is wrong, that this is something important enough to remember and so he won't remember and he thinks that him fucking with you by telling you the bad misassumption in order to give you grief is trivial behavior of his and so he will forget all about it.

 

A shithead theorizes that if he's not as skilled at lying as he's hoping that he might be, and so he's about to fail at getting you to believe with a one hundred percent certainty a lie that he's about one second to a few seconds away from telling you, he's still thinking that he is such a most exceptionally skilled liar that he might get you to suspect that his lie is true. Thus, he will decide upon using an authoritative tone and facial expression to tell you the lie because he reasons that if you're such a fool that there's a possibility that you can be made to suspect that he might be telling you the truth, then him using an authoritative tone and facial expression when he's lying to you will increase your estimation of how likely his lie is true. He also reasons that if he doesn't sound authoritative and look like he's saying something that means that no truer words have ever been spoken before, then you might not think the lie is true, so him using an authoritative tone and facial expression will get you to open your mind to the lie and then from there conclude that there is a good chance that the lie is true. A shithead doesn't think that it's imperative that he look and sound so authoritative and convinced. He just thinks that it may lend support to the lie.

 

For example, a shithead might sometimes think that it's a coin toss that you will believe him if he has a blank expression and speaks to you in a monotone voice or with a non-descript expression and a non-descript voice when he's lying to you, BUT if he makes his voice sound authoritative and if he makes his face look authoritative when he's lying to you, then you're going to maybe be thinking that the odds that his lie is true are maybe two out of three.

 

There are other tones that shitheads use to try to get people to believe their lies.

 

For example, I once tried to tell a shithead uncle of mine about my correct interpretation of something in a store that I bore witness to with my own two eyes that was taking place less than three feet in front of me, so he interrupted me when I was talking to tell me that I was wrong and a detailed assumption about what really happened and why I thought it happened. Then, each of the four more times that I tried to finish telling him what it really was that I had seen, he interrupted me to tell me a guess he was taking about why I saw it and he knew that his guess wasn't likely to be true and so it was more of a lie than a guess, but he tried to have me believe that there was no way at all that the lie/guess could not be true.

 

When he was done interrupting me the first time to contradict me, I tried to tell him four more times what I had seen and then he interrupted me each of those four times to tell me a guess/lie about the reason why I saw it. The second, third and fourth time that the old fool interrupted me to tell me the guess/lie, the huge shithead was speaking in a voice that meant that he was frantic, crazed, desperate, totally authoritative, angry and defensive while speaking really really really fast because he was in such a rush to win the argument and prove to both himself and me that he is as smart as he would prefer to be and that he is my intellectual superior by long long long long long shot and to take back control.

 

I didn't want to be interrupted again, so I gave up trying to tell him why it was that I had seen what I had seen. Instead, I told him that his lie/guess was wrong. He responded by telling me something that no one who isn't way way way way below average in intelligence would ever think they could get anyone to believe. When he did, he used an authoritative tone thinking that it very well may be that if he doesn't use that authoritative tone, well then I might not believe him.

 

Then, I started all over again to try to tell him about why it was that I saw what I saw, but he interrupted me to repeat my words in a sarcastic, patronizing, angry voice and he was making his voice sound like his intelligence was insulted even though his intelligence was NOT insulted. If this wasn't over the phone, if we were speaking face to face, the then septuagenarian with the people smarts of a small child would have made an expression on his face to match his voice, thinking that me seeing his expression might just be a little extra something that will result in me believing him. He also hoped that at the very very very very very very very very very least that him doing the voice would change it so that I would be at a loss as to whether or not I should think his guess/lie is the truth. In other words, this freak of nature who was well into his seventies but who was mentally a child in the single digits due to his inability to pick up wisdom like a human being, actually thought that I might therefore not know what to believe all due to what tone(s) he puts on. In other words, he thought that simply by the way he makes his voice sound, that I might not know whether or not what I was saying was right or whether or not what he was saying was right. Like I might think it's a coin toss.

 

Then, he told me his lie/guess again, but this time in a voice that was disgusted, hostile, angry and as authoritative as can be, thinking that I'm going to think that I won't know that he was acting and that I was going to think that he was right to feel the way he was pretending because I have a low IQ and so I was being stupid and that he is a smarty and way smarter than me and so he can deduce in literally one second what really happened and why it happened.

 

Say for the sake of argument that I am wrong for thinking that I know why it was that I saw what I saw. Then there could have been countless other reasons why I saw what I saw. This is a glaring example of how a typical shithead thinks that he can get you to think that there's only one explanation about why something happened when there can be countless explanations about why something happened.

 

It was on six different occasions that I saw what I saw in the store. Out of the six times that I saw what I saw, there were five different reasons why.

 

So then I told him about the sixth time that I saw it and I proved to him that I was right and that his assumption might be wrong and that his guess/lie definitely was wrong

 

So then he made up a lie about how the reason why I saw what I saw might have had something to do with someone thinking that I'm a weirdo. When he told me this he spoke to me in a voice that meant that he was lashing out at me. To state the obvious and at the risk of sounding redundant, this is because--as much as tomatoes hate rain--the less intelligent hate finding out that they've over-appraised their intellects.

 

That was also an example of how it's a behaviorism of having an intellect that is tremendously inferior to most people's intellects to like to insult people they are arguing with to make them mad, upset, offended etc.

 

He was one of the biggest schmucks I've ever known and a former friend of mine was one of the biggest schmucks I've ever known and possibly the biggest one I have ever known and I have been made privy to about a hundred low-IQ assumptions of my uncle's and I have been made privy to probably about a thousand low-IQ assumptions of my former friend or maybe even double that and I know of not even one assumption between these two that was ever true. What this means is that those inflicted with the worst intellects of them all are basically never right. Since there are millions of people with intellects like these two, what this means is that there are millions of shitheads out there who go assuming like they don't get any oxygen to breathe unless they can come up with something to have as a misassumption, but they only get to take a few breaths of oxygen whenever they do and that they have to somehow manage to come up with something else to assume that's as wrong as can be if they want to take a few more breaths of oxygen, that a shithead who will live a full human lifespan will make millions of dead-wrong assumptions that no one who isn't a shithead would assume.

 

I know of examples of different shitheads thinking that the parents of legal adults who are youths are not only still authority figures to the adult youths, but just as much of an authority figure to them as when they were only but two years old. I also know of cases of shitheads thinking that people in their late teens into their twenties, due to their youth are as wet behind the ears as young children no older than about eight tops, but usually younger than eight. I also know of cases of shitheads thinking that if someone is youth that this means that their maturity level is that of a youth years and years their junior. On top of that, I know of two different shitheads who weren't authority figures to these particular young adults by any stretch of the imagination, yet one of those shitheads thought that he was a parental authority figures to me when I was nineteen and so was my father and Captain Crunch thought that he was a parental authority figure to Princess Leia's sister because she was nineteen and so was her mother.

 

Shitheads even think that adult youths who have been adults for at least a half of a decade are as immature as youths who are young children. I know of different examples from different shitheads of this. This is all because shitheads have problems with shades of gray. Also, stupid people think that all adults are as wet behind the ears as day-old infants up to eight year olds who are below average in intelligence, so of course they will also underestimate people who actually are youths.

 

One reason why it's hard arguing with shitheads is because all of them--every last one of them--have drastically over-inflated appraisals of their own personal intelligence and have abnormally low opinions of everyone else's intelligence.

 

Stupid people think that they just have to spend about seven to nineteen seconds to tell you something that will instantly make you hate things that you love and love things that you hate.

 

Over the years, on paper, I've frequently made lists of all of the adults I've ever met who had way way way worse than average intelligence (counting one I only used to talk to over the phone) in order to count how many adult shitheads that I have met. Sometimes I counted a little over twenty shitheads. I need to stop throwing my lists out and losing them because sometimes I forget some of them and so what this likely means is that it could be that I've counted about twenty-five of these fuckers that I've met. (But when I first started counting I had left some of the ones out whom I had only known fleetingly from my distant past due to me forgetting they existed.) Out of these twentysomething, a fair share were Puerto Ricans and half-breed Puerto Ricans. The list did not include people I've pegged as stupid that I did not know personally. It also did not include stupid people whose intellects were so horrible that they were mildly retarded or a little smarter than mildly retarded. Also, I had twice made a list of those I suspected were stupid. There was a Rican on that list and a halfbreed Rican. I've heard lots of people since I was a child tell me about incidents that they've had with Puerto Ricans due to these Puerto Ricans having low IQs (and bad morals).

 

 

The monumentally stupid don't always like to give other people credit for things. Sometimes it's because they feel that the person is competition to them, sometimes it's out of jealousy and sometimes it's because since all stupid people are buffoons, some stupid people like for people to not be in as good a way as they are because some stupid people only like it to be so they are not in a bad way about anything and because stupid people like to get mean and so they might want to try tricking someone into thinking that they're not smart enough to have learned something or that they're not physically capable of being able to do somethings. Sometimes unbelievably stupid people don't like it that someone else has learned something that the shitheads haven't learned and so the buffoons don't want to acknowledge to themselves, to that person and to others that the person is right for thinking that they know something. A shithead sometimes doesn't even like it that someone else has learned something that doesn't by any stretch mean that the shithead's IQ would be even one fraction less of an IQ point for not having learned--due to there not having ever been any reason for the shithead to have ever found out about it. This is because they want to be super-intelligent, but since they aren't super-intelligent, they don't always have a general idea what they don't need to feel insecure for not knowing.

 

E.g., if you are to show a shithead how to bunt a baseball and the shithead has never played baseball and has never watched a baseball game and so he would have no reason to have ever learned how to bunt a baseball, he nonetheless might still feel stupid for not knowing how to bunt a baseball. Thus he might try to get you to think that he is an expert at bunting a baseball and he'll show you how it's supposedly done right. If he remembers how he saw someone bunt in a movie, so he actually does know how to bunt and he shows you how he saw the person bunt in the movie in order to make the case that you're doing it wrong and that your way won't ever work even once and it never has in the past and so you then tell him that his way of bunting is just one way there is to bunt and that there are a lot of other ways too, he will again try to get you to think that his way is the only way that can ever work.

 

And sometimes stupid people don't like to give credit to others for having accomplished something.

 

Since Captain Crunch wasn't more than a few drops intellectually minded and only on rare occasions and since he almost never needed to partake in anything educational and since he would not bother to remember anything he found out about that was academic and since he could not care less about anything academic or find anything academic interesting or deem it significant, what this has to mean is that it is a major major behavior pattern of being a dummy to be this way. They're all alike, so if one is a certain way due to his or her stupidity, then it's a behavior pattern for others to be that way. But I have learned that a few of the stupidest people I've met are intellectually minded and pursue intellectual activities. A dead uncle of mine was dumber than a bag of hammers and he was the most intellectually minded individual I have ever known and so much so that he dedicated his life to scholastic things and I won't ever in the future no matter how long I live come to know anyone else who is as equally intellectually minded as he was. But he and Captain Crunch are the only two dummies I knew well and over a long period of time, so I don't have much to go on here. Captain Crunch had a tranny boyfriend and Captain Crunch lied to people by telling people that this thing was from Brazil when it was from Mexico. Since Captain Crunch was a full-fledged adult in his thirties by the time he got involved with this freakazoid, what this has to mean is that Captain Crunch--like every adult--had heard many times over that they speak Portuguese in Brazil, but that he did not in the tiniest way find this interesting or significant, so he plumb forgot each and every time. Thus this ignoramus didn't know that if the shemale starts speaking Spanish in the presence of people who get told the lie that he's from Brazil or if Captain Crunch ever tells people that the dude speaks Spanish and if Captain Crunch also tells those people that the dude is from Brazil, this will possibly tip them off to the fact that the guy ain't from Brazil. Plus a Brazilian accent must be a Portuguese accent and not a Spanish accent and some people might be able to tell the difference. Plus, some people might know what a Brazilian accent sounds like. I had a Brazilian girlfriend and on the TV show Sex and the City, I heard a woman speaking with the same accent as my former Brazilian girlfriend and I instantly recognized it even though I hadn't heard it in many years.

 

Plus Captain Crunch repeatedly forgetting that they speak Portuguese in Brazil might have also had something to do with his memory being the worst there is.

 

Sometimes when you're arguing with a shithead, if he is smart enough to be taught what you're telling him, he will not even know that he is smart enough to be taught it and he won't be taught the thing that he is smart enough to be taught. This is because by reflex, he will instantly rebut what you're telling him without giving even a millisecond of thought to what you're telling him. If someone who isn't a shithead is to instantly rebut something that they are told without spending a millisecond analyzing what they've just been told due to him not wanting to hear it, he will have the self-awareness to know that he just got taught something and that he's trying to delude himself that it's not true and that he's trying to will it away. He might even succeed at deluding himself that it's not true, but (most of the time) he'll be somewhat aware that he's not being truthful to himself. A while later, he might even remember having deluded himself. I mentioned above once, twice or thrice that shitheads don't know when they are deluding themselves about things due to the shitheads not having the self-awareness that the rest of us have.

 

Shitheads are always concluding that people are making mistakes when they aren't.

 

Since everyone cares about themselves very dearly, shitheads like everyone else care about themselves very dearly. On that account, each and every shithead believes that their life is the most important life in the history of life on earth. So what this means is that if a shithead doesn't care a thing about you, he will think that he can do anything he wants to you--with his logic being that because he cares about himself so much and because he doesn't care at all about you, then unlike his life, your life is not a drop important. He believes this to be true so wholeheartedly that it doesn't occur to him that you and anybody else in the world might disagree. This is because it's impossible to be a shithead without being narrow of mind. (Of course it goes without saying that there are shitheads out there somewhere who must think that their lives aren't as important as the lives of their loved ones. That would be their children, their significant others and less frequently their parents.)

 

I've never met a shithead who wasn't a sickie and because shitheads are sickies, they often think and behave even stupider than they would if they weren't sickies. To state the obvious, their assumptions are extra extra stupid. Because shitheads are sickies, shitheads make more assumptions than they would if they weren't sickies. Because shitheads are sickies, the sick assumptions they assume become even extra extra impossible for the shitheads to learn are untrue. Shitheads are all sickies, so sometimes that makes it so they are less able to see that they have done people wrong. Since they're sickies, they're also less able to care that they've done people wrong, and shitheads won't spend any time giving any thought to something that they don't care about. They are sickies and thus this increases the size of their egos and so they don't want to accept that they were stupid for assuming something stupid and so they refuse to acknowledge that the assumption isn't correct. If they make an assumption due to them being sickies and not merely only shitheads, the assumption can be exacerbated by their moronic intellects. If they make an assumption because they are stupid, the assumption can be extra severe by them being sick in the head.

 

For example since stupid people assume everyone is exactly like them, it stands to reason that because Captain Crunch is a scoundrel that he assumes that everyone else is and plus it's a thought-pattern of being a shithead to assume that people are amoral.

 

Thus, once Captain Crunch's father was minutes away from buying Captain Crunch an SUV at a car dealership. But, due to Captain Crunch reading that the car was assembled on April 1, Captain Crunch decided against getting the car--explaining to his father that mechanics deliberately sabotage cars that were assembled on April Fool's day to make the cars not work. Captain Crunch walked away. If I am remembering right, this was probably on the lot and not in an office. As Captain Crunch was walking away, his father yelled at him, "You're a sick boy! You're a sick boy! You're a sick boy! You're a sick boy! You're a sick boy!" But this could very well be an assumption that he made purely due to his unusually inferior intellect and that it doesn't have jack to do with the fact that he is sick. As a side note, this also has to do with the countless ways that a shithead always manages to find ways of assuming something bad about other people and jobs. This is also a glaring example of an assumption that a shithead has made that even though there are seven billion other people on the planet, that none of these people would also make.

 

For no apparent reason, stupid people like to show people that they're getting mean by antagonizing them to give them grief. And stupid people like to also give people grief by telling them bad things that have to do with them, but not so the people know that they're being antagonized, but so that the people feel bad about themselves, get offended, angry etc. The bad things can be the truth and they can be boldfaced lies and guesses that shithead doesn't know whether they're true or not.

 

And stupid people like to give people grief in other miscellaneous ways. For example, I once had a job in a restaurant and there was a cook there who was a confirmed "dummy" and he kept shutting off the air-conditioner immediately after each and every time that I turned it on in order to make me have to keep walking back to the room where the switch to the air-conditioner is and to make me mad and possibly to make me mad at him, to frustrate me etc.

 

Not counting stupid people in the course of playing the bigshot and power-tripping, I have noticed that about a handful of stupid people had liked to mess with people in the above ways to give them grief. Therefore I racked my brain to try to remember whether or not I could come up with some adult who isn't stupid but did these things too, and I could not think of anyone. I think that if you're born stupid that you're going to turn out to be less moral than most. I think that people should start discriminating against the stupid instead of discriminating against people for what race and religion they are.

 

Another way that stupid people think that everyone in the world is exactly like them is that stupid people think that everyone does things that the stupid people do. For example, Deep Throat once complained to me that Captain Crunch is always accusing him of trying to swindle him and then because part of Captain Crunch's income comes from thievery and tricking people out of their money, Deep Throat declared that Captain Crunch must be up to a lot of really hokey shit and this is why he thinks that Deep Throat is trying to swindle him all of the time. I know of lots of examples of Captain Crunch thinking that people are thieves and swindlers and being amoral in other miscellaneous ways that he is amoral (like he thinks that because he cannot do a favor for someone unless something is in it for him, that no one else does either). A lot of examples are of people using normal honest jobs as a vehicle to steal and cheat people. A particular dentist and a particular cab driver, for example. One reason Captain Crunch insisted that this the cab driver used his job to steal from people and to cheat people when Captain Crunch never set eyes on the man is because Captain Crunch was a cab driver at the time and so he used to use his cab driver's job to steal from people and to cheat people.

 

I think I just vaguely remember mentioning the following, so I will now in case I didn't. Shitheads can't stand it when they know that you taught them something that they didn't know and that you know that they taught them something that they didn't know. They want to think that they are too smart to learn something from you and they mind so much that you know that you taught them something new and so they will try to delude you and usually also themselves into thinking that what you told them is dead wrong and very stupid. Shitheads do not honor and respect facts.

 

There are two other things that I've noticed that a handful of shitheads did in arguments that I've gotten into with them. (1) Upon me telling them things that they knew for certain were true, they made believe that they had some doubt about whether or not those things were true. (2) Upon me telling them a fact that they didn't want to be true, but they had the brains to know is more than likely true, they wouldn't spend even a fraction of a second trying to figure out whether or not it was true. What they did instead was make up something to tell me about how they weren't entirely convinced. Sometimes it was by making up something to tell me about what the truth might or might not be. This was only done by shitheads who had the ounce of brains to know that they couldn't dupe me into thinking that there was no way that I was wrong and sometimes it was because they had the ounce of brains to know that I would know that if they made believe that there's no way at all that I could be right, that I would think that they were being stupid. To state the obvious, in every example, they would have preferred that I had told them something that was blatantly wrong and stupid so that they could tell me so.

 

Since stupid people mind so much losing arguments, if they lose an argument, they often try to get back at the people they lost arguments to. Sometimes right away and sometimes afterwards.

 

One of the reasons that stupid people are bad people is because they are immature and so they like to say things to upset people and they like to do things to sabotage people. Children are nasty and stupid adults being nasty is the same thing. Plus, stupid people are nasty in the very same exact ways that children are.

 

One of the reasons why shitheads when they're arguing will state untrue notions that will always cause the people they're arguing with to remember past examples that refute what these shitheads are claiming is because unlike people who are slightly below average in intelligence on up, shitheads don't always recall past examples of things that will disprove things that they believe to be true which means that they are as wet behind the ears as very young children.

 

For example, when Captain Crunch was a 36-year-old adult, he got into an argument with Princess Leia for him telling her that no women will go out with bald men. One of the many reasons it's his opinion that none of the billion or so bald men in the whole entire world can get a date or get laid except for with hookers or unless they are rich and famous is because it did not occur to him to try to remember any bald men who had girlfriends, wives, who've gone on dates, who've had one night stands, two night stands, quickies and sex partners. Men who are bald don't look as good as they would if they still had all their hair, so this shithead thinks that they must look like crap since everything is either black or white. Captain Crunch is very very very bald, and Princess Leia was his girlfriend and former fiancee and he knew of lots of women who wanted to get with him. Maybe this is a case of stupid people thinking that they're the exception to the rule? Suppose just to suppose that he had thought that most females won't go out with a man if he is bald but that there are some who will. This would be a gray assumption, and shitheads hardly have gray assumptions. They have black-and-white assumptions, so he thought that no bald man can get a date or get laid for free. But say just for academic purposes that he thinks that a rather smallish percent of females will get romantically involved with a bald guy, since he is narrow-minded and thinks in black-and-white, he would have still phrased his sentences in ways to assert that no female will.

 

 Stupid people think that adults place all this importance on looks and that besides money, looks is the only thing that they care about when it comes to people they get involved with romantically or go on dates with, so no bald man has a social life.

 

Also, specific accounts of bald men who've had social lives didn't automatically pop into his head without him having to go searching his memory like it might for people who aren't shitheads. In other words, tell people who are only slightly below average in intelligence up to the smartest people in the world and some of them will automatically recall bald men who have girlfriends, wives, who go on dates, have steady sex partners, have one night stands and two night stands, who fool around with members of the opposite sex.

 

What it's like getting into an argument with a shithead due to the shithead telling you an assumption is telling him why the assumption is wrong and then him having an assumption about why what you've just told him is wrong and him telling you that assumption and then you telling him why that assumption is wrong and then him finding something in that to assume and him telling it to you and so on and so on. A lot of times when you tell him why an assumption is wrong, this is going to cause him to make two, three or four new assumptions all at once that he will tell you. I had an uncle whom I caused to assume four things in one shot due to an argument that we got into due to him telling me an assumption that he made about me that I had proved to him was wrong. The reason why even though I had proved to him that he was wrong, that he couldn't stop assuming is because that's what they do.

 

Stupid people think that other people are inanimate objects who were put on earth strictly so that years and years later, when they come in contact with the stupid people, the stupid people can use them as a tool to fulfill their needs. Also, they are put on earth not just for the stupid people to use as tool to fulfill their needs, but they have to act in certain ways and live their lives in certain ways so that the stupid people can objectify them and if they don't, then they are doing wrong by the stupid people. I've never known anyone who wasn't way way below average in intelligence who objectified someone.

 

One of the reasons why when a shithead is arguing with people or if a shithead wants to get mean for some stupid reason that the shithead will make up some lie to tell those people about how they haven't learned something which means that they are as wet behind the ears as a newborn infant up to an eight-year-old who has a low IQ, but usually up to a six-year-old and very rarely a child as old as eight and that when it is a child as old as eight it's usually one whose intellect is tremendously inferior to mostly everyone else's, is because even though the shithead knows that the people learned what she is telling them, she thinks that they don't know countless other things that make them equally as wet behind the ears and more wet behind the ears.

 

Once in either 2000 or in 1999, I went into an internet message board that Captain Crunch used to frequently post in and I read a bunch of posts he posted that were fraught with spelling errors that anyone who isn't a shithead would be able to tell were not spelled correctly. Most of the time when I spell a word incorrectly, I still by looking at it can tell that it's spelled incorrectly. For example, if my memory serves, Captain Crunch spelled the word Mormon as "mormin" and with no capital M. This must mean that stupid people don't learn how to spell as well as the next guy does. When they see words in print, they don't remember approximately how they are spelled. There was also a shithead in a message board that I used to post in who was repeatedly misspelling words in his posts.

 

People whose intellects that are so way way worse than what is typical also for really stupid reasons think bad things about people that have to do with them and jobs and them and money due to the people saying something or doing something that jobs and money don't have anything to do with what they've said or done. Also shitheads think things about people just because the shitheads know what kind of jobs people have or because the shitheads know something about their financial situation.

 

In searching my memory so many times, I haven't been able to come up with even one lone assumption that anyone made that would mean that they are way way way below average in intelligence that would be a flattering assumption about someone else, but I can remember assumptions that a shithead made that no one who isn't a shithead would ever assume that are neither good nor bad. They were neutral. I.e., I had an uncle with a low IQ who used to repeatedly act on how he assumed that anyone who was in his presence and anyone whom he was speaking to over the telephone was just as interested in his son as he was and various ways that everyone in the world had personality traits and priorities that he did that weren't bad.

 

Not only can shitheads not be disabused of assumptions of theirs that are so stupid that their assumptions have to mean that they are way below average in intelligence and not only can't shitheads who aren't able to be taught that anyone can interpret their behavior when not knowing that it can be or at the least not suspecting that it can be would have to mean that the shitheads are way below average in intelligence, if someone is not stupid, but they have made an unbelievably stupid assumption or that they've believed something that they've heard or read that is unbelievably stupid, they probably cannot learn that it is not true. For example, my cousin who is not stupid, in late 1999 kept telling me that on New Year's Day for Y2K that all computers are going to go haywire and that the world is going to be in turmoil. If I remember right, she told me that people programmed computers to do this to sabotage the world. I don't know whether everyone who thinks that the world is only 6,000 years old is stupid, but when they find out that tests have been done on rocks that have determined that rocks are millions or billions of years old, they don't conclude that the world can't be only 6,000 years old.

 

Then, soon after January 1, 2000, due to absolutely not one tiny miniscule thing having happened, I had thought to myself, "Boy don't you feel stupid now," and then she explained to me that bad things did happen but that the general public doesn't know about them.

 

I'm not sure whether I mentioned this, but in arguments when a shithead is trying to get you to think that you are wrong about something that no one can be so stupid that they could ever be made to think that they are wrong for knowing is true and the shithead is so wet behind the ears that he doesn't know this, but he is at least smart enough to know that it isn't likely that he can get you to think you are wrong--even if he thinks that the odds of him getting you to think that you are wrong are basically nil, he will try to anyway because he thinks that he's gotta try since he would give his first born to make you and he think that you're the less intelligent one and that he's demonstrating his genius and to regain control of the situation and to get a win and to prevent you from getting a win and knowing that you got the win.

 

If someone who isn't stupid minds terribly finding out some piece of bad news, they sometimes can delude themselves that it's not true and to the point where they will soon after forget about it forever. But the difference between them and shitheads is that when they find out a second time that the bad news is something that exists, they usually remember that they'd learned it in the past.

 

I can't remember if I mentioned this already. I probably did. One way that you will learn that a shithead is a shithead if they are either a perfect stranger, a virtual stranger or someone whom you know a little bit better than just a virtual stranger, is that they will (a) display that they have a big ego due to them being a buffoon, due to them being a shithead and (b) not have the people smarts to know that you will be able to read them so very easily. I know tons of  examples of this with tons of shitheads. For example, once I was talking to a shithead over the phone whom I already knew was a shithead and an even bigger shithead than Captain Crunch if you can believe it. He was a teenager, so I told him that his voice got deeper. He replied. "I got older. Been balling girls."

 

Stupid people also make black-and-white statements and sweeping statements to sum things up about other people when they know that the things that they're summing up aren't as severe as the things that the shitheads are claiming. This is because they are very very very very very comfortable thinking very very very very very very dichotomously. All the examples that I know of this would mean that the other people would be inadequate and pathetic if what the shitheads said had been true. And they'll delude themselves that things are as extreme as can be since they are used to thinking in black and white. If the shithead is making a black-and-white statement about himself, then in that case, it's something wonderful.

 

Stupid people all mind losing way more than most people do and this is one of umpteen different reasons that stupid people won't stop arguing and concede that they lost a particular argument.

 

One universal thing that male heterosexual shitheads repeatedly do, especially young ones, is that they are always trying to impress others with how females are so extremely attracted to them and with how many females they get and with how pretty and hot the females are. They can sometimes be telling the truth and sometimes they lie. The first two examples of this that come to mind, were from two shitheads and both were ugly and one was 5'4, but 5'7 if you're asking him and if you had accessed his former My Space page.

 

Because stupid people are concrete, it goes without saying that they don't know when someone is asking a rhetorical question. I know of not one example of this to back this up though.

 

Yet one other reason a person of low IQ will not admit to you or to himself when you have presented him with a bunch of detailed examples why any one of his retarded assumptions is wrong is because he has no respect for the logical reasoning behind it.

 

I don't think that I already mentioned above that stupid people often mind when you know something good about yourself and when you suspect that there might be something about yourself that's good.

 

I don't know whether or not if I search my memory that I would be able to recall any example of some shithead tremendously overestimating anyone's intellect and to the point where people would have IQs that are way higher than anyone has ever had. However, I would venture to guess that once in a blue blue blue blue moon that shitheads do. If I am right, the reason why they do is because they don't know people.

 

I mentioned above that the stupid deem major things trivial and so they don't remember major things due to them not having the logic to know the major things are major. However, in further analyzing this fact, I have realized that they must sometimes upon having the ounce of brains to know that some things are major, still nonetheless think that the major things aren't anything that necessitates remembering.

 

Since all shitheads think that everyone in the world is exactly like them, this means that they always manage to find ways of assuming they are seeing examples of how everyone in the world is exactly like them.

 

I once asked Princess Leia if when she first knew Captain Crunch whether she had always known that the assumptions that he told her about people were stupid and wrong. She responded by telling me "no" because she was only seventeen years old and was "wet behind the ears." Since Princess Leia is way above average in intelligence, what this means is that it is possible for someone who is a youth whose intellect is up to snuff to be made to think things that if the youth was to be the one to assume them would mean that s/he has an intellect that is tremendously inferior to most people's intellects.

 

If a shithead really wants you to do something, he'll delude himself that there is a fair enough chance that you will. He will delude himself that you will do this all on your own or as a direct result of him spending like five to seven seconds telling you that you should. But he will almost always never have the wisdom of knowing that the odds of you blindly obeying him are zero.

 

When a simpleton is arguing with someone for the sake of arguing and the person tells the simpleton why something is true, the simpleton will tell the person why it's supposedly wrong whilst making out like the person just told them something that's unbelievably stupid which therefore makes them a fool and/or wet behind the ears/and or retarded. The simpleton doesn't ever make believe the person is just being a little bit stupid.

 

Stupid people hate to admit to you and to themselves that they don't know something.

 

One of the reasons that simpletons think that people are as wet behind the ears as newborns to two-year-olds is because simpletons are narrow-minded. For example, when I was twenty-seven, an uncle of mine whose intellect was inferior to mostly everyone's once over the telephone spent a half an hour explaining to by step-by-step how to do basic exercises like sit-ups, jumping jacks, pushups etc. whilst speaking in a voice that meant that he was telling something informative and that I didn't know a thing about what he was talking about and that it all was brand-new to me. He thought that I was on tenterhooks the whole half an hour.

 

 had nothing to do with the fact that he assumed that I have a real low IQ.

 

 

 

Tests have shown that your average democrat has a better intellect than your average republican.

 

Every shithead who has ever lived has genuinely deemed himself super intelligent, but sometimes for brief moments they do suspect that they might not be.

 

Every shithead I've ever known well was a narcissist and for some of the ones I just barely knew I was able to tell that they were narcissists and I am guessing that all of the ones that I barely knew were but that I was not around them enough to be able to deduce that they were. Also, ones I've heard about and saw on TV and heard on the radio were too.

 

Shitheads also don't learn from other people's mistakes. This includes mistakes of other people which they have thousands of past examples to go by.

 

Shitheads make up lies about people that have to do with the things that genuinely cause shitheads to think things about people that the shitheads believe with a one hundred percent certainty and that cause all shitheads' brains to malfunction in countless miscellaneous ways. For example, if a shithead ever in the past has made up a lie about how some thirty-five-year-old man had gotten spooked by a four-year-old in a Mickey Mouse costume on Halloween and this is because he is gay and so he has the mind of a female and is afraid of mice, this would be a lie that has to do with other people being scaredy cats, something non-platonic about other people, that other people are stupid and how if someone belongs to a different group than the shithead that s/he is exactly like everyone else in the group and a gay man having the mind of a female would be an established stereotype and shitheads believe stereotypes apply to everyone.

 

Since the month that I was twenty-two and ten months old, I have been testing shitheads by presenting to them ways of verifying my suspicions that they have such horrific intellects that they think that people are so stupid that they would have the brains of animals that are less intelligent than dogs, that people have the undeveloped minds of newborn infants up to eight-year-olds who are less intelligent than average and that people have the minds of retards and never even one time did any shithead ever convey to me that I had underestimated his or her intellect.

 

The other day my wife asked me if I've ever noticed that people who have anger issues usually aren't very smart.

 

Another example of how stupid people think that people who aren't stupid think like them is Captain Crunch thinking that every adult who isn't stupid thinks that everyone in creation who has an unskilled low-paying job is stupid.

 

If a shithead is deluding himself that something that he would give his right arm for is really true or if he falsely thinks that something is true which he so desperately wants to be true and then you make him aware that the thing is untrue, he will conclude that it is your fault that it is untrue and he will lash out at you and try to get even with you.